Aggregate ranking of Spain´s universities in the Shanghai Ranking (ARWU): Effect on autonomous communities and campuses of international excellence

Authors

  • Domingo Docampo
  • Francisco Herrera
  • Teodoro Luque-Martí­nez
  • Daniel Torres-Salinas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.jul.16

Keywords:

University rankings, Shanghai Ranking, ARWU, International excellence campus, Scientific policy, Spain, Higher education, Bibliometrics indicators.

Abstract

The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) or Shanghai Ranking is a de facto standard to determine the position of universities worldwide. Improving ranking positions has become the goal of universities and governments. No wonder therefore that the aggregation of universities in Spain is nowadays suggested as a means to raise the international profile of our university system. In this context, the goal of this study was to test two potential groupings, universities belongingto the same Autonomous Community and campuses of international excellence (CEIs), to determine the ARWU placement that would result. To compute the ARWU indicators of these possible groupings, we used the methodology developed in Docampo (2012b). The results of our analysis clearly show the difficulty of improving ranking positions by calculating the sum of aggregated institutions. As a matter of fact, the only way to place a university cluster from Spain in the top 100 would be to treat all of the Catalan universities as a single institution. The next best ranking for Spain would be achieved by the Habitat 5U (universities of Comunidad Valenciana), BKC (Barcelona and Politècnica de Catalunya) and VLC/Campus (Valencia and Politécnica de Valencia), CEIs which would lie in the 150-200 range.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2012-07-26

How to Cite

Docampo, D., Herrera, F., Luque-Martí­nez, T., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Aggregate ranking of Spain´s universities in the Shanghai Ranking (ARWU): Effect on autonomous communities and campuses of international excellence. Profesional De La información, 21(4), 428–432. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.jul.16