The Social Systems Citation Theory (SSCT): A proposal to use the social systems theory for conceptualizing publications and their citations links
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.jul.11Keywords:
Autopoiesis, Communication, Niklas Luhmann, Publications, Citations links, Citations, Citation theory, Social systems citation theory (SSCT)Abstract
The normative theory of citing considers citations as rewarding tools to acknowledge the influence of scientific works, while the social constructivist theory of citing considers citations, for example, as persuasion tools used by authors to support their claims, and convince the scientific community that those claims are valid. Other citation theories and models have been proposed in recent years to overcome the limitations of the normative and social constructivist theories. Nevertheless, they have not been able to fully explain all citation motives of scientists (but have a certain focus). This study proposes a new theory (which we call "social systems citation theory", SSCT) that integrates previous theories and models on publications and their citation links and is mainly based on Niklas Luhmann´s "social systems theory". Luhmann´s social systems theory focuses on "communications" as the basic constituting elements of a social science system and not on humans and their motives. Humans are not part of social systems but are connected with them and irritate them. Thus, the social systems theory does not have the problem of integrating various and different motives of humans to cite in the science system. In the SSCT, authors´ motives to cite belong to psychic systems while publications and their citation links belong to the social science system. The systems operate autonomously but interact with each other: the social system operates recursively with publications and citation links. Although psychic systems stimulate or irritate the science system, they do not determine communications in the science system. In this study, we explain the SSCT and demonstrate how the theory can be used to underlie empirical bibliometric studies.
Downloads
References
Abelson, Philip H. (1980). "Scientific communication". Science, v. 209, n. 4452, pp. 60-62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.72806
Aksnes, Dag W.; Langfeldt, Liv; Wouters, Paul (2019). "Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories". Sage open, v. 9, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
Armstrong, J. Scott (1982). "Research on scientific journals: Implications for editors and authors". Journal of forecasting, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 83-104. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=marketing_papers
Baecker, Dirk (2001). "Why systems?". Theory, culture & society, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327601018001005
Barnes, S. Barry; Dolby, R. G. Alex (1970). "The scientific ethos: A deviant viewpoint". European journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600001934
Berger, Peter L.; Luckmann, Thomas (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY, USA: Doubleday. ISBN: 978 0 385058988
Bornmann, Lutz; Haunschild, Robin (2017). "Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact?". Scientometrics, v. 110, n. 2, pp. 937-943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2200-2
Bornmann, Lutz; Daniel, Hans"Dieter (2008). "What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior". Journal of documentation, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 45-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
Bornmann, Lutz; Haunschild, Robin; Boyack, Kevin; Marx, Werner; Minx, Jan C. (2022). "How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data". arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05358. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.05358.pdf
Bornmann, Lutz; Wray, K. Brad; Haunschild, Robin (2020). "Citation concept analysis (CCA): A new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper". Scientometrics, v. 122, n. 2, pp. 1051-1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2
Campanario, Juan-Miguel (1996). "Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times?". Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 47, n. 4, pp. 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199604)47:4<302::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-0
Case, Donald O.; Higgins, Georgeann M. (2000). "How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication". Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 51, n. 7, pp. 635-645. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<635::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-H
Catalini, Christian; Lacetera, Nicola; Oettl, Alexander (2015). "The incidence and role of negative citations in science". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 112, n. 45, pp. 13823-13826. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502280112
Cole, Stephen (1992). Making science. Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978 0 674543478
Cooren, Franí§ois; Seidl, David (2020). "Niklas Luhmann´s radical communication approach and its implications for research on organizational communication". Academy of management review, v. 45, n. 2, pp. 479-497. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0176
Cozzens, Susan E. (1989). "What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model". Scientometrics, v. 15, n. 5-6, pp. 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017064
Dahler-Larsen, Peter (2012). The evaluation society. Standford. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 804788618
Davis, Philip M. (2009). "Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation". Learned publishing, v. 22, n. 1, pp. 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108x378712
Frandsen, Tove-Faver; Nicolaisen, Jeppe (2017). "Citation behavior: A large-scale test of the persuasion by name-dropping hypothesis". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 5, pp. 1278-1284. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23746
Fuchs, Stephan (1992). The professional quest for truth: A social theory of science and knowledge. New York, NY, USA: State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978 0 791409244
Gí¶rke, Alexander; Scholl, Armin (2006). "Niklas Luhmann´s theory of social systems and journalism research". Journalism studies, v. 7, n. 4, pp. 644-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600758066
Haunschild, Robin; Bornmann, Lutz (2020). "Which papers cited which tweets? An empirical analysis based on Scopus data". arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.11318. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.11318
Janke, Norman C. (1967). "Abuses of citation indexing". Science, v. 156, n. 3777, pp. 890-892. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3777.892
Judge, Timothy A.; Cable, Daniel M.; Colbert, Amy E.; Rynes, Sara L. (2007). " What causes a management article to be cited - article, author, or journal?". The Academy of Management journal, v. 50, n. 3, pp. 491-506. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525577
Klamer, Arjo; Van-Dalen, Hendrik P. (2002). "Attention and the art of scientific publishing". Journal of economic methodology, v. 9, n. 3, pp. 289-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178022000015104
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978 0 226458120
Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978 0 674792913
Lau, Felix (2005). Die Form der Paradoxie. Eine Einfí¼hrung in die Mathematik und Philosophie der "˜Laws of form´ von G. Spencer Brown. Heidelberg, Germany: Carl-Auer. ISBN: 978 3 896703521
Leydesdorff, Loet (1998). "Theories of citation?". Scientometrics, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458391
Leydesdorff, Loet (2001). A sociological theory of communication. The self-organization of the knowledge-based society. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Universal Publishers. ISBN: 978 1 581126952
Leydesdorff, Loet (2009). "Luhmann reconsidered: Steps towards an empirical research programme in the sociology of communication?". In: Grant, Colin B. (ed.). Beyond universal pragmatics: Essays in the philosophy of communication. Oxford, UK: Peter Lang, pp. 149-176. ISBN: 978 3 039119929
Leydesdorff, Loet; Hoegl, Franz (2020). "The evolutionary dynamics of expectations: Interactions among codes in inter-human communications". Biosystems, v. 198, 104236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104236
Liu, Mengxiong (1993a). "Progress in documentation - the complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies". Journal of documentation, v. 49, n. 4, pp. 370-408. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026920
Liu, Mengxiong (1993b). "A study of citing motivation of Chinese scientists". Journal of information science, v. 19, n. 1, pp. 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159301900103
Luhmann, Niklas (1986). "The Autopoiesis of social systems". In: Geyer, Felix; Van-der-Zouwen, Johannes (eds.). Sociocybernetic paradoxes: Observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems. London, UK: Sage, pp. 172-192. ISBN: 978 0 803997356
Luhmann, Niklas (1992). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. ISBN: 978 3 518 28601 2
Luhmann, Niklas (2006a). Das Kind als Medium der Erziehung. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. ISBN: 978 3 518068564
Luhmann, Niklas (2006b). Einfí¼hrung in die Systemtheorie (3rd ed.). Heidelberg, Germany: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag. ISBN: 978 3 896704597
Luhmann, Niklas (2006c). Organisation und Entscheidung (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS. ISBN: ISBN: 978 3 322 97093 0
Luhmann, Niklas (2012a). Theory of society (vol. 2). Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 804771603
Luhmann, Niklas (2012b). Theory of society (vol. 1). Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 804739504
Macfarlane, Bruce; Cheng, Ming (2008). "Communism, universalism and disinterestedness: Re-examining contemporary support among academics for Merton´s scientific norms". Journal of academic ethics, v. 6, n. 1, pp. 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y
Mcinnis, Raymond G.; Symes, Dal (1988). "David Riesman and the concept of bibliographic citation". College & research libraries, v. 49, n. 5, pp. 387-399. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_49_05_387
Merton, Robert K. (1968a). "The Matthew effect in science". Science, v. 159, n. 3810, pp. 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Merton, Robert K. (1968b). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY, USA: Simon and Schuster. ISBN: 978 0 029211304
Merton, Robert K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago press. ISBN: 978 0 226520926
Merton, Robert K. (1988). "The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property". ISIS, v. 79, n. 4, pp. 606-623. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/merton/matthewii.pdf
Meyer, Samantha; Gibson, Barry; Ward, Paul (2015). "Niklas Luhmann: Social systems theory and the translation of public health research". In: Collyer, Fran (ed.). The Palgrave handbook of social theory in health, illness and medicine (pp. 340-354). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK. ISBN: 978 1 137 35561 4
Mingers, John; Leydesdorff, Loet (2015). "A review of theory and practice in scientometrics". European journal of operational research, v. 246, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002
Moed, Henk F. (2009). "New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation". Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, v. 57, n. 1, pp. 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5
Nicolaisen, Jeppe (2004). Social behavior and scientific practice-missing pieces of the citation puzzle. PhD, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Denmark. https://static-curis.ku.dk/portal/files/47025985/jeppe_nicolaisen_phd.pdf
Nicolaisen, Jeppe (2007). "Citation analysis". Annual review of information science and technology, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 609-641. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120
Parsons, Talcott (1951). The social system. New York, NY, USA: Free Press. ISBN: 978 0 415060554
Popper, Karl R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge. ISBN: 978 1 614277439
Ràfols, Ismael; Noyons, Ed; Confraria, Hugo; Ciarli, Tommaso (2021). Visualising plural mappings of science for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/yfqbd
Riviera, Emanuela (2013). "Scientific communities as autopoietic systems: The reproductive function of citations". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 7, pp. 1442-1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22826
Seidl, David (2004). Luhmann´s theory of autopoietic social systems. Munich Business Research. https://www.zog.bwl.uni-muenchen.de/files/mitarbeiter/paper2004_2.pdf
Silva, Marcos-Aurelio S. D.; Sibertin-Blanc, Christophe (2017). "A stylized model of individual-society interaction based on Luhmann´s theory". In: Pereira-Dimuro, Graí§aliz; Antunes, Luis. International workshop on multi-agent systems and agent-based simulation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91587-6
Simon, Fritz B. (1988). Unterschiede, die Unterschiede machen. Klinische Epistemologie: Grundlage einer systemischen Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik. Berlin, Germany: Springer. ISBN: 978 3 518 28696 8
Skov, Flemming; Wang, Tobias; Andersen, Jens-Peter (2018). "Science maps and strategic thinking". In: Wouters, Paul. Proceedings of the science and technology indicators conference 2018 Leiden "Science, technology and innovation indicators in transition". Leiden, The Netherlands: University of Leiden. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2714995/view
Small, Henry G. (1978). "Cited documents as concept symbols". Social studies of science, v. 8, n. 3, pp. 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277800800305
Small, Henry; Boyack, Kevin W.; Klavans, Richard (2019). "Citations and certainty: A new interpretation of citation counts". Scientometrics, v. 118, n. 3, pp. 1079-1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03016-z
Spencer-Brown, G. (1969). Laws of form. New York, NY, USA: Dutton. ISBN: 978 0 963989901
Stichweh, Rudolf (2011). "Niklas Luhmann". In: Ritzer, George; Stepnisky, Jeffrey. The Wiley"Blackwell companion to major social theorists, v. 1, pp. 287-309.
Tahamtan, Iman; Bornmann, Lutz (2018a). "Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature". Journal of informetrics, v. 12, n. 1, pp. 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.002
Tahamtan, Iman; Bornmann, Lutz (2018b). "Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?". Journal of informetrics, v. 12, n. 3, pp. 906-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.005
Teplitskiy, Misha; Duede, Eamon; Menietti, Michael; Lakhani, Karim (2018). "Why (almost) everything we know about citations is wrong: Evidence from authors". In: Wouters, Paul. Proceedings of the science and technology indicators conference 2018 Leiden "Science, technology and innovation indicators in transition". Leiden, the Netherlands: University of Leiden. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2730062/view
Turner, Stephen (2007). "Scientific norms/counternorms". In: Ritze, George; Ryan, J. M.; Thorn, B. (eds.). The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss052
Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (1998). "In matters of quantitative studies of science. The fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much". Scientometrics, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458401
Weingart, Peter (2003). Wissenschaftssoziologie. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript. ISBN: 978 3 8394 0037 1
Weingart, Peter; Pansegrau, Petra; Winterhager, Matthias (1998). Arbeitsbericht zum Lehrforschungsprojekt: Die Bedeutung von Medien fí¼r die Reputation von Wissenschaftlern. Bielefeld, Germany: Universití¤t Bielefeld, Fakultí¤t fí¼r Soziologie. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1877526
White, Howard D. (2004). "Reward, persuasion, and the Sokal hoax: A study in citation identities". Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 1, pp. 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027313.91401.9b
Williams, Liz (2012). "Karl Popper, the enemy of certainty, part 1: A rejection of empiricism". The Guardian, 10 September. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/10/karl-popper-enemy-uncertainty
Wouters, Paul (1998). "The signs of science". Scientometrics, v. 41, n. 1-2, pp. 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457980
Wouters, Paul (1999). "Beyond the holy grail: From citation theory to indicator theories". Scientometrics, v. 44, n. 3, pp. 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458496
Wyatt, Sally; Milojević, Stasa; Park, Han Woo; Leydesdorff, Loet (2017). "The intellectual and practical contributions of scientometrics to STS". In: Felt, Ulrike; Fouché, Rayvon; Miller, Clark A.; Smith-Doerr, Laurel. Handbook of science and technology studies, pp. 87-112. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. ISBN: 978 0 262035682 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2588336
Yin, Ylan; Gao, Jian; Jones, Benjamin F.; Wang, Dashun (2021). "Coevolution of policy and science during the pandemic". Science, v. 371, n. 6525, pp. 128-130. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3084
Zahavi, Amotz (1975). "Mate selection - a selection for a handicap". Journal of theoretical biology, v. 53, n. 1, pp. 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
Zahavi, Amotz; Zahavi, Avishag (1999). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin´s puzzle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 195129144
Ziman, John (2002). Real science: What it is, and what it means (vol. 27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978 0521893107
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Profesional de la información
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Dissemination conditions of the articles once they are published
Authors can freely disseminate their articles on websites, social networks and repositories
However, the following conditions must be respected:
- Only the editorial version should be made public. Please do not publish preprints, postprints or proofs.
- Along with this copy, a specific mention of the publication in which the text has appeared must be included, also adding a clickable link to the URL: http://www.profesionaldelainformacion.com
- Only the final editorial version should be made public. Please do not publish preprints, postprints or proofs.
- Along with that copy, a specific mention of the publication in which the text has appeared must be included, also adding a clickable link to the URL: http://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com
Profesional de la información journal offers the articles in open access with a Creative Commons BY license.
