Additive manufacturing technologies for biomedical engineering applications: Research trends and scientific impact

Autores/as

  • Enara Zarrabeitia-Bilbao Universidad del País Vasco
  • Izaskun Alvarez-Meaza Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
  • Rosa-María Río-Belver Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
  • Gaizka Garechana-Anacabe Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.20

Palabras clave:

Additive manufacturing, Biomedical engineering, Bibliometric analysis, Web indicators, Webometrics.

Resumen

Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies, technologies that produce three-dimensional parts layer by layer from a material, have the potential to revolutionize the paradigm of manufacturing. Furthermore, in recent years AM technologies have sparked intense interest for developing medical implants, devices, and scaffolds. In this context, the main objective of this article is to present an overall view of the trends and the impact of the research carried out in AM technologies for biomedical engineering applications. Therefore, to achieve the main objective, a research trend and scientific impact analysis model was designed and implemented, to carry out a bibliometric indicator analysis, in general, and a web indicator analysis, in particular. The findings obtained will advance the means of visualizing the state of research in AM for biomedical engineering technologies.

Citas

Aduku, Kuku-Joseph; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2017). “Do Mendeley reader counts reflect the scholarly impact of conference papers? An investigation of computer science and engineering”. Scientometrics, v. 112, n. 1, pp. 573-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2367-1

AM Platform (2014). Additive manufacturing: Strategic research agenda.

http://www.rm-platform.com/linkdoc/AM SRA - February 2014.pdf

Ardanuy, Jordi (2012). Breve introducción a la bibliometría. Universitat de Barcelona. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/30962/1/breve%20introduccion%20bibliometria.pdf

Bourell, David L.; Leu, Ming C.; Rosen, David W. (2009). Roadmap for additive manufacturing. Identifying the future of freeform processing. The University of Texas at Austin. https://wohlersassociates.com/roadmap2009A.pdf

Campbell, Thomas; Williams, Christopher; Ivanova, Olga; Garrett, Banning (2011). Could 3D printing change the World? Technologies, potential, and implications of additive manufacturing”. Atlantic Council. Strategic Foresight Report. http://globaltrends.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Could-3D-Printing-Change-the-World-Technologies-Potential-and-Implications-of-Additive-Manufacturing.pdf

Caviggioli, Federico; Ughetto, Elisa (2019). “A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society”. International journal of production economics, v. 208, pp. 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.022

Clarivate (2018). Web of Science. Clarivate. https://clarivate.com/products/web-of-science

Cruickshank, Michael (2017). “Additive manufacturing: Another layer to industry 4.0”. The manufacturer, 16 November.

https://www.themanufacturer.com/articles/additive-manufacturing-another-layer-to-industry-4-0

Diem, Andrea; Wolter, Stefan C. (2013). “The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences”. Research in higher education, v. 54, n. 1, pp. 86-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5

Ellegaard, Ole (2018). “The application of bibliometric analysis: Disciplinary and user aspects”. Scientometrics, v. 116, n. 1, pp. 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2765-z

Filser, Lukas-Daniel; Da-Silva, Fábio-Francisco; De-Oliveira, Otávio-José (2017). “State of research and future research tendencies in lean healthcare: A bibliometric analysis”. Scientometrics, v. 112, n. 2, pp. 799-816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2409-8

Gridlogics Technologies Pvt Ltd (2014). 3-D printing: Technology insight report. An analysis of patenting activity around 3D-Printing from 1990-Current. Patent Insight Pro. https://www.patentinsightpro.com/techreports/0214/Tech%20Insight%20Report%20-%203D%20Printing.pdf

Gunashekar, Salil; Lavoie, Rémi; Roberge, Guillaume; Rashid, Mohammed; Marjanovic, Sonja (2015). A bibliometric analysis of research by the Cambridge Neuroscience Strategic Research Initiative: Extended summary. Rand Europe; Science-Metrix. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1100/RR1189/RAND_RR1189.pdf

Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent; Thelwall, Mike; Amyot, Didier; Peters, Isabella (2014). “Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?”. Information technology, v. 56, n. 5, pp 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2014-1048

Holmberg, Kim (2015). Altmetrics for information professionals: Past, present and future. ISBN: 978 0 081002773

Jing, Su; Qinghua, Zhai; Landström, Hans (2017). “Entrepreneurship across regions: Internationalization and/or contextualization?”. In: Carmo-Farinha, Luis M.; Ferreira, João J. M.; Lawton, Helen; Bagchi-Sen, Sharmistha. Handbook of research on global competitive advantage through innovation and entrepreneurship, pp. 731-752. ISBN: 978 1 466683488 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8348-8.ch022

Koskinen, Johanna; Isohanni, Matti; Paajala, Henna; Jääskeläinen, Erika; Nieminen, Pentti; Koponen, Hannu; Tienari, Pekka; Miettunen, Jouko (2008). “How to use bibliometric methods in evaluation of scientific research? An example from Finnish schizophrenia research”. Nordic journal of psychiatry, v. 62, n. 2, pp. 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480801961667

Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2017a). “Are Wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 3, pp. 762-779. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23694

Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2017b). “Patent citation analysis with Google”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 1, pp. 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23608

López-Illescas, Carmen; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Moed, Henk F. (2009). “Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: The effect of poorly cited journals in oncology”. Journal of information science, v. 35, n. 2, pp. 244-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508098603

López-Muñoz, Francisco; Alamo, Cecilio; Rubio, Gabriel; García-García, Pilar; Martín-Agueda, Belén; Cuenca, Eduardo (2003). “Bibliometric analysis of biomedical publications on SSRI during 1980-2000”. Depression and anxiety, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10121

Marx, Werner; Bornmann, Lutz (2016). “Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references - A literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, v. 109, n. 2, pp. 1397-1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2111-2

Muhuri, Pranab K.; Shukla, Amit K.; Abraham, Ajith (2019). “Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview”. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, v. 78, pp. 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.11.007

OECD (2016). Enabling the next production revolution: the future of manufacturing and services. Interim report. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level. https://www.oecd.org/mcm/documents/Enabling-the-next-production-revolution-the-future-of-manufacturing-and-services-interim-report.pdf

Quarshie, Robert; MacLachlan, Stuart; Reeves, Phil; Whittaker, David; Blake, Robert (2012). Shaping our national competency in additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing. Special Interest Group. https://docplayer.net/7645943-Shaping-our-national-competency-in-additive-manufacturing.html

Rodríguez-Salvador, Marisela; Río-Belver, Rosa-María; Garechana-Anacabe, Gaizka (2017). “Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting”. PLoS one, v. 12, n. 6, e0180375. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180375

Singh, Sunpreet; Ramakrishna, Seeram (2017). “Biomedical applications of additive manufacturing: Present and future”. Current opinion in biomedical engineering, v. 2, pp. 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.006

Thelwall, Mike (2009a). Introduction to Webometric analyst 2.0: A research tool for social scientists. http://lexiurl.wlv.ac.uk/searcher/IntroductionToWebometricAnalyst2.doc

Thelwall, Mike (2009b). “Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences”. Information concepts, retrieval, and services, v. 1, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00176ED1V01Y200903ICR004

Thelwall, Mike (2016). “Web indicators for research evaluation: A practical guide”. Information concepts, retrieval, and services, v. 8, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00733ED1V01Y201609ICR052

Thelwall, Mike (2018). Statistical cybermetrics. Research Group. http://cybermetrics.wlv.ac.uk

Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2015a). “Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 5, p. 587. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.08

Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2015b). “Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 5, pp. 607-620. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.09

Thelwall, Mike; Sud, Pardeep (2018). “A comparison of title words for journals articles and Wikipedia pages: Coverage and stylistic differences?”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 1, pp. 49-64. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.ene.05

Tjahjono, Benny; Esplugues, C.; Ares, Enrique; Peláez, Gerardo C. (2017). “What does industry 4.0 mean to supply chain?”. Procedia manufacturing, v. 13, pp. 1175-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.191

Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2007). “VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects”. In: Decker, Reinhold; Lenz, Hans-Joachim (eds.). Advances in data analysis. Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 299-306. ISBN: 978 3 540 70980 0 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_34

Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2009). “How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 8, pp. 1635-1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075

Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2010). “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.” Scientometrics, v. 84, n. 2, pp. 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2011). “Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer”. ISSI newsletter, v. 7, n. 3, pp. 50-54. http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2058

VantagePoint (2018). The VantagePoint. https://www.thevantagepoint.com

VOSviewer (2018). “VOSviewer. Visualizing scientific landscapes. http://www.vosviewer.com

Waltman, Ludo; Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Noyons, Ed C. M. (2010). “A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks”. Journal of informetrics, v. 4, n. 4, pp. 629-635. http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1032

Zarrabeitia-Bilbao, Enara; Bildosola, Iñaki; Río-Belver, Rosa-María; Álvarez-Meaza, Izaskun; Cilleruelo-Carrasco, Ernesto (2019). “Laser additive manufacturing: A patent overview”. Engineering digital transformation, pp. 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96005-0_23

Descargas

Archivos adicionales

Publicado

2019-03-23

Cómo citar

Zarrabeitia-Bilbao, E., Alvarez-Meaza, I., Río-Belver, R.-M., & Garechana-Anacabe, G. (2019). Additive manufacturing technologies for biomedical engineering applications: Research trends and scientific impact. Profesional De La Información, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.20

Número

Sección

Artículos de investigación / Research articles

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.