Changing times for scholarly communication: The case of the academic research video and the online video journal


This paper aims to address the video as a new scholarly communication form, alternative to the traditional written paper. Although the use of video could be a worthwhile option for any field of study in which videographic practice would facilitate the communication of the research findings and thus enhance our understanding of them, this practice seems especially useful when the object of study itself is the audiovisual language. For this reason and because the number of media scholars communicating their research outputs in videos has increased in recent years to the extent of becoming a new trend, I focus on the exploration of this practice in this discipline. However, could the video meet academic standards, and thus be considered as a new scholarly form? If the answer is affirmative, what exactly makes a video academic? Offering some answers to these questions is the main purpose of this article, which reviews how the transition from the written paper to the audiovisual form is evolving. This exploration will include not only these types of videos but also the online journals that make the publication of such videos possible, thereby facilitating a study of how these online platforms allow new ways of communicating research outputs in academic contexts.

Biografía del autor/a

Fernando Canet, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Fernando Canet es Profesor Titular de Comunicación Audiovisual en la Facultad de Bellas Artes (Universidad Politécnica de Valencia). Doctor en Comunicación Audiovisual y Postgrado en Herramientas de Autor para Títulos Multimedia. Ha disfrutado de becas de estancias de investigación en Goldsmiths College University of London (UK) y en New York University (USA). Es autor de dos libros, co-autor de otro, Narrativa audiovisual: Estrategias y recursos (Síntesis, Madrid), co-editor de un cuarto, (Re)viewing Creative, Critical and Commercial Practices in Contemporary Spanish Cinema (Intellect Ltd. Bristol, UK, distribuido por University of Chicago Press) y co-editor de dos volúmenes sobre la obra polifacética de Javier Maqua (Shangrila Ediciones). Sus últimos artículos han sido publicados en Communication & Society, Studies in European Cinema, Studies in Documentary Films, Journal of Popular Culture y Popular Communication. Ha sido editor invitado en un número especial sobre el cine español contemporáneo para la revista Hispanic Research Journal, así como para la revista L´Atalante, con el título "Directores cinéfilos en tiempos modernos: cuando el cine se interroga a sí mismo", edición bilingüe (español e inglés). Ha sido Subdirector Docente de su departamento y Director del Área de Actividades Culturales de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.


Acord, Sophia K.; Harley, Diane (2013). “Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using web 2.0”. New media & society, v. 15, n. 3, pp. 379-397.

Alter, Nora M. (2003). “Memory essays”. In: Biemann, Ursula (ed.). Stuff it: The video essay in the digital age, pp. 12-23. Vienna: Springer. ISBN: 978 3 211203187

Álvarez-López, Cristina; Martin, Adrian (2014). “Introduction to the audiovisual essay: A child of two mothers”. Necsus, Autumn.

Álvarez-López, Cristina; Martin, Adrian (2015). “The audiovisual essay as art practice”. Necsus, June 11.

Arms, William Y.; Larsen, Ronald L. (2007). “The future of scholarly communication: Building the infrastructure for cyberscholarship”. In: Report of workshop. Phoenix, AZ: National Science Foundation and Joint Information Systems Committee, April 17–19.

Bazin, André [1958] (2003). “André Bazin on Chris Marker”. Film comment, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 44-45.

Becker, Christine (2017). “Introduction: Transforming scholarship through [in]transition”. Cinema journal, v. 56, n. 4, pp. 126-129.

Bellour, Raymond (2000). “The unattainable text”. In: Penley, Constance (ed.). The analysis of film. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN: 978 0 253213648

Calabrese, Andrew (1992). “Changing times for scholarly communication: The case of the electronic journal”. Technology in society, v. 14, n. 2, pp. 199-220.

Chion, Michel (1999). The voice in cinema. New York: Columbia UP. ISBN: 978 0 231108232

Codina, Lluís (2018). Revisiones bibliográficas sistematizadas: Procedimientos generales y framework para ciencias humanas y sociales. Barcelona: Master Universitario en Comunicación Social. Departamento de Comunicación. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

Denson, Shane (2017). “Open peer-review as multimodal scholarship”. Cinema journal, v. 56, n. 4, pp. 141-143.

Eriksson, Thommy; Sørensen, Inge E. (2012). “Reflection on academic video”. International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 1-15.

Faden, Eric S.; Lee, Kevin B. (2016). “In dialogue”. In: Keathley, Christian; Mittell, Jason (eds.). The videographic essay: Criticism in sound & image. Montreal: Caboose. ISBN: 978 1 927852040

Faden, Eric S. (2008). “A manifesto for critical media”. Mediascape: UCLA’s journal of cinema and media studies.

Grant, Catherine (2014). “How long is a piece of string? On the practice, scope and value of videographic film studies and criticism”. In: Audiovisual essay conference: Practice and theory of videographic film and moving image studies.

Grant, Catherine (2016). “Beyond tautology? Audio-visual film criticism”. Film criticism, v. 40, n. 1.

Grant, Catherine (2017). “Star studies in transition: Notes on experimental videographic approaches to film performance”. Cinema journal, v. 56, n. 4, pp. 148-158.

Grant, Maria J.; Booth, Andrew (2009). “A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies”. Health information and libraries journal, v. 26, n. 2, pp. 91-108.

Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia K.; Earl-Novell, Sarah; Lawrence, Shannon; King, C. Judson (2010). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.

Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia K. (2011). Peer review in academic promotion and publishing: its meaning, locus, and future. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Jankowski, Nicholas W.; Jones, Steve (2013). “Scholarly publishing and the internet: A NM&S themed section”. New media & society, v. 15, n. 3, pp. 345-358.

Keathley, Christian; Mittell, Jason (eds.) (2016). The videographic essay: Criticism in sound & image. Montreal: Caboose. ISBN: 978 1 927852040.

Keathley, Christian (2011). “La caméra-stylo: Notes on video criticism and cinephilia”. In: Clayton, Alex; Klevan, Andrew (eds.). The language and style of film criticism. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN: 978 0 415560962

Kiss, Miklos (2014). “The audiovisual research essay as an alternative to text-based scholarship”. [in]Transition.

Kolker, Robert (2004). “Digital media and the analysis of film”. In: Schreibman, Susan; Siemens, Ray; Unsworth, John (eds.). A companion to digital humanities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN: 978 1 405103213

Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike; Abdoli, Mahshid (2012). “The role of online videos in research communication: A content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 9, pp. 1710-1727.

Lavik, Erlend (2012). “The video essay: Th future of academic film and television criticism?”. Frames cinema journal.

Martin, Adrian (2010). “A voice too much”. De Filmkrant.

McWhirter, Andrew (2015). “Film criticism, film scholarship and the video essay”. Screen, v. 56, n. 3, pp. 369-377.

Mittell, Jason (2017). “Opening up [in]Transition’s open peer-review process”. Cinema journal, v. 56, n. 4, pp. 137-141.

Mittell, Jason (2016). “But Is any of this legal? Some notes about copyright and fair use”. In: Keathley, Christian; Mittell, Jason (eds.). The videographic essay: Criticism in sound & image. Montreal: Caboose. ISBN: 978 1 927852040

Morton, Drew (2017). “Beyond the essayistic: Defining the varied modal origins of videographic criticism”. Cinema journal, v. 56, n. 4, pp. 130-36.

Nentwich, Michael (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. ISBN: 978 3 7001 3188 5

Pasquali, Matias (2007). “Video in science. Protocol videos: The implications for research and society”. EMBO reports, v. 8, n. 8, pp. 712-716.

Pochoda, Phil (2013). “The big one: The epistemic system break in scholarly monograph publishing”. New media & society, v. 15, n. 3, pp. 359-378.

Stewart, James; Procter, Rob; Williams, Robin; Poschen, Meik (2013). “The role of academic publishers in shaping the development of web 2.0 services for scholarly communication”. New media & society, v. 15, n. 3, pp. 413-432.

Stork, Matthias (2004). “Film studies with high production values: An interview with Janet Bergstrom on making and teaching audiovisual essays”. Frames cinema journal.

Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Thelwall, Mike (2013). “Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination in TED videos”. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 4, pp. 663-674.

Van-den-Berg, Thomas; Kiss, Miklós (2016). Film studies in motion. From audiovisual essay to academic research video. Scalar.

Willinsky, John; Provençal, Johanne (2013). “The intellectual and institutional properties of learning: Historical reflections on patronage, autonomy, and transaction”. New media & society, v. 15, n. 3, pp. 398-412.

Cómo citar
Canet, F. (2019). Changing times for scholarly communication: The case of the academic research video and the online video journal. Profesional De La Información, 28(4).
Artículos de investigación / Research articles


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.