Spanish scientific output in Communication indexed on Web of Science: contextualization and presence in the Shanghai Ranking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.ene.19Keywords:
Communication, Web of Science, Spanish universities, Communication schools, Spain, Bibliometrics, University ranings, ARWU, Scientivid output, Scientific production, Research assessmentAbstract
The field of Communication in Spain is analyzed, contextualizing Spanish output at a global and local level between the years 2000 and 2020. Based on a descriptive bibliometric analysis of the Communication category of the Social Sciences Citation Index database, part of Web of Science, the impact of the main countries is identified. The weight of the output in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) database between 2015 and 2020 is also studied. An analysis of the output by universities in Spain for the period 2010-2020 is also carried out, comparing it with the impact and the works in the first quartile. The results reveal that Spain has been the fourth country in terms of output in Communication in the last decade and that Austria stands out as the country whose works have the greatest impact. It is also observed that 67% of Spain´s works in Communication are published in journals that are indexed in ESCI. The impact of Spanish universities is very close to the world average. The Universitat Pompeu Fabra stands out, publishing the most articles and, furthermore, being the Spanish university with most papers in the first quartile of the JCR in Communication between 2010 and 2020. The study of the Shanghai Ranking by area includes eight Spanish universities, only three of which have output in Communication that comes mainly from professors in this area. The role of the Spanish journals Comunicar and Profesional de la información is notable, as they publish a large fraction of the output by Spanish universities in the Communication field. Finally, this paper presents the challenges of research in Communication, as well as those related to its bibliometric analysis, and a reflection on the problems that affect scientific production and research in this subject area.
Downloads
References
Baas, Jeroen; Boyack, Kevin; Ioannides, John P. A. (2021). "August 2021 data-update for "˜Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators´". Mendeley data, v3. https://doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.3
Baladrón-Pazos, Antonio; Correyero-Ruiz, Beatriz (2012). "Futuro de las revistas científicas de comunicación en España". Profesional de la informacion, v. 21, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.ene.05
Craig, Robert T. (1999). "Communication theory as a field". Communication theory, v. 9, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00166.x
De-Miguel, Amando (1966). "Religious attitudes of Spanish youth". Public opinion quaterly, v. 30, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/30.3.438
Glí¤nzel, Wolfgang; Moed, Henk F. (2002). "Journal impact measures in bibliometric research". Scientometrics, v. 53, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014848323806
Henderson, Bill (1984). "The small book press: A cultural essential". Library quarterly, v. 54, n. 1. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/601438
Marzal-Felici, Javier; Rodríguez-Serrano, Aarón; Soler-Campillo, María (2021). "Comparación del impacto de libros y artículos de investigadores españoles de comunicación a través de Google Scholar en 2019". Revista española de documentación científica, v. 44, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.3989/REDC.2021.1.1744
Montero, Julio (2021). "Los estudios de comunicación y la historia de la comunicación". En: IX Congreso internacional de investigación en comunicación e información digital.
Moreno-Delgado, Alicia; Gorraiz, Juan; Repiso, Rafael (2021). "Assessing the publication output on country level in the research field communication using Garfield´s Impact Factor". Scientometrics, v. 126, n. 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04006-w
Morillo, Fernanda; Bordons, María; Gómez-Caridad, Isabel (2003). "Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 13. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326
Okubo, Yoshiko (1997). "Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems. Methods and examples". OECD science, technology and industry working papers, n. 1997/01, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/bibliometric-indicators-and-analysis-of-research-systems_208277770603
Prathap, Gangan (2019). "Shanghai Ranking´s global ranking of academic subjects 2018". Current science, v. 116, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i2/232-238
Ramos-Serrano, Marina; Fernández-Gómez, Jorge-David; Pineda, Antonio (2018). ""˜Follow the closing of the campaign on streaming´: The use of Twitter by Spanish political parties during the 2014 European elections". New media and society, v. 20, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730
Repiso, Rafael; Berlanga, Inmaculada; Said-Hung, Elías; Castillo-Esparcia, Antonio (2020). "Titularidades y cátedras en Comunicación en España (2000-2019). Distribución, ritmos de promoción, transferencia entre universidades y endogamia". Profesional de la informacion, v. 29, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.22
Repiso, Rafael; Montero, Julio (2019). "Edición impresa tradicional, digital, bajo demanda y auto-sufragada. Cuatro modelos de edición de libros que requieren ser evaluados de manera diferente". Bibliotecas. Anales de investigación, v. 15, n. 1.
Repiso, Rafael; Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2014). "Comunicación y documentación: dos disciplinas convergentes pero distintas". Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 8, pp. 225-229. https://thinkepi.profesionaldelainformacion.com/index.php/ThinkEPI/article/view/29585
Repiso, Rafael; Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2016). "Características e implicaciones de la base dedatos Emerging Sources Citation Index (Thomson Reuters): las revistas en estado transitorio". AnuarioThinkEPI, v. 10, pp. 234-236. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2016.46
Romano, Vicente (1986). "Power, cult and kitsch". Media, culture and society, v. 8, n. 2, pp. 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344386008002006
Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; García-Moreno-Torres, José; Herrera, Francisco (2011). "Rankings ISI de las universidades españolas según campos científicos: descripción y resultados". El profesional de la información, v. 20, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.ene.14
Trabadela-Robles, Javier; Nuño-Moral, María-Victoria; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2020). "Análisis de dominios científicos nacionales en Comunicación (Scopus, 2003-2018)". Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 4, e290418. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.18
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Dissemination conditions of the articles once they are published
Authors can freely disseminate their articles on websites, social networks and repositories
However, the following conditions must be respected:
- Only the editorial version should be made public. Please do not publish preprints, postprints or proofs.
- Along with this copy, a specific mention of the publication in which the text has appeared must be included, also adding a clickable link to the URL: http://www.profesionaldelainformacion.com
- Only the final editorial version should be made public. Please do not publish preprints, postprints or proofs.
- Along with that copy, a specific mention of the publication in which the text has appeared must be included, also adding a clickable link to the URL: http://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com
Profesional de la información journal offers the articles in open access with a Creative Commons BY license.