The Shanghai Global Ranking of Academic Subjects: Room for improvement



Palabras clave:

ARWU, Shanghai Ranking, Academic subjects, Categories, WoS, JCR, Topics, Issues, Disciplines, Rankings, Classifications, Universities, Higher Education, Institutions, Bibliometrics, Research performance, Research evaluation, Critical perspective, Flaws, Indicators, Global South


Global university rankings have achieved public popularity as they are portrayed as an objective measure of the quality of higher education institutions. One of the latest rankings is the Shanghai Global Ranking of Academic Subjects, which classifies institutions according to five fields –Engineering, Life Sciences, Medical Sciences, Natural Sciences and Social Sciences– which are divided into 54 subjects. Despite being introduced in 2017, no study has analyzed the methodology applied by this ranking. The results of our analysis show that the methodology currently used by the Shanghai Global Ranking of Academic Subjects presents several issues, which negatively affect a large proportion of universities around the world. Needless to say, if the Shanghai Global Ranking of Academic Subjects is meant to be global, it needs to expand its surveys to countries located in the Global South.



Billaut, Jean-Charles; Bouyssou, Denis; Vincke, Philippe (2010). “Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? An MCDM view”. Scientometrics, v. 84, n. 1, pp. 237-263.

DORA (2015). San Francisco declaration on research assessment.

Fauzi, Muhammad-Ashraf; Tan, Christine-Nya-Ling; Daud, Mahyuddin; Awalludin, Muhammad-Mukhtar-Noor (2020). “University rankings: A review of methodological flaws”. Issues in educational research, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 79-96.

Fernández-Cano, Antonio; Curiel-Marín, Elvira; Torralbo-Rodríguez, Manuel; Vallejo-Ruiz, Mónica (2018). “Questioning the Shanghai Ranking methodology as a tool for the evaluation of universities: an integrative review”. Scientometrics, v. 116, n. 3, pp. 2069-2083.

Fernández-Tuesta, Esteban; García-Zorita, Carlos; Romera-Ayllón, Rosario; Sanz-Casado, Elías (2019). “Does a country/region’s economic status affect its universities presence in international rankings?”. Journal of data and information science, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 56-78.

Florian, Razvan V. (2007). “Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities”. Scientometrics, v. 72, n. 1, pp. 25-32.

González-Riaño, María-Guadalupe; Repiso, Rafael; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2014). “Repercusión de los rankings universitarios en la prensa española”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 37, n. 3, e055.

Kabeer, Naila (2005). “Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal”. Gender and development, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 13-24.

Kehm, Barbara M. (2014). “Global university rankings. Impacts and unintended side effects”. European journal of education, v. 49, n. 1, pp. 102-112.

Krauskopf, Erwin (2011). “The unforeseen impact of meeting abstracts on cancer research”. Annals of oncology, v. 22, n. 10, 2342.

Krauskopf, Erwin (2013). “Standardization of the institutional address”. Scientometrics, v. 94, pp. 1313-1315.

Marginson, Simon (2014). “University rankings and social science”. European journal of education, v. 49, n. 1, pp. 45-59.

Marginson, Simon; Van-der-Wende, Marijk (2007) “To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education”. Journal of studies in international education, v. 11, n. 3/4, pp. 306-329.

Mongeon, Philippe; Paul-Hus, Adèle (2015). “The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis”. Scientometrics, v. 106, pp. 213-228.

Olcay, Gokcen-Arkali; Bulu, Melih (2017). “Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible? A review of university rankings”. Technological forecasting & social change, v. 123, pp. 153-160.

Ordóñez-Matamoros, Gonzalo; Vernot-López, Michelle; Moreno-Mattar, Ornella; Orozco, Luis-Antonio (2020). “Exploring the effects of North-South and South-South research collaboration in emerging economies, the Colombian case”. Review of policy research, v. 37, n. 2, pp. 174-200.

Pandiella-Dominique, Andrés; Moreno-Lorente, Luis; García-Zorita, José-Carlos; Sanz-Casado, Elías (2018). “Modelo de estimación de los indicadores del Academic Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai Ranking) scores”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 41, n. 2, e204.

Pusser, Brian; Marginson, Simon (2013). “University rankings in critical perspective”. The journal of higher education, v. 84, n. 4, pp. 544-568.

Ridgeway, Cecilia L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. United Kingdom. Oxford University Online. ISBN: 978 0 199755783

Rochmyaningsih, Dyna (2018). “Showcase scientists from the Global South”. Nature, v. 553, 251.

Sauder, Michael; Espeland, Wendy-Nelson (2009). “The discipline of rankings: tight coupling and organization change”. American sociological review, v. 74, n. 1, pp. 63-82.

Snowball, Jen D.; Shackleton, Charlie M. (2018). “Factors enabling and constraining research in a small research-intensive South African university”. Research evaluation, v. 27, n. 2, pp. 119-131.

Stoet, Gijsbert; Geary, David C. (2018). “The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education”. Psychological science, v. 29, n. 4, pp. 581-593.

Van-der-Stocken, Tom; Hugé, Jean; Deboelpaep, Evelien; Vanhove, Maarten P. M.; Janssens-de-Bisthoven, Luc; Koedam, Nico (2016). “Academic capacity building: holding up the mirror”. Scientometrics, v. 106, n. 3, pp. 1277-1280.

Van-der-Wende, Marijk; Westerheijden, Don (2009). “Rankings and classifications: the need for a multidimensional approach”. In: Van-Vught, Frans (ed.). Mapping the higher education landscape. Towards a European classification of higher education. The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 71-87.

Van-Leeuwen, Thed; Costas, Rodrigo; Calero-Medina, Clara; Visser, Martijn S. (2013). “The role of editorial material in bibliometric performance assessments”. Scientometrics, v. 95, pp. 817-828.

Van-Leeuwen, Thed N.; Moed, Henk F.; Tijseen, Robert J. W.; Visser, Martijn S.; Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (2001). “Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance”. Scientometrics, v. 51, pp. 335-346.

Van-Rann, Anthony F. J (2005). “Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods”. Scientometrics, v. 62, pp. 133-143.

Wiesmann, Urs; Dayer, Océane 2019. “Research for Sustainable development goals”. GAIA, v. 28, n. 2, pp. 88-89.

Williams, Ross; Van-Dyke, Nina 2008. “Reputation and reality: Ranking major disciplines in Australian universities”. Higher education, v. 56, n. 1, pp. 1-28.




Cómo citar

Krauskopf, E. (2021). The Shanghai Global Ranking of Academic Subjects: Room for improvement. Profesional De La Información, 30(4).


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.