Altmetría como especialidad de investigación (Dimensions, 2005-2018)
Palabras clave:
Altmetría, Altmétricas, Citas, Análisis de redes de citas, Análisis de cocitación, Visualización de redes bibliométricas, Medios sociales académicos, Indicadores, Autores, Revistas científicas, Comunicación científica, Mapas de la ciencia, Dimensions, CitResumen
Se analiza la bibliografía científica sobre altmétricas publicada entre 2005 y 2018. La estructura general de su paisaje intelectual se caracteriza en términos de concentraciones temáticas de referencias cocitadas. Se aplican análisis de cocitación de revistas y de cocitación de autores. Con una consulta a la base bibliográfica Dimensions se extraen 8.145 documentos de todo tipo y 56.936 referencias citadas que integran el conjunto de datos inicial con el que se acomete el análisis. Se han generado redes Pathfinder usando CiteSpace para representar las revistas y los autores dominantes en la especialidad. La estructura temática de la especialidad se identifica mediante análisis de clusters de autores cocitados y análisis semánticos latentes. La investigación sobre “open knowledge”, “altmetric collection”, “web indicator”, “assessing research”, “researchgate score”, “open data citation advantage”, “google scholar autor citation”, “share data”, “academic tweet”, “mendeley readership count” y “social media metric”, aparecen como líneas de investigación actuales. Se aportan varios indicadores estadísticos para destacar las revistas y autores claves en la especialidad.
Referencias
Bailey, David S.; Zanders, Edward D. (2008). “Drug discovery in the era of Facebook-new tools for scientific networking”. Drug discovery today, v. 13, n. 19-20, pp. 863-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2008.07.003
Bar-Ilan, Judit (2018). “The journal of altmetrics is launched - Editorial”. Journal of altmetrics, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.5
Barnes, Cameron (2015). “The use of altmetrics as a tool for measuring research impact”. Australian academic & research libraries, v. 46, n. 2, pp. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2014.1003174
Becher, Tony (1989). Academic tribes and territories: intelectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press. ISBN: 0335092209
Bode, Christian; Herzog, Christian; Hook, Daniel; McGrath, Robert (2018). A guide to the Dimensions data approach. Cambridge: Digital Science. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5783094
Bornmann, Lutz; Haunschild, Robin (2016). “Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader- and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 3, pp. 776-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.015
Boyack, Kevin W.; Klavans, Richard (2010). “Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 12, pp. 2389-2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419
Bundy, Jacob J.; Hage, Anthony N.; Chick, Jeffrey-Forris B.; Srinivasa, Rajiv N.; Patel, Nischant; Johnson, Evan; Gemmete, Joseph J.; Srinivasa, Ravi N. (2018). “#Radiology: A 7-year analysis of radiology-associated hashtags”. Current problems in diagnostic radiology, v. 47, n. 5, pp. 296-301. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.04.005
Carpenter, Christopher R.; Cone, David C.; Sarli, Cathy C. (2014). “Using publications metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact”. Academic emergency medicine, v. 21, n. 10, pp. 1160-1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12482
Colbert, Gates B.; Topf, Joel; Jhaveri, Kenar D.; Oates, Tom; Rheault, Michelle N.; Shah, Silvi; Swapnil, Hiremath; Sparks, Matthew A. (2018). “The social media revolution in nephrology education”. Kidney international reports, v. 3, n. 3, pp. 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2018.02.003
Chang, Yu-Wei; Huang, Mu-Hsuan; Lin, Chiao-Wen (2015). “Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographic coupling, and co-citation analyses”. Scientometrics, v. 105, n. 3, pp. 2071-2087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8
Chen, Chaomei (2006). “CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 57, n. 3, pp. 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
Chen, Chaomei; Ibekwe-SanJuan, Fidelia; Hou, Jianhua (2010). “The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 7, pp. 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
Das, Anup-Kumar; Mishra, Sanjaya (2014). “Genesis of altmetrics or article-level metrics for measure efficacy of scholarly communications: Current perspectives”. Journal of scientometrics research, v. 3, n. 2, pp. 82-92. https://doi.org/10.4103/2320-0057.145622
Deerwester, Scott; Dumais, Susan T.; Furnas, George W.; Landauer, Thomas K.; Harshman, Richard (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 41, n. 6, pp. 91-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9
Egghe, Leo (2006). “Theory and practise of the g-index”. Scientometrics, n. 69, n. 1, pp. 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
Erdt, Mojisola; Nagarajan, Aarthy; Joanna-Sin, Sei-Ching; Theng, Yin-Leng (2016). “Altmetrics: An analisis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media”. Scientometrics, v. 109, n. 2, pp. 1117-1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2077-0
Fairclough, Ruth; Thelwall, Mike (2015). “National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers”. Journal of informetrics, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 845-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.003
Fanelli, Daniele; Glänzel, Wolfgang (2013). “Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences”. PLoS one, v. 8, n. 6, e66938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066938
Freeman, Linton C. (1977). “A set of measures on centrality based on betweenness”. Sociometry, v. 40, n. 1, pp. 35-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
García‐Peñalvo, Francisco J.; García-De-Figuerola, Carlos; Merlo, José A. (2010). “Open knowledge: Challenges and facts”. Online information review, v. 34, n. 4, pp. 520-539. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011072963
Gasparyan, Armen-Yuri; Yessirkepov, Marlen; Duisenova, Akmaral; Trukhachev, Vladimir I.; Kostyukova, Elena I; Kitas, George D. (2018). “Researcher and author impact metrics: variety, value, and context”. Journal of Korean medical science, v. 33, n. 18, e139. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e139
González-Valiente, Carlos-Luis; Pacheco-Mendoza, Josmel; Arencibia-Jorge, Ricardo (2016). “A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation”. Learned publishing, v. 29, n. 4, pp. 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1043
Hage, Anthony N.; Chick, Jeffrey-Forris B.; Jeffers, Brian; Srinivasa, Rajiv N.; Gemmete, Joseph J.; Srinivasa, Ravi N. (2018). “#interventionalradiology”. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology, v. 29, n. 5, pp. 699-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.12.023
Hoffmann, Robert (2008). “A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters”. Nature genetics, v. 40, pp. 1047-1051. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.f.217
Hou, Jianhua; Yang, Xiucai; Chen, Chaomei (2018). “Emerging trends and new developments in information science: A document co-citation analysis (2009-2016)”. Scientometrics, v. 115, n. 2, pp. 869-892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9
Hua, Fang; Shen, Cenyu; Walsh, Tania; Glenny, Anne-Marie; Worthington, Helen (2017). “Open access: Concepts, findings, and recommendations for stakeholders in dentistry”. Journal of dentistry, v. 64, pp. 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.012
Hull, Duncan; Pettifer, Steve R.; Kell, Douglas B. (2008). “Defrosting the digital library: Bibliographic tools for the next generation web”. PLoS computational biology, v. 4, n. 10, e1000204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000204
Kalia, Vivek; Ortiz, Daniel A.; Patel, Amy K.; Moriarity, Andrew K.; Canon, Cheri L.; Duszak J. R., Richard (2018). “Leveraging Twitter to maximize the radiology meeting experience”. Journal of the American College of Radiology, v. 15, n. 1, part B, pp.177-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.10.022
Kamada, Tomihisa; Kawai, Satoru (1989). “An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs”. Information processing letters, v. 31, n. 1, pp. 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(89)90102-6
Kaplan, Andreas M.; Haenlein, Michael (2010). “Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business horizons, v. 53, n. 1, pp. 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kleinberg, Jon (2002). “Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams”. En: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Sigkdd intl conf on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 91-101. New York: ACM Press. https://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/bhs.pdf
Koltay, Tibor; Špiranec, Sonja; Karvalics, László Z. (2015). “The shift of information literacy towards research 2.0”. The journal of academic librarianship, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.001
Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2015). “Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: Books and non-standard outputs”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 6, pp. 724-736. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.nov.04
Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2016). “Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 3, pp. 566-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23404
Leydesdorff, Loet (2008a). “Journals as retention mechanism of scientific growth”. Research trends, v. 31, n. 6.
Leydesdorff, Loet (2008b). “On the normalization and visualization of autor co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard Index”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 59, n. 1, pp. 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20732
Leydesdorff, Loet; Wagner, Caroline S.; Bornmann, Lutz (2018). “Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplnarity- a tribute to Eugene Garfield. Scientometrics, v. 114, n. 2, pp. 567-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2528-2
Liu, Guoying; Yang, Le (2019). “Popular research topics in the recent journal publications of library and information science”. Journal of academic librarianship, v. 45, n. 3, pp. 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.04.001
Logghe, Heather J.; Selby, Luke V.; Boeck, Marissa A.; Stamp, Nikki L.; Chuen, Jason; Jones, Christian (2018). “The academic tweet: Twitter as a tool to advance academic surgery”. Journal of surgical research, v. 226, pp. VIII-XII. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.049
Mane, Ketan K.; Börner, Katy (2004). “Mapping topics and topic burst in PNAS”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 101, suppl. 1, pp. 5287-5290. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307626100
Mas-Bleda, Amalia; Aguillo, Isidro F. (2015). La web social como nuevo medio de comunicación y evaluación científica. Barcelona: UOC. ISBN: 978 84 9064 922 0
McCain, Katherine W. (1991). “Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 42, n. 4, pp. 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<290::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-9
Morris, Steven A.; Van-der-Veer-Martens, Betsy (2008). “Mapping research specialties”. Annual review of information science and technology, v. 42, n. 1, pp. 213-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2008.1440420113
Newman, Mark E. J. (2006). “Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices”. Physical review E, v. 74, n. 3, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036104
NISO (2016). NISO-RP-25-2016. Outputs of the NISO alternative assessment metric project. National Information Standards Organization. https://www.niso.org/publications/rp-25-2016-altmetrics
Onyancha, Omwoyo-Bosire (2018). “Forty-five years of LIS research evolution, 1971-2015: An informetrics study of the autor-supplied keywords”. Publishing research quarterly, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9590-3
O’Reilly, Tim (2006). What is Web 2.0. https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2018). “Dimensions: Re-discovering the ecosystem of scientific information”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 2, pp. 420-431. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.21
Piwowar, Heather A.; Vision, Todd J. (2013). “Data reuse and the open data citation advantage”. Peerj, v. 1, e175. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175
Priem, Jason (2014). “Altmetrics”. En: Cronin, Blaise; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (eds.). Beyond bibliometrics. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 263-287. ISBN: 978 0 262 02679 6
Priem, Jason; Groth, Paul; Taraborelli, Dario (2012). “The altmetrics collection”. PLoS one, v. 7, n. 11, e48753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048753
Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul; Neylon, Cameron (2010). “Altmetrics: a manifesto”. Altmetrics, 26 October. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.; Ayoola, Abimbola; Duszak J. R., Richard (2017) “Alternative metrics (“altmetrics”) for assessing article impact in popular general radiology journals”. Academic radiology, v. 24, n. 7, pp. 891-897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.019
Rousseeuw, Peter J. (1987). “Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster análisis”. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, v. 20, pp. 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
Schvaneveldt, Roger W.; Durso, Francis T.; Dearholt, Donald W. (1989). “Network structures in proximity data”. Psychology of learning and motivation, v. 24, pp. 249-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60539-3
Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Work, Sam; Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie (2017). “Scholarly use on social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 9, pp. 2037-2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833
Thelwall, Mike (2012). “A history of webometrics”. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 38, n. 6, pp. 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2012.1720380606
Thelwall, Mike (2016). “The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.007
Thelwall, Mike (2017). Web indicators for research evaluation. A practical guide. Willinston: Morgan and Claypool. ISBN: 978 1 627059176 https://doi.org/10.2200/S00733ED1V01Y201609ICR052
Thelwall, Mike; Fairclough, Ruth (2015). “Geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles”. Journal of informetrics, v. 9, n. 2, pp. 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.004
Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2015a). “Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 5, pp. 587-606. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.08
Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2015b). “Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 5, pp. 607-620. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.09
Thelwall, Mike; Vaughan, Liwen; Björneborn, Lennart (2005). “Webometrics”. Annual review of information science and technology, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 81-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440390110
Todeschini, Roberto; Baccini, Alberto (2016). Handbook of bibliometric indicators: Quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. ISBN: 978 3 527 33704 0 https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527681969
Waltman, Ludo; Van-Eck, Nees-Jan (2012). “A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 12, pp. 2378-2392. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22748
Weller, Katrin (2015). “Social media and altmetrics: An overview of current alternative approaches to measuring scholarly impact”. En: Wellpe, Isabell M.; Wollersheim, Jutta; Ringelhan, Stefanie; Osterloh, Margit. Incentives and performance. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 261-275. ISBN: 978 3 319 09784 8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_16
White, Howard D.; Griffith Bellver C. (1981). “Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
Williams, Ann E. (2017). “Altmetrics: An overview and evaluation”. Online information review, v. 41, n. 3, pp. 311-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2016-0294
White, Howard, D. (2003). “Pathfinder networks and author cocitation análisis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 5, pp. 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10228
Whitley, Richard (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0 19 924045 0
Yan, Erjia; Ding, Ying (2012). “Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 7, pp. 1313-1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22680
Yang, Siluo; Han, Ruizhen; Wolfram, Dietmar; Zhao, Yuehua (2016). “Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006-2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 1, pp.132-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.003
Zhao, Dangzhi (2009). “Mapping library and information science: Does field delineation matter?”. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 46, n. 1, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460279
Zhou, Qingqing; Zhang, Chengzhi; Zhao, Star X.; Chen, Bikun (2016). “Measuring book impact based on the multi-granularity online review mining”. Scientometrics, v. 107, n. 3, pp. 1435-1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1930-5
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Condiciones de difusión de los artículos una vez son publicados
Los autores pueden publicitar sus artículos de acuerdo con estos términos:
Pasadas 2 semanas desde la publicación (tiempo necesario para que Google indexe la versión de la web de la revista), los autores pueden ofrecer en sus webs (personales o institucionales) o en cualquier repositorio de acceso abierto (OA) una copia del trabajo publicado por EPI. Deberán respetarse sin embargo, las siguientes condiciones:
- Solo deberá hacerse pública la versión editorial. Rogamos que no se publiquen preprints, postprints o pruebas de imprenta.
- Junto con esa copia ha de incluirse una mención específica de la publicación en la que ha aparecido el texto, añadiendo además un enlace clicable a la URL: http://www.profesionaldelainformacion.com
La revista Profesional de la información ofrece los artículos en acceso abierto con una licencia Creative Commons BY 
.
