Opinion of television managers about their viewers and their interest in science: audience images and lack of scientific content on television

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.nov.09

Palabras clave:

Audiences, Science communication, Science contents, Science television, General audiences, Spanish television audiences, Attitudes towards science, Audience images, Television professionals, General television, Spanish television, Producers, Directors, Programmers

Resumen

Science does not occupy a prominent place on Spanish television, possibly due to those in charge of the creation, production, organization, and programming of content. Previous research has shown that television executives have mental images of their audiences that they actively use in their professional practice. This study adopts a mixed, qualitative-quantitative method to determine the beliefs of Spanish television executives regarding the attitudes of their audiences toward scientific programs and content. The study began with two focus groups, each made up of five professionals, to identify a wide range of attitudes. A Likert-scale questionnaire was then applied to examine the level of agreement with those attitudes among 450 employees of different types of private and public networks from six different regions of Spain. The main findings are that Spanish television managers do not believe that their viewers enjoy scientific topics or have any interest in them. However, professionals with previous experience of the production of scientific content tend to have a slightly more positive attitude about the opinion of general audiences regarding televised science. Hence, familiarity with televised science positively impacts the appreciation of such content on television. This research highlights the fundamental role of network managers in explaining the lack of science on Spanish media. Its results are coherent with previous studies confirming that TV professionals have preconceived images about their audiences that are derived from their own preferences and that guide their decisions. 

Citas

Berrocal-Gonzalo, Salomé; Redondo-García, Marta; Martín-Jiménez, Virginia; Campos-Domínguez, Eva (2014). “La presencia del infoentretenimiento en los canales generalistas de la TDT española”. Revista latina de comunicación social, v. 69, pp. 85-103. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1002

Besley, John C.; Tanner, Andrea H. (2011). “What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate”. Science communication, v. 33, pp. 239-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010386972

Boholm, Åsa (1998). “Visual images and risk messages: Commemorating Chernobyl”. Risk decision and policy, v. 3, pp. 125-143.

Brake, David R. (2009). As if nobody’s reading’?: The imagined audience and socio-technical biases in personal blogging practice in the UK. PhD thesis. London School of Economics and Political Science, UK. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/4

Caldwell, John T. (2008). Production culture: Industrial reflexivity and critical practice in film and television. Durham: Duke University Press. ISBN: 978 0 82234092 https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388968

Calsamiglia, Helena; López-Ferrero, Carmen (2003). “Role and position of scientific voices: reported speech in the media”. Discourse studies, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005002308

Calsamiglia, Helena; Van-Dijk, Teun A. (2004). “Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genome”. Discourse and society, v. 15, n. 4, pp. 369-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504043705

Cámara, Montaña; Muñoz-Van-den-Eynde, Ana; López-Cerezo, José A. (2017). “Attitudes towards science among Spanish citizens: The case of critical engagers”. Public understanding of science, v. 27, n. 6, pp. 690-707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517719172

Cano-Orón, Lorena; Portalés-Oliva, Marta; Llorca-Abad, Germán (2017). “La divulgación de salud en la televisión pública: el caso de RTVE en 2016”. adComunica. Revista científica de estrategias, tendencias e innovación en comunicación, n. 14, pp. 201-228. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2017.14.11

Coca, Juan R.; Valero-Matas, Jesús A. (2010). “Televisión y divulgación tecnocientífica. Análisis de algunos programas españoles”. Hologramática, v. 2, n. 13, pp. 55-71. http://www.cienciared.com.ar/ra/usr/3/1008/hologramatica13_v2pp55_71.pdf

Cortiñas-Rovira, Sergi; Alonso-Marcos, Felipe; Pont-Sorribes, Carles; Escribà-Sales, Eudald (2015). “Science journalists’ perceptions and attitudes to pseudoscience in Spain”. Public understanding of science, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 450-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514558991

Creswell, John W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 0761924426

Creswell, John W.; Plano-Clark, Vicki L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. California: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978 1 483344379

Dornfeld, Barry (1998). Producing public television, producing public culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978 0 691044675 https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19fvzmd

Draper, Jimmy (2014). “Theorizing creative agency through ‘discerned savvy’: a tool for the critical study of media industries”. Media, culture & society, v. 36, n. 8, pp. 1118-1133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714545000

Fecyt (2015). Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología 2014. Madrid: Fecyt. https://icono.fecyt.es/sites/default/files/filepublicaciones/18/publicacion_epscyt2014.pdf

Fecyt (2018). Encuesta de percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología 2018. Madrid: Fecyt. https://icono.fecyt.es/informes-y-publicaciones/percepcion-social-de-la-ciencia-y-la-tecnologia-en-espana

Francescutti, Luis-Pablo (2014). “Los públicos de la ciencia”. Cuadernos de la Fundación Dr. Antonio Esteve, n. 31. https://www.esteve.org/capitulos/documento-completo-12/?doing_wp_cron=1583994377.6626479625701904296875

Francés-Domènec, Miquel; Llorca-Abad, Germán (2017). “Retos de la TDT local como base para una televisión de proximidad valenciana”. In: Francés-Domènec, Miquel; Orozco-Gómez, Guillermo (coords.). La televisión de proximidad en el entorno transmedia. Madrid: Síntesis, pp. 203-224. ISBN: 978 84 90774694

Gans, Herbert J. (1957). “The creator-audience relationship in the mass media: An analysis of movie making”. In: Rosenberg, Bernard; White, David M. (eds.). Mass culture: The popular arts in America. Glencoe: The Free Press, pp. 314-324. ISBN: 978 0 029270806

Gitlin, Todd (1983). Inside prime time. New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN: 978 0 203977293 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977293

Greenberg, Michael R.; Sachsman, David B.; Sandman, Peter M.; Salomone, Kandice L. (1989). “Risk, drama and geography in coverage of environmental risk by network TV”. The journalism quarterly, v. 66, n. 2, pp. 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600201

Greenwood, Mary-Rita C.; Riordan, Donna-Gerardi (2001). “Civic scientist/civic duty”. Science communication, v. 23, n. 1, pp. 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023001003

Grosso-Mesa, Julio (2013). “La ciencia en televisión: Redes, el modelo divulgativo de Eduard Punset”. Periodística, n. 15, pp. 87-100. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.3008.02.30

Grosso-Mesa, Julio (2017). La ciencia en televisión: Redes, el modelo divulgativo de Eduard Punset. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada. http://hera.ugr.es/tesisugr/26729532.pdf

Gutiérrez-Lozano, Juan-Francisco (2002). “La divulgación científica en la programación de las televisiones generalistas”. Comunicar, v. 19, pp. 43-48. https://doi.org/10.3916/C19-2002-08

Havens, Timothy (2013). Black television travels: African American media around the globe. New York: New York University Press. ISBN: 0814737218

Hesmondhalgh, David; Baker, Sarah (2011). Creative labour. Media work in three cultural industries. London: Routledge. ISBN: 978 0 415677738

Höijer, Birgitta (2010). “Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change”. Public understanding of science, v. 19, n. 6, pp. 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509348863

Jones, Allan (2011). “Mary Adams and the producer’s role in early BBC science broadcasts”. Public understanding of science, v. 21, n. 8, pp. 968-983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511419450

Lehmkuhl, Markus (2014). “Current state and challenges of science in today’s TV: A look at the interplay between supply and demand on European media markets”. Actes d’història de la ciència i de la tècnica, v. 7, pp. 89-112. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.2006.01.186

Lehmkuhl, Markus; Boyadjieva, Pepka; Cunningham, Yvonne; Karamanidou, Christina; Mörä, Tuomo (2016). “Audience reach of science on television in 10 European countries: An analysis of people-meter data”. Public understanding of science, v. 25, n. 2, pp. 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514536295

Lehmkuhl, Markus; Karamanidou, Christina; Mörä, Tuomo; Petkova, Kristina; Trench, Brian (2012). “Scheduling science on television: A comparative analysis of the representations of science in 11 European countries”. Public understanding of science, v. 21, n. 8, pp. 1002-1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511436070

León, Bienvenido (2002). “Divulgar la ciencia en televisión: problemas y oportunidades”. In: Façeira, Maria-João. A divulgação científica nos medios. Avanca: Cine-clube Avanca, pp. 73-79.

León, Bienvenido (2008). “Science related information in European television: a study of prime-time news”. Public understanding of science, v. 17, n. 4, pp. 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625056073089

Mayer, Vicky (2016). “The places where audience studies and production studies meet”. Television and new media, v. 17, n. 8, pp. 706-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416652482

Moreno-Castro, Carolina (2004). “Evolución y tendencias de los formatos televisivos de divulgación científica en España”. Quaderns de filologia. Estudis de comunicació, v. 2, pp. 121-136.

Moreno-Castro, Carolina (2007). “Las fronteras de la ciencia y la tecnología: entre el público y los medios de comunicación”. In: Fecyt (ed.). Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología en España 2006. Madrid: Fecyt, pp. 81-104. https://icono.fecyt.es/informes-y-publicaciones/percepcion-social-de-la-ciencia-y-la-tecnologia-en-espana

Moreno-Castro, Carolina (2009). “Los medios, el público y la ciencia. Una relación que no progresa adecuadamente”. In: Fecyt (ed.). Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología en España 2008. Madrid: Fecyt, pp. 21-37. https://icono.fecyt.es/informes-y-publicaciones/percepcion-social-de-la-ciencia-y-la-tecnologia-en-espana

Morgan, David L.; Krueger, Richard A. (1997). Focus group kit: Volumes 1-6. London: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 0761907602

Myers, Greg (2003). “Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries”. Discourse studies, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005002006

Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Bustamante, Rebecca M.; Nelson, Judith A. (2010). “Mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments”. Journal of mixed methods research, v. 4, n. 1, pp. 56-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809355805

Open Society Institute (2008). Television across Europe: more channels, less independence. Budapest: Open Society Institute. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/uploads/3acad107-4566-48d6-bc17-1e6e98c00b41/1fullpublication_20080429_0.pdf

Oring, Stuart A. (1999). “A call for visual literacy”. School arts, v. 99, n. 8, pp. 58-59. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/A+CALL+FOR+VISUAL+LITERACY.-a061524607

Osborne, Jonathan; Simon, Shirley; Collins, Sue (2003). “Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications”. International journal of science education, v. 25, n. 9, pp. 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Poliakoff, Ellen; Webb, Thomas L. (2007). “What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities?”. Science communication, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 242-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009

Pool, Ithiel-De-Sola; Schulman, Irwin (1959). “Newsmen’s fantasies, audiences, and newswriting”. Public opinion quarterly, v. 23, n. 2, pp. 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1086/266860

Revuelta, Gemma; Corchero, Cristina (2015). “Acceso a la información sobre ciencia y tecnología: Evolución e implicaciones”. In: Fecyt (ed.). Percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología 2014. Madrid: Fecyt, pp. 99-129. https://icono.fecyt.es/sites/default/files/filepublicaciones/18/publicacion_epscyt2014.pdf

Revuelta, Gemma; Mazzonetto, Marzia (2008). “La ciència i la tecnologia a la televisió d’àmbit català”. Quaderns del CAC, v. 30, pp. 69-80. https://www.cac.cat/sites/default/files/2019-01/Q30_Revuelta_Mazzonetto.pdf

Ross, Philippe (2011). “Is there an expertise of production? The case of new media producers”. New media & society, v. 13, n. 6, pp. 912-928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385393

Ross, Philippe (2014). “Were producers and audiences ever separate? Conceptualizing media production as social situation”. Television and new media, v. 15, n. 2, pp. 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412454686

Salvador, Vicent (2002). “Discurso periodístico y gestión social de los conocimientos: algunas observaciones sobre la didacticidad”. Anàlisi, n. 28, pp. 107-120. https://raco.cat/index.php/Analisi/article/view/15105

Schramm, Wilbur; Danielson, Wayne (1958). “Anticipated audiences as determinants of recall”. Journal of abnormal and social psychology, v. 56, n. 2, pp. 282-283. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046100

Seguí-Simarro, José-María; Poza-Luján, José-Luis; Mulet-Salort, José-Miguel (2015). Estrategias de divulgación científica. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València. ISBN: 978 84 90483190 https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/66785/TOC_6206_01_01.pdf?sequence=7

Sheppard, Stephen R. J. (2005). “Landscape visualization and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behavior”. Environmental science & policy, v. 8, n. 6, pp. 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002

Soto-Sanfiel, María-Teresa; Latorre, José-Ignacio (2014). “Uncovering the attitudes towards science, scientific contents and scientists of mass media communication professionals”. Diálogos de la comunicación, v. 88, pp. 1-23.

Soto-Sanfiel, María-Teresa; Villegas-Simón, Isabel (2018). “Actitudes de los profesionales de la televisión española sobre la ciencia en la televisión y la divulgación científica”. Communication papers, v. 7, n. 13, pp. 11-30. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/cp.v7i13.21982

Wickham, Hadley; Averick, Mara; Bryan, Jennifer; Chang, Winston; McGowan, Lucy-D’Agostino; François, Romain; Grolemund, Garrett; Hayes, Alex; Henry, Lionel; Hester, Jim; Kuhn, Max; Pedersen, Thomas-Lin; Miller, Evan; Bache, Stephan M.; Müller, Kirill; Ooms, Jeroen; Robinson, David; Seidel, Dana P.; Spinu, Vitalie; Takahashi, Kohske; Vaughan, Davis; Wilke, Claus; Woo, Kara; Yutani, Hiroaki (2019). “Welcome to the tidyverse”. Journal of open-source software, v. 4, n. 43. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686

Zafirau, Steve (2009). “Audience knowledge and the everyday lives of cultural producers in Hollywood”. In: Mayer, Vicki; Banks, Miranda J.; Caldwell, John T. (eds.). Production studies: Cultural studies of media industries. London: Routledge, pp. 190-202. ISBN: 978 0 203879597 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879597

Zimmerman, Claire; Bauer, Raymond A. (1956). “The effect of an audience upon what is remembered”. Public opinion quarterly, v. 20, pp. 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1086/266612

Publicado

2021-11-23

Cómo citar

Soto-Sanfiel, M. T., Villegas-Simón, I., & Angulo-Brunet, A. (2021). Opinion of television managers about their viewers and their interest in science: audience images and lack of scientific content on television. Profesional De La Información, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.nov.09

Número

Sección

Artículos de investigación / Research articles

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.