Peer review: the attitudes and behaviours of Covid-19 pandemic-era early career researchers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.may.06Keywords:
Research, Scholarly communication, Scientific communication, Young researchers, ECRs, Early Career Researchers, Peer review, Reliability in peer review, Pandemics, Covid-19, Harbingers Project, Impacts, Consequences of the pandemic, interviews, Peer review trustworthiness, Surveys, Resilience, Differences between countries, China, France, Malaysia, Poland, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, USAAbstract
Explores science and social science early career researchers´ (ECRs) perceptions and experiences of peer review, seeking also to identify their views of any pandemic-associated changes that have taken place. Data are drawn from the Harbingers-2 project, which investigated the impact of the pandemic on scholarly communications. Peer review, one of the activities covered, is singled out as it proved to be the activity of greatest concern to ECRs. Findings are obtained from interviews, which covered around 167 ECRs from China, France, Malaysia, Poland, Russia, Spain, UK and US, supplemented by an international survey that took the data out to a bigger and wider audience for confirmation and generalisation. Results obtained are enhanced by comparisons with pre-pandemic evidence yielded by Harbingers-1, the forerunner of the present study, and anchored in an extensive review of the literature. Main findings are: 1) most ECRs were experienced in peer review, both as reviewers and authors, but few had formal training; 2) half the ECRs had a lot or some reservations as to whether peer review vouches for the trustworthiness of research; 3) inadequate reviewers and slow processes were the main peer review associated problems; 4) there was a strong feeling that some kind of compensation, whether monetary or reputational, could help in dealing with these problems; 5) the pandemic impacted most on the speed of processing, with the majority of ECRs saying it had slowed the process; 6) nearly everyone thought that any pandemic-induced impacts would be temporary.
Downloads
References
Allen, Kelly-Ann; Reardon, Jonathan; Lu, Yumin; Smith, David V.; Rainsford, Emily; Walsh, Lucas (2022). "Towards improving peer review: Crowd-sourced insights from Twitter". Journal of university teaching & learning practice, v. 19, n. 3. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol19/iss3/02
Anderson, Caleb; Nugent, Kenneth; Peterson, Christopher (2021). "Academic journal retractions and the COVID-19 pandemic". Journal of primary care & community health, v. 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501327211015592
Barroga, Edward (2020). "Innovative strategies for peer review". Journal of Korean medical science, v. 35, n. 20, e138. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e138
Bartneck, Christoph (2017). "Reviewers´ scores do not predict impact: Bibliometric analysis of the proceedings of the human-robot interaction conference". Scientometrics, n. 110, 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2176-y
Berkenkotter, Carol (1995). "The power and the perils of peer review". Rhetoric review, v. 13, n. 2, pp. 245-248. https://www.jstor.org/stable/465828
Blankstein, Melissa; Wolff"Eisenberg, Christine (2019). U.S. faculty survey 2018. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R. https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/SR-Report-US-Faculty-Survey-2018-04122019.pdf
Bonaccorsi, Andrea (2023). "Towards peer review as a group engagement". JLIS.it, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 46-59. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-511
Brainard, Jeffrey; You, Jia (2018). "What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing´s "˜death penalty´". Science. October 25. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty
Brezis, Elise S.; Birukou, Aliaksandr (2020). "Arbitrariness in the peer review process". Scientometrics, v. 123, n. 1, pp. 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03348-1
Burstein, David D. (2013). Fast future: How the millennial generation is shaping our world. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN: 978 0 807033227
Christian, Katherine; Johnstone, Carolyn; Larkins, Jo-ann; Wright, Wendy; Doran, Michael R. (2021). "Research culture: A survey of early-career researchers in Australia". ELife, n. 10, e60613. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60613
Christie, Alec P.; White, Thomas B.; Martin, Philip A.; Petrovan, Silviu O.; Bladon, Andrew J.; Bowkett, Andrew E.; Littlewood, Nick A.; Mupepele, Anne-Christine; Rocha, Ricardo; Sainsbury, Katherine A.; Smith, Rebecca K.; Taylor, Nigel G.; Sutherland, William J. (2021). "Reducing publication delay to improve the efficiency and impact of conservation science". PeerJ, n. 9, e12245. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12245
De-Araújo-Grisi, Gabriel; De-Deus-Barreto-Segundo, Joí£o; Freire, Camila-Verí´nica-Souza; Matias, Denise-Silva; Cruz, Mariana-Correia-Moreira; Laporte, Larrie-Rabelo; Medina-da-Silva, Daniel-Oliveira; Taniguchi, Thiago-Masashi; Requií£o, Letícia-Escorse; Goes, Bruno-Teixeira; Correia, Luis-Claudio-Lemos (2022). Evidence on the role of journal editors in the COVID19 infodemic - metascientific study analyzing COVID19 publication rates and patterns, medRxiv, 2022-01. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.23.22269716
Demarest, Bradford; Freeman, Guo; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2014). "The reviewer in the mirror: Examining gendered and ethnicized notions of reciprocity in peer review". Scientometrics, v. 101, pp. 717-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1354-z
Douglas, Hannah M.; Settles, Isis H.; Cech, Erin A.; Montgomery, Georgina M.; Nadolsky, Lexi R.; Hawkins, Arika K.; Ma, Guizhen; Davis, Tangier M.; Elliott, Kevin C.; Cheruvelil, Kendra-Spence (2022). "Disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 on marginalized and minoritized early-career academic scientists". PloS one, v. 17, n. 9, e0274278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274278
Duffy, Bobby; Shrimpton, Hannah; Clemence Michael (2017). Millennial myths and realities. London: Ipsos Mori. https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/millennial-myths-and-realities
Evason, Nina (2016). Malaysian culture: Core concepts. Cultural Atlas. https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/malaysian-culture/malaysian-culture-core-concepts
Eve, Martin-Paul; Neylon, Cameron; O´Donnell, Daniel-Paul; Moore, Samuel; Gadie, Robert; Odeniyi, Victoria; Parvin, Shahina (2021). Reading peer review: PLoS one and institutional change in academia. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108783521
Fanelli, Daniele; Glí¤nzel, Wolfgang (2013). Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS one, v. 8, n. 6, e66938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066938
FEPS (Foundation for European Progressive Studies); ThinkYoung, (2018). The millennial dialogue: Engaging and creating a better understanding of the priorities and values of millennials. https://www.millennialdialogue.com/#download
Flaherty, Colleen (2022). "The peer review crisis". Inside higher ed., June 13. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/06/13/peer-review-crisis-creates-problems-journals-and-scholars
Fraser, Nicholas; Brierley, Liam; Dey, Gautam; Polka, Jessica K.; Pálfy, Máté; Nanni, Federico; Coates, Jonathon-Alexis (2021). "The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape". PLoS biology, v. 19, n. 4, e3000959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959
García, José A.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, Rosa-María; Fernández-Valdivia, Joaquín (2022). "The cross-subsidy and buy-one-give-one models of compensated peer review: A comparative study for mission-driven journals". Journal of information science, Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221125321
Haffar, Samir; Bazerbachi, Fateh; Murad, M. Hassan (2019). "Peer review bias: A critical review". Mayo Clinic proceedings, v. 94, n. 4, pp. 670-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.004
Helliwell, Jack A.; Bolton, William S.; Burke, Joshua R.; Tiernan, Jim P.; Jayne, David G.; Chapman, Stephen J. (2020). "Global academic response to COVID-19: cross-sectional study". Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 4, pp. 385-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1317
Herman, Eti (2018). "Scholarly reputation". FEMS microbiology letters, v. 365, n. 18, fny200. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny200
Herman, Eti; Nicholas, David (2019). "Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: An activity-specific approach. Review article". El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 1, e280102. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.02
Herman, Eti; Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Abdullah, Abrizah; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Jamali, Hamid R.; Sims, David; Allard, Suzie; Tenopir, Carol; Xu, Jie; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Serbina, Galina; Parke-Cannon, Leah (2021). "The impact of the pandemic on early career researchers: what we already know from the internationally published literature". Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 2, e300208. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.08
Hesselmann, Felicitas; Graf, Verena; Schmidt, Marion; Reinhart, Martin (2017). "The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles". Current sociology, v. 65, n. 6, pp. 814-845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116663807
Homolak, Jan; Kodvanj, Ian; Virag, Davor (2020). "Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: A call for open science in the times of closed borders". Scientometrics, n. 124, pp. 2687-2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03587-2
Horbach, Serge P. J. M.; Halffman, Willem (2018). "The changing forms and expectations of peer review". Research integrity and peer review, v. 3, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5
Horbach, Serge P. J. M.; Halffman, Willem (2019). "The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications". Scientometrics, n. 118, pp. 339-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2969-2
Horbach, Serge P. J. M. (2020). "Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19". Quantitative science studies, v. 1, n. 3, pp. 1056-1067. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00076
Horbach, Serge P. J. M. (2021). "No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the COVID-19 pandemic". Research evaluation, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa037
Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Polezhaeva, Tatiana; Herman, Eti; Swigon, Marzena (2020). "Early career researchers and their authorship and peer review beliefs and practices: An international study". Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 2, pp. 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286
Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David; Sims, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Herman, Eti; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Åšwigon, Marzena; Abrizah, Abdullah; Xu, Jie; Tenopir, Carol; Allard, Susie (2023a). "The pandemic and changes in early career researchers´ career prospects, research and publishing practices". PLoS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281058
Jiang, Xiaoli; Borg, Erik; Borg, Michaela (2017). "Challenges and coping strategies for international publication: Perceptions of young scholars in China". Studies in higher education, v. 42, n. 3, pp. 428-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1049144
Johnson, Timothy P.; Feeney, Mary K.; Jung, Heyjie; Frandell, Ashlee; Caldarulo, Mattia; Michalegko, Lesley; Islam, Shaika; Welch, Eric W. (2021). "COVID-19 and the academy: opinions and experiences of university-based scientists in the US". Humanities and social sciences communications, v. 8, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00823-9
Jubb, Michael (2016). "Peer review: The current landscape and future trends". Learned publishing, v. 29, n. 1, pp. 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1008
Jung, Richard G.; Di-Santo, Pietro; Clifford, Cole; Prosperi-Porta, Graeme; Skanes, Stephanie; Hung, Annie; Parlow Simon; Visintini, Sarah; Ramírez F. Daniel; Simard, Trevor; Hibbert, Benjamin (2021). "Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research". Nature communications, v. 12, n. 1, 943. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21220-5
Kodvanj, Ivan; Homolak, Jan; Virag, Davor; Trkulja, Vladimir (2022). "Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues". Scientometrics, n. 127, pp. 1339-1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04249-7
Lee, Carole J.; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Zhang, Guo; Cronin, Blaise (2013). "Bias in peer review". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784
Levine, Felice J.; Nasir, Na´ilah-Suad; Ríos-Aguilar, Cecilia; Gildersleeve, Ryan-Evely; Rosich, Katherine J.; Bang, Megan; Bell, Nathan E.; Holsapple, Matthew A. (2021). Voices from the field: The impact of COVID-19 on early career scholars and doctoral students [Focus group study report]. American Educational Research Association; Spencer Foundation. https://doi.org/10.3102/aera20211
Morin, Andréanne; Helling, Britney A.; Krishnan, Seetha; Risner, Laurie E.; Walker, Nykia D.; Schwartz, Nancy B. (2022). "Research culture: Surveying the experience of postdocs in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic". Elife, v. 11, e75705. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75705
Mulligan, Adrian; Hall, Louise; Raphael, Ellen (2013). "Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 132-161. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798
Neylon, Cameron (2018). Arenas of productive conflict: Universities, peer review, conflict and knowledge. https://doi.org/10.17613/fkrd-ef72
Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Herman, Eti; Abrizah, Abdullah; Clark, David; Serbina, Galina; Sims, David; Åšwigon, Marzena; Xu, Jie; Watkinson, Anthony; Jamali, Hamid R.; Tenopir, Carol; Allard, Susie (2023). ""˜Cracks´ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers". Learned publishing, Early view. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1539
Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Watkinson, Anthony; Sims, David; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Abrizah, Abdullah; Xu, Jie; Serbina, Galina; Jamali, Hamid R. (2022a). Early career researchers in the pandemic-fashioned "˜new scholarly normality´: Voices from the research frontline. Profesional de la información, v. 31, n. 5. https://doi.org/0.3145/epi.2022.sep.10
Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Watkinson, Anthony; Sims, David; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Abrizah, Abdullah; Xu, Jie; Serbina, Galina; Jamali, Hamid R.; Tenopir, Carol; Allard, Suzie (2022b). "Early career researchers in the pandemic-fashioned "˜new scholarly normality´: a first look into the big changes and long-lasting impacts (international analysis)". Profesional de la información, v. 31, n. 4, e310418. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.jul.18
Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Abrizah, Abdullah; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie, Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Polezhaeva, Tatiana; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena (2020a). "Millennial researchers in a metric-driven scholarly world: An international study". Research evaluation, v. 29, n. 3, pp. 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa004
Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Dobrowolski, Tom; Pouchot, Stephanie (2015a). "New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation". Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 3, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150303
Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Abrizah, Abdullah; Watkinson, Anthony; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca (2018a). "Early career researchers´ quest for reputation in the digital age". Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 4, pp. 375-396. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.4.01
Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Polezhaeva, Tatiana (2020b). "A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers". Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286
Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Watkinson, Anthony; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Abrizah, Abdullah; ÅšwigoÅ„ Marzena; Polezhaeva, Tatiana (2020c). How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 6. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.14
Nicholas, David; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena (2017a). "Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices". Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102
Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Boukacem"Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Rodríguez"Bravo, Blanca; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Herman, Eti (2018b). "What publishers can take away from the latest early career researcher research". Learned publishing, v. 31, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1165
Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem"Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Herman, Eti (2020d). "Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research". Learned publishing, v. 33, n. 2, pp. 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1284
Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Clark, David; Herman, Eti (2019). "So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?". Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1232
Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Herman, Eti (2017b). "Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change". Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1098
Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Tenopir, Carol; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth (2015b). "Peer review: Still king in the digital age". Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 1, pp. 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150104
Niles, Meredith T.; Schimanski, Lesley A.; McKiernan, Erin C.; Alperin, Juan-Pablo (2020). "Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations". Plos one, v. 15, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228914
O´Brien, Anna; Graf, Chris; McKellar, Kate (2019). "How publishers and editors can help early career researchers: Recommendations from a roundtable discussion". Learned publishing, v. 32, n. 4, pp. 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1249
Pew Research Center (2010a). Millennials: A portrait of generation next. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/02/24/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change
Pew Research Center (2010b). Millennials will make online sharing in networks a lifelong habit. https://www.pewinternet.org/2010/07/09/millennials-will-make-online-sharing-in-networks-a-lifelong-habit
Publishing Research Consortium (PRC) (2016). Peer review survey 2015. London, UK: Mark Ware Consulting. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/655756/PRC-peer-review-survey-report-Final-2016-05-19.pdf
Rodríguez"Bravo, Blanca; Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Boukacem"Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Watkinson, Anthony; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena (2017). "Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers". Learned Publishing, v. 30, n. 4, pp. 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1111
Ross-Hellauer, Tony (2017). "What is Open Peer Review? A systematic review". F1000Research, v. 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
Roumbanis, Lambros (2022). "Disagreement and agonistic chance in peer review". Science, technology and human values, v. 47, n. 6, pp. 1302-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211026
Scroope, Chara (2017). "French culture: Business culture". Cultural atlas. https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/french-culture/french-culture-business-culture
Seeber, Marco (2022). "Efficacy, efficiency, and models of journal peer review: The known and unknown in the social sciences". In T.C.E. Engels; E. Kulczycki (eds.). Handbook on research assessment in the social sciences, pp. 67-82. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://10.4337/9781800372559.00011
Sevryugina, Yulia V.; Dicks, Andrew J. (2021). Publication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Biomedical preprints and peer-reviewed literature. Preprint. BioRxiv, 427563. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.427563
Sevryugina, Yulia V.; Dicks, Andrew J. (2022). "Publication practices during the COVID"19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect?". Learned publishing, v. 35, n. 4, pp. 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1483
Sharma, Kiran (2021). "Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020". Scientometrics, n. 126, pp. 8363-8374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04125-4
Schewe, Charles D.; Debevec, Kathleen; Madden, Thomas J.; Diamond, William D.; Parment, Anders; Murphy, Andrew (2013). "´If you´ve seen one, you´ve seen them all!´" Are young Millennials the same worldwide?". Journal of international consumer marketing, v. 25, n. 1, pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2013.751791
Shimray, Somipam R. (2022). "Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19". Accountability in research. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.2014327
Silbiger, Nyssa J.; Stubler, Amber D. (2019). "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM". PeerJ, n. 7, e8247. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247
Siler, Kyle; Lee, Kirby; Bero, Lisa (2015). "Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 112, n. 2, pp. 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418218112
Sí¸rensen, Lene-Tolstrup; Williams, Idongesit; Khajuria, Samant; Skouby, Knud-Erik (2017). "Millennial users in a 5G context". In: Wireless World Research Forum outlook series, n. 18. https://wwrf.ch/wp-content/publications/outlook/Outlook18.pdf
Squazzoni, Flaminio; Gandelli, Claudio (2013). "Opening the black-box of peer review: An agent-based model of scientist behaviour". Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, v. 16, n. 2, 3. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2128
Steen, R. Grant; Casadevall, Arturo; Fang, Ferric C. (2013). "Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?". PLoS one, v. 8, n. 7, e68397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068397
Tennant, Jonathan; Dugan, Jonathan M.; Graziotin, Daniel; Jacques, Damien C.; Waldner, Franí§ois; Mietchen, Daniel; Elkhatib, Yehia; Collister, Lauren B.; Pikas, Christina K.; Crick, Tom; Masuzzo, Paola; Caravaggi, Anthony; Berg, Devin R.; Niemeyer, Kyle E.; Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Mannheimer, Sara; Rigling, Lilian; Katz, Daniel S.; Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian; Pacheco-Mendoza, Josmel; Fatima, Nazeefa; Poblet, Marta; Isaakidis, Marios; Irawan, Dasapta-Erwin; Renaut, Sébastien; Madan, Christopher R.; Matthias, Lisa; Kjaer, Jesper-Norgaard; O´Donnell, Daniel-Paul; Neylon, Cameron; Kearns, Sarah; Selvaraju, Manojkumar; Colomb, Julien (2017). "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review". F1000 Research, n. 6, 1151. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
Tennant, Jonathan P.; Ross-Hellauer, Tony (2020). "The limitations to our understanding of peer review". Research integrity and peer review, v. 5, n. 1, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1
Teixeira-da-Silva, Jaime A.; Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar; Tsigaris, Panagiotis (2021). "Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature". Medicine, health care and philosophy, v. 24, pp. 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09990-z
Teixeira-da-Silva, Jaime A. (2021). "Challenges that early career researchers face in academic research and publishing: pre-and post-COVID-19 perspectives". Exchanges: The interdisciplinary research journal, v. 9, n. 1, pp. 77-106. https://doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v9i1.882
Tomkins, Andrew; Zhang, Min; Heavlin, William D. (2017). "Reviewer bias in single-versus double-blind peer review". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 114, n. 48, pp. 12708-12713. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707323114
Van-Dalen, Hendrik P.; Henkens, Kène (2012). "Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, m. 7, pp. 1282-1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22636
Willis, Jessie V.; Cobey, Kelly D.; Ramos, Janina; Chow, Ryan; Ng, Jeremy Y.; Alayche, Mohsen; Moher, David (2022a). Online training in manuscript peer review: A systematic review. medRxiv, 2022-09. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.02.22279345
Willis, Jessie V.; Ramos, Janina; Cobey, Kelly D.; Ng, Jeremy Y.; Khan, Hassan; Albert, Marc A.; Alayche, Mohsen; Moher, David (2022b). Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey, medRxiv, 2022-09. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.03.22279564
Woods, Hellen-Buckley; Brumberg, Johanna; Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang; Pinfield, Stephen; Waltman, Ludo (2023). "An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts". Wellcome Open Research, v. 7, n. 82 [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17715.2
Ziman, John M. (1968). Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science. London, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978 0 521095198
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Profesional de la información
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Dissemination conditions of the articles once they are published
Authors can freely disseminate their articles on websites, social networks and repositories
However, the following conditions must be respected:
- Only the editorial version should be made public. Please do not publish preprints, postprints or proofs.
- Along with this copy, a specific mention of the publication in which the text has appeared must be included, also adding a clickable link to the URL: http://www.profesionaldelainformacion.com
- Only the final editorial version should be made public. Please do not publish preprints, postprints or proofs.
- Along with that copy, a specific mention of the publication in which the text has appeared must be included, also adding a clickable link to the URL: http://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com
Profesional de la información journal offers the articles in open access with a Creative Commons BY license.
