Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article



Palabras clave:

Scholarly reputation, Reputation building, Communication, Scholars, Careers, Profession, Professional activities, Literature review, Bibliography.


Seeking to understand how today's scholars may, indeed should go about building, maintaining and showcasing their professional reputation, the literature review presented here explores the reputational opportunities available to them in the increasingly open-values based, digital and networked environment of Science 2.0. Using a conceptual framework developed with the help of the European Commission and specifically designed for conducting analytical reviews and audits of the reputational value of scholarly activities, this study, examines in some detail the practices -more than 30 of them- that comprise the present-day scientific undertaking from a reputation-accruing angle.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.


Abramo, Giovanni; D´Angelo, Ciriaco-Andrea; Di-Costa, Flavia (2009). "Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation?". Higher education, v. 57, n. 2, pp. 155-171.

Abramo, Giovanni; D´Angelo, Ciriaco-Andrea; Di-Costa, Flavia (2010). "Testing the trade-off between productivity and quality in research activities". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 1, pp. 132-140.

Abramo, Giovanni; D´Angelo, Ciriaco-Andrea; Murgia, Gianluca (2014). "Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks". Scientometrics, v. 98, n. 3, pp. 2275-2294. (2018). About.

Adams, James D.; Black, Grant C.; Clemmons, J. Roger; Stephan, Paula E. (2005). "Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999". Research policy, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 259-285.

Agarwal, Ashok; Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi; Tatagari, Sindhuja; Esteves, Sandro D.; Harlev, Avi; Henkel, Ralf; Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep; Homa, Sheryl; Garrido-Puchalt, Nicolás; Ramasamy, Ranjith; Majzoub, Ahmad; Dao-Ly, Kim; Tvrda, Eva; Assidi, Mourad; Kesari, Kavindra; Sharma, Reecha; Banihani, Saleem; Ko, Edmund; Abu-Elmagd, Muhammad; Gosálvez, Jaime; Bashiri, Asher (2016). "Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics". Asian journal of andrology, v.18, n. 2, pp. 296-309.

í…kerlind, Gerlese S. (2008). "An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature". Studies in higher education, v. 33, n. 1, pp. 17-31.

Allen, Heidi G.; Stanton, Tasha R.; Di-Pietro, Flavia; Moseley, G. Lorimer (2013). "Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences". PloS one, v. 8, n. 7, e68914.

Alperin, Juan-Pablo; Fischman, Gustavo E.; McKiernan, Erin C.; Muñoz-Nieves, Carol; Niles, Meredith T.; Schimanski, Lesley (2018). "How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion, and tenure documents?". Humanities commons [preprint].

Altbach, Philip G.; Reisberg, Liz; Rumbley, Laura E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the Unesco 2009 World conference on higher education. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.,_Reisberg,_Rumbley_Tracking_an_Academic_Revolution,_UNESCO_2009.pdf

Andersen, Heine (2000). "Influence and reputation in the social sciences - how much do researchers agree?". Journal of documentation, v. 56, n. 6, pp. 674-692.

Anderson, Terry (2016). "Theories for learning with emerging technologies". In: Veletsianos, George (ed.). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, pp. 35-50. ISBN: 978 1 771991490

Anderson, Derrick M.; Slade, Catherine P. (2016). "Managing institutional research advancement: Implications from a university faculty time allocation study". Research in higher education, v. 57, n. 1, pp. 99-121.

Aung, Htet-Htet; Erdt, Mojisola; Theng, Yin-Leng (2017). "Awareness and usage of altmetrics: A user survey". Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 1, pp. 18-26.

Auranen, Otto; Nieminen, Mika (2010). "University research funding and publication performance "” An international comparison". Research policy, v. 39, n. 6, pp. 822-834.

Barbour, Kim; Marshall, David (2012). "The academic online: Constructing persona through the World Wide Web". First Monday, v. 17, n. 9.

Bauerlein, Mark; Gad-el-Hak, Mohamed; Grody, Wayne; McKelvey, Bill; Trimble, Stanley W. (2010). "We must stop the avalanche of low-quality research". The chronicle of higher education, June 13.

Bazeley, Pat (2010). "Conceptualising research performance". Studies in higher education, v. 35, n. 8, pp. 889-903.

Beaver, Donald (2004). "Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?". Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 3, pp. 399-408.

Beaver, Donald De B.; Rosen, Richard (1978). "Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship". Scientometrics, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 65-84.

Becher, Tony (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Stony Stratford: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. ISBN: 978 0 335092215

Becher, Tony; Trowler Paul (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Second ed. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. ISBN: 978 0 335206278

Benavent-Pérez, Marí­a; Gorraiz, Juan; Gumpenberger, Christian; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2012). "The different flavors of research collaboration: A case study of their influence on university excellence in four world regions". Scientometrics, v. 93, n. 1, pp. 41-58.

Bikard, Michaí«l; Murray, Fiona; Gans, Joshua S. (2015). "Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward". Management science, v. 61, n. 7, pp. 1473-1495.

Blackmore, Paul (2016a). Prestige in academic life: Excellence and exclusion. New York: Routledge. ISBN: 978 1 138884944

Blackmore, Paul (2016b). "Why research trumps teaching and what can be done about it". In: Blackmore, Paul; Blackwell, Richard; Edmondson, Martin (eds.). Tackling wicked issues: Prestige and employment outcomes in the teaching excellence framework. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.

Blackmore, Paul (2018). "What can policy-makers do with the idea of prestige, to make better policy?". Policy reviews in higher education, v. 2, n, 2, pp. 227-254.

Blackmore, Paul; Kandiko, Camille B. (2011). "Motivation in academic life: A prestige economy". Research in post-compulsory education, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 399-411.

Bloch, Carter; Graversen, Ebbe-Krogh; Pedersen, Heide-Skovgaard (2014). "Competitive research grants and their impact on career performance". Minerva, v. 52, n. 1, pp. 77-96.

Bonney, Rick; Ballard, Heidi; Jordan, Rebecca; McCallie, Ellen; Phillips, Tina; Shirk, Jennifer; Wilderman, Candie C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A Caise Inquiry Group Report.

Borchardt, Rachel; Moran, Cullen; Cantrill, Stuart; Chemjobber; Oh, See-Arr; Hartings, Matthew R. (2018). "Perception of the importance of chemistry research papers and comparison to citation rates". PloS one, v. 13, n. 3, e0194903.

Bordons, Marí­a; Gómez-Caridad, Isabel; Fernández-Bajón, Marí­a-Teresa; Zulueta, Marí­a-Ángeles; Méndez, Aida (1996). "Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research". Scientometrics, v. 37, n. 2, pp. 279-295.

Bornmann, Lutz (2011). "Scientific peer review". Annual review of information science and technology, v. 45, n. 1, pp. 197-245.

Bornmann, Lutz (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 895-903.

Bornmann, Lutz; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2008). "What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior". Journal of documentation, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 45-80.

Borrego, Ángel; Anglada, Lluí­s (2016). "Faculty information behaviour in the electronic environment: Attitudes towards searching, publishing and libraries". New library world, v. 117, n. 3/4, pp. 173-185.

Bourne, Philip E.; Barbour, Virginia (2011). "Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a scientific reputation". PLoS comput biol., v. 7, n. 6, e1002108.

Boyer, Ernest L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. A special report. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 0787940690

Boyer, Patricia; Cockriel, Irv (1998). "Factors influencing grant writing: Perceptions of tenured and nontenured faculty". SRA Journal, v. 29, n. 3-4, pp. 61-68.

Boyer, Patricia; Cockriel, Irv (2001). "Grant performance of junior faculty across disciplines: Motivators and barriers". Journal of research administration, v. 2, n. 1, pp. 19-23.

Braxton, John M.; Luckey, William; Helland, Patricia (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer´s four domains. Ashe-Eric higher education report. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 0787958417

Breschi, Stefano; Cusmano, Lucia (2004). "Unveiling the texture of a European research area: Emergence of oligarchic networks under EU framework programmes". International journal of technology management, v. 27, n. 28, pp. 747-772.

Brew, Angela (2001). "Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study". Studies in higher education, v. 26, n. 3, pp. 271-285.

Brew, Angela (2012). "Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education". Higher education research & development, v. 31, n. 1, pp. 101-114.

Brewer, Dominic J.; Gates, Susan M.; Goldman, Charles A. (2001). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Bukvova, Helena (2010). "Studying research collaboration: A literature review". Working papers on information systems, v. 10, n. 3. Sprouts.

Carayol, Nicolas; Thi, Thuc-Uyen-Nguyen (2005). "Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?". Research evaluation, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 70-79.

Casadevall, Arturo; Fang, Ferric C. (2012). "Reforming science: Methodological and cultural reforms". Infection and immunity, v. 80, n. 3, pp. 891-896.

Chikoore, Lesley; Probets, Steve; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire (2016). "How are UK academics engaging the public with their research? A cross-disciplinary perspective". Higher education quarterly, v. 70, n. 2, pp. 145-169.

Ciber Research (2018). Harbingers: Third year interim results.

Clark, Burton (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford, MA: Pergamon Press. ISBN: 978 0 080433547

Colquhoun, David (2011). "Publish or perish: Peer review and the corruption of science". The guardian, 5 September.

Conole, Gráinne; Scanlon, Eileen; Mundin, Paul; Farrow, Robert (2010). Interdisciplinary research - Findings from the technology enhanced learning research programme. TLRP, UK.

Copiello, Sergio; Bonifaci, Pietro (2018). "A few remarks on ResearchGate score and academic reputation". Scientometrics, v. 114, n. 1, pp. 301-306.

Corley, Elizabeth A.; Boardman, P. Craig; Bozeman, Barry (2006). "Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies". Research policy, v. 35, n. 7, pp. 975-993.

Couros, Alec; Hildebrandt, Katia (2016). "Designing for open and social learning". In: Veletsianos, George (ed.). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, pp. 143-161. ISBN: 978 1 771991490

Cronin, Blaise (2013). "Metrics à la mode". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 6, pp. 1091.

Cronin, Blaise; Shaw, Debora; La-Barre, Kathryn (2003). "A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 9, pp. 855-871.

Cronin, Catherine (2017). "Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education". The international review of research in open and distributed learning, v. 18, n. 5.

Cronin, Catherine; MacLaren, Iain (2018). "Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices". Open praxis, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 127-143. Open Education Global Conference Selected Papers.

Crow, Robert; Cruz, Laura; Ellern, Jill; Ford, George; Moss, Hollye; White, Barbara-Jo (2018). "Boyer in the middle: Second generation challenges to emerging scholarship". Innovative higher education, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 107-123.

Daniel, John (2012). "Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility". Journal of interactive media in education, v. 2012, n. 3, art. 18.

David, Paul A.; Den-Besten, Matthijs; Schroeder, Ralph (2010). "Will e-science be open science?". In: Dutton, William; Jeffreys, Paul (eds.). World wide research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities in the century of information. Siepr Discussion paper N. 08-10. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.

Delanty, Gerard (1998). "The idea of the university in the global era: from knowledge as an end to the end of knowledge?". Social epistemology, v. 12, n. 1, pp. 3-25.

De-Rond, Mark; Miller, Alan N. (2005). "Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life?". Journal of management inquiry, v. 14, n. 4, pp. 321-329.

Defazio, Daniela; Lockett, Andy; Wright, Mike (2009). "Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program". Research policy, v, 38, n. 2, pp. 293-305.

Dermentzi, Eleni; Papagiannidis, Savvas; Osorio-Toro, Carlos; Yannopoulou, Natalia (2016). "Academic engagement: Differences between intention to adopt social networking sites and other online technologies". Computers in human behavior, v. 61, pp. 321-332.

Desrochers, Nadine; Paul-Hus, Adèle; Haustein, Stefanie; Costas, Rodrigo; Mongeon, Philippe; Quan-Haase, Anabel; Bowman, Timothy D.; Pecoskie, Jen; Tsou, Andrew; Larivière, Vincent (2018). "Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science". Social science information, v. 57, n. 2, pp. 223-248. 10.1177/0539018417752089

Dewett, Todd; Denisi, Angelo S. (2004). "Exploring scholarly reputation: It´s more than just productivity". Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 2, pp. 249-272.

Donelan, Helen (2016). "Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia". Journal of further and higher education, v. 40, n. 5, pp. 706-729.

Duffy, Brooke-Erin; Pooley, Jefferson D. (2017). ""˜Facebook for academics´: The convergence of self-branding and social media logic on". Social media + society, v. 3, n. 1.

Dunwoody, Sharon; Ryan, Michael (1985). "Scientific barriers to the popularization of science in the mass media". Journal of communication, v. 35, n. 1, pp. 26-42.

Ecklund, Elaine H.; James, Sarah A.; Lincoln, Anne E. (2012). How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach. PloS one, v. 7, n. 5, e36240.

Egghe, Leo; Bornmann, Lutz (2013). "Fallout and miss in journal peer review". Journal of documentation, v. 69, n. 3, pp. 411-416.

Erdt, Mojisola; Nagarajan, Aarthy; Sin, Sei-Ching-Joanna; Theng, Yin-Leng (2016). "Altmetrics: An analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media". Scientometrics, v. 109, n. 2, pp. 1117-1166.

Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). "The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations". Research policy, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 109-123.

European Commission (2013). Opening up education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new technologies and open educational resources. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

European Commission (2014). Public consultation "˜science 2.0´: Science in transition. Directorates-General for Research and Innovation (RTD) and Communications Networks, Content and Technology (Connect). Background document.

European Parliament (2012). Modernising Europe´s higher education systems. European Parliament resolution of 20 April 2012 on modernising Europe´s higher education systems (2011/2294(INI).

Fanelli, Daniele; Larivière, Vincent (2016). "Researchers´ individual publication rate has not increased in a century". PloS one, v. 11, n. 3, e0149504.

Franck, Georg (1999). "Scientific communication. A vanity fair?". Science, v. 286, n. 5437, pp. 53-55.

Freeman, Richard B.; Ganguli, Ina; Murciano-Goroff, Raviv (2014). Why and wherefore of increased scientific collaboration (Working paper no. w19819). National Bureau of Economic Research.

French, Amanda (2017). "Contextualising excellence in higher education teaching: Understanding the policy landscape". In: French, Amanda; O´Leary, Matt (eds.). Teaching excellence in higher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp. 5-38. ISBN: 978 1 78714 762 1

Frost, Jetta; Brockmann, Julia (2014). "When qualitative productivity is equated with quantitative productivity: Scholars caught in a performance paradox". Zeitschrift fí¼r Erziehungswissenschaft, v. 17, n. 6, pp. 25-45.

Fyfe, Aileen; Coate, Kelly; Curry, Stephen; Lawson, Stuart; Moxham, Noah; Rostvik, Camila (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. A briefing paper.

Garnett, Fred; Ecclesfield, Nigel (2012). Towards a framework for co-creating open scholarship. Research in learning technology, v. 19.

Garvey, William D. (1975). "The dynamic scientific-information user". In: Debons, Anthony; Cameron, William J. (eds). Perspectives in information science. NATO Advances study institutes series (Series E: Applied science), v. 10. Dordrecht: Springer.

Garvey, William D.; Griffith, Belver (1972). "Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology". Information storage and retrieval, v. 8, n. 3, pp. 123-136.

Gibbons, Michael; Limoges, Camille; Nowotny, Helga; Schwartzman, Simon; Scott, Peter; Trow, Martin (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage. ISBN: 0 8039 7794 8

Glí¤nzel, Wolfgang; De-Lange, Cornelius (2002). "A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration". Scientometrics, v. 54, n. 1, pp. 75-89.

Greenhow, Christine; Gleason, Benjamin (2014). "Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media". British journal of educational technology, v. 45, n. 3, pp. 392-402.

Greenhow, Christine; Gleason, Benjamin (2015). "The social scholar: Re-interpreting scholarship in the shifting university". On the horizon, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 277-284.

Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Kyvik, Svein (2010). "Are the concepts basic research, applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics". Science and public policy, v. 37, n. 5, pp. 343-353.

Hagstrom, Warren O. (1964). "Anomy in scientific communities". Social problems, v. 12, n. 2, pp. 186-195.

Hagstrom, Warren O. (1974). "Competition in science". American sociological review, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 1-18

Halevi, Gali; Schimming, Laura (2018). "An initiative to track sentiments in altmetrics". Journal of altmetrics, v. 1, n. 1, p. 2.

Hammarfelt, Bjí¶rn; De-Rijcke, Sarah; Rushforth, Alexander D. (2016). "Quantified academic selves: The gamification of science through social networking services". Information research, v. 21, n. 2, paper SM1.

Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia-Krzys; Earl-Novell, Sarah; Lawrence, Shannon; King, C. Judson (2010). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. Berkeley: University of California Center for Studies in Higher Education. ISBN: 978 0 615 35834 5

Haustein, Stefanie (2016). "Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies". Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 1, pp. 413-423.

Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent (2015). "The use of bibliometrics for assessing research: Possibilities, limitations and adverse effects". In: Welpe, Isabell M.; Wollersheim, Juta; Ringelhan, Stefanie; Osterloh, Margit (eds). Incentives and performance. Cham: Springer, pp. 121-139. ISBN: 978 3 319 09785 5

Haustein, Stefanie; Peters, Isabella; Bar-Ilan, Judit; Priem, Jason; Shema, Hadas; Terliesner, Jens (2014). "Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community". Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1145-1163.

Heap, Tania; Minocha, Shailey (2012). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging for digital scholarship. Research in learning technology, v. 20 (Supp.), pp. 176-188.

Herman, Eti (2018). "Scholarly reputation". FEMS microbiology letters, v. 365, n. 18, fny200.

Hoekman, Jarno; Scherngell, Thomas; Frenken, Koen; Tijssen, Robert (2012). "Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration". Journal of economic geography, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 23-52.

Hsieh, David (2013). Organization and role of international collaboration in research production. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Arizona.,+David.pdf

Irwin, Alan (2008). "Risk, science and public communication: Third-order thinking about scientific culture". In: Bucchi, Massimiano; Trench, Brian (eds.). Handbook of public communication of science and technology. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 199-212. ISBN: 978 1 135049478

Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti (2016). "Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms". Research evaluation, v. 25, n. 1, pp. 37-49.

Jensen, Pablo; Rouquier, Jean-Baptiste; Kreimer, Pablo; Croissant, Yves (2008). "Scientists who engage with society perform better academically". Science and public policy, v. 35, n. 7, pp. 527-541.

Jordan, Katy (2017). Understanding the structure and role of academics´ ego-networks on social networking sites. PhD thesis. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

Katz, J. Sylvan; Martin, Ben R. (1997). "What is research collaboration?". Research policy, v. 26, n. 1, pp. 1-18.

Kekí¤le, Jouni (2003). "Academic leaders as thermostats". Tertiary education & management, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 281-298.

Kjellberg, Sara; Haider, Juta (2018). "Researchers´ online visibility: Tensions of visibility, trust and reputation". Online information review.

Kling, Rob; McKim, Geoffrey (1999). "Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing". Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 50, n. 10, pp. 890-906.<890::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-8

Kogan, Maurice (2007). "The academic profession and its interface with management". In: Kogan, Maurice; Teichler, Ulrich (eds.). Key challenges to the academic profession. Paris and Kassel: Unesco Forum on Higher Education Research and Knowledge.

Koryakina, Tatyana; Sarrico, Cláudia S.; Teixeira, Pedro N. (2015). "Universities´ third mission activities". In: The transformation of university institutional and organizational boundaries. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, pp. 63-82. ISBN: 978 94 6300 178 6

Koseoglu, Suzan; Bozkurt, Aras (2018). "An exploratory literature review on open educational practices". Distance education, pp. 1-21.

Landry, Réjean; Traore, Namatie; Godin, Benoí®t (1996). "An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity". Higher education, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 283-301.

Larivière, Vincent; Gingras, Yves (2010). "On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 1, pp. 126-131.

Larivière, Vincent; Gingras, Yves; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Tsou, Andrew (2015). "Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 7, pp. 323-1332.

Lasthiotakis, Helen; Kretz, Andrew; Sá, Creso (2015). "Open science strategies in research policies: A comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK". Policy futures in education, v. 13, n. 8, pp. 968-989.

Latour, Bruno; Woolgar, Steve (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978 0 691028323

Laudel, Grit (2005). "Is external research funding a valid indicator for research performance?". Research evaluation, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 27-34.

Leahey, Erin (2016). "From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration". Annual review of sociology, v. 42, pp. 81-100.

Leahey, Erin; Beckman, Christine; Stanko, Taryn (2012). The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists´ careers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Denver, CO.

Lee, Sooho; Bozeman, Barry (2005). "The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity". Social studies of science, v. 35, n.5, pp. 673-702.

Lee, Carole J.; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Zhang, Guo; Cronin, Blaise (2013). "Bias in peer review". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 2-17.

Leydesdorff, Loet; Etzkowitz, Henry (1996). "Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations". Science and public policy, v. 23, n. 5, pp. 279-286.

Liang, Xuan; Su, Leona-Yi-Fan; Yeo, Sara K.; Scheufele, Dietram A.; Brossard, Dominique; Xenos, Michael; Nealey, Paul; Corley, Elizabeth A. (2014). "Building buzz: (Scientists) communicating science in new media environments". Journalism & mass communication quarterly, v. 91, n. 4, pp. 772-791.

Lindgren, Lena (2011). "If Robert Merton said it, it must be true: A citation analysis in the field of performance measurement". Evaluation, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 7-19.

Lupton, Deborah (2014). "˜Feeling better connected´: Academics´ use of social media. Report. Canberra: News and Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.

Mabe, Michael; Mulligan, Adrian (2011). "What journal authors want: Ten years of results from Elsevier´s author feedback programme". New review of information networking, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 71-89.

Mairesse, Jacques; Turner, Laure (2005). Measurement and explanation of the intensity of co-publication in scientific research: An analysis at the laboratory level (NBER Working paper n. 11172). Revised in 2010. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Mallard, Grégoire; Lamont, Michèle; Guetzkow, Joshua (2009). "Fairness as appropriateness. Negotiating epistemological differences in peer review". Science, technology & human values, v. 34, n. 5, pp. 573-606.

Martí­n-Sempere, Marí­a-José; Rey-Rocha, Jesús; Garzón-Garcí­a, Belén (2002). "The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists. Case study of Spanish university researchers in Geology". Scientometrics, v. 55, n. 3, pp. 377-394.

Mas-Bleda, Amalia; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan; Aguillo, Isidro F. (2014). "Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?". Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 1, pp. 337-356.

McKiernan, Erin C.; Bourne, Philip E.; Brown, C. Titus; Buck, Stuart; Kenall, Amye; Lin, Jennifer; McDougall, Damon; Nosek, Brian A.; Ram, Karthik; Soderberg, Courtney K.; Spies, Jeffrey R.; Thaney, Kaitlin; Updegrove, Andrew; Woo, Kara H.; Yarkoni, Tal (2016). "How open science helps researchers succeed". Elife, n. 5, e16800.

Meadows, Arthur-Jack (1998). Communicating research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ISBN: 978 0 124874152

Meishar-Tal, Hagit; Pieterse, Efrat (2017). "Why do academics use academic social networking sites?". The international review of research in open and distributed learning, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 1-22.

Melguizo, Tatiana; Strober, Myra H. (2007). "Faculty salaries and the maximization of prestige". Research in higher education, v. 48, n. 6, pp. 633-668.

Menéndez, Maria; De-Angeli, Antonella; Menestrina, Zeno (2012). "Exploring the virtual space of academia". In: Dugdale, Julia; Masclet, Cédric; Grasso, Maria-Antonietta; Boujut, Jean-Franí§ois;, Hassanaly, Parina (eds.). From research to practice in the design of cooperative systems: Results and open challenges, 49-63. London, UK: Springer. ISBN: 978 1 4471 4093 1

Merton, Robert K. (1963). "Resistance to the systematic study of multiple discoveries in science". European journal of sociology, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 237-282.

Merton, Robert K. (1968). "The Matthew effect in science". Science, v. 159, n. 3810, pp. 56-63.

Merton, Robert K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: The University of Chicago. ISBN: 978 0 226520926

Miller, Alan N.; Taylor, Shannon G.; Bedeian, Arthur G. (2011). "Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it". Career development international, v. 16, n. 5, pp. 422-445.

Moe, Rolin (2016). "The phenomenal MOOC". In: Veletsianos, George (ed.). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, pp. 163-178. ISBN: 978 1 771991490

Moed, Henk F.; Halevi, Gali (2015). "Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 10, pp. 1988-2002.

Moodie, Graeme C.; Eustace, Rowland (1974). Power and authority in British universities. London: George Allen & Unwin. ISBN: 978 1 138006409

Moore, Samuel; Neylon, Cameron; Eve, Martin-Paul; O´Donnell, Daniel-Paul; Pattinson, Damian (2017). ""˜Excellence R Us´: University research and the fetishisation of excellence". Palgrave communications, n. 3, 16105.

Mulligan, Adrian; Hall, Louise; Raphael, Ellen (2013). "Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 132-161.

Murray, Fiona (2010). "The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions". American journal of sociology, v. 116, n. 2, pp. 341-388.

Muscanell, Nicole; Utz, Sonja (2017). "Social networking for scientists: An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate". Online information review, v. 41, n. 5, pp. 744-759.

Nature Publishing Group (2015). Author insights 2015 survey.

Nedeva, Maria; Boden, Rebecca; Nugroho, Yanuar (2012). "Rank and file: Managing individual performance in university research". Higher education policy, v. 25, n. 3, pp. 335-360.

Nentwich, Michael; Kí¶nig, René (2014). "Academia goes Facebook? The potential of social network sites in the scholarly realm". In: Bartling, Sí¶nke; Friesike, Sascha (eds.). Opening science: The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Cham: Springer. ISBN: 978 3 319 00026 8

Ness, Roberta B. (2014). The creativity crisis: Reinventing science to unleash possibility. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 199375387

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Clark, David (2016). "Scholarly reputation building: How does ResearchGate fare". International journal of knowledge content development and technology, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 67-92.

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R. (2015a). Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars: A literature-based theoretical framework of scholarly activities and a state-of-the-art appraisal of the social networking services used by scholars, to build, maintain and showcase their reputation. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. ISBN: 978 92 79 47225 1

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R. (2015b). "Analysis of emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars". In: Vuorikari, Riina; Punie, Yves (Eds). Analysis of emerging reputation and funding mechanisms in the context of open Science 2.0. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, pp. 3-72.

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Rodrí­guez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Dobrowolski, Tom; Pouchot, Stephanie (2015a). "New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation". Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 3, pp. 169-183.

Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Watkinson, Anthony; Herman, Eti; Tenopir, Carol; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth (2015b). "Do younger researchers assess trustworthiness differently when deciding what to read and cite and where to publish?". International journal of knowledge content development and technology, v. 5, n. 2.

Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Tenopir, Carol; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth (2015c). "Peer review: Still king in the digital age". Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 1, pp. 15-21.

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Abrizah, Abdullah; Watkinson, Anthony; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena; Rodrí­guez-Bravo, Blanca (2018). "Early career researchers´ quest for reputation in the digital age". Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 4, pp. 375-396.

Nicholas, David; Rodrí­guez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena (2017). "Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices". Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 205-217.

Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth; Tenopir, Carol; Herman, Eti (2014). "Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: Setting the scene for a major study". Learned publishing, v. 27, n. 2, pp. 121-134.

Ortega, José-Luis (2015). "Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC´s members". Journal of informetrics, v. 9, n. 1, pp. 39-49.

Parra, Cristhian; Casati, Fabio; Daniel, Florian; Marchese, Maurizio; Cernuzzi, Luca; Dumas, Marlon; Kungas, Peep; Garcí­a-Bañuelos, Luciano; Kisselite, Karina (2011). "Investigating the nature of scientific reputation". In: 13th Intl Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conf., Durban, South Africa.

Pearce, Nick; Weller, Martin; Scanlon, Eileen; Ashleigh, Melanie (2010). "Digital scholarship considered: How new technologies could transform academic work". In education, v. 16, n. 1.

Penfield, Teresa; Baker, Matthew J.; Scoble, Rosa; Wykes, Michael C. (2014). "Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review". Research evaluation, v. 23, n. 1, pp. 21-32.

Piwowar, Heather A.; Vision, Todd J. (2013). "Data reuse and the open data citation advantage". PeerJ, 1, e175.

Ponte, Diego; Simon, Judith (2011). "Scholarly communication 2.0: Exploring researchers´ opinions on Web 2.0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and dissemination". Serials review, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 149-156.

Price, Derek-John-De-Solla; Beaver, Donald (1966). "Collaboration in an invisible college". American psychologist, v. 21, n. 11, pp. 1011-1018.

Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul; Neylon, Cameron (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto.

Priem, Jason (2014). "Altmetrics". In: Cronin, Blaise; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (eds.). Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. ISBN: 978 0 262525510

Publishing Research Consortium (2016). Publishing research consortium peer review survey 2015. London: Mark Ware Consulting.

Rafols, Ismael; Leydesdorff, Loet; O´Hare, Alice; Nightingale, Paul; Stirling, Andy (2012). "How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management". Research policy, v. 41, n. 7, pp. 1262-1282.

Rainie, Lee; Funk, Cary; Anderson, Monica (2015). How scientists engage the public. Pew Research Center.

Reif, Fred (1961). "The competitive world of the pure scientist". Science, v. 134, n. 3494, pp. 1957-1962.

ResearchGate (2018). About.

Research Information network (2010). Peer review: A guide for researchers. Research Information Network.

Rhoten, Diana; Parker, Andrew (2004). "Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path". Science, v. 306, n. 5704, pp. 2046.

Rhoades, Gary (1998). Managed professionals. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978 0 7914 3716 2

Rinne, Risto; Koivula, Jenni (2009). "The dilemmas of the changing university". In: Shattock, Michael (ed.). Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy. Diversification and organisational change in European higher education. London: Open University Press & Paris: IIEP, Unesco, pp. 183-199.

Robson, Sue (2017). "Developing and supporting teaching excellence in higher education". In: French, Amanda; O´Leary, Mat (eds.). Teaching excellence in higher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp. 109-136. ISBN: 978 1 78714 762 1

Rodrí­guez-Bravo, Blanca; Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Watkinson, Anthony; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; ÅšwigoÅ„, Marzena (2017). "Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers". Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 4, pp. 269-277.

Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Deppe, Arvid; Schmidt, Birgit (2017). "Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers". PloS one, v. 12, n. 12, e0189311.

Rotman, Dana; Preece, Jennifer; Hammock, Jennifer; Procita, Kezee; Hansen, Derek; Parr, Cynthia; Lewis, Darcy; Jacobs, David (2012). "Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects". In: Procs of the ACM 2012 conf on computer supported cooperative work, pp. 217-226.

Rowlands, Ian; Nicholas, David; Russell, Bill; Canty, Nicholas; Watkinson, Anthony (2011). "Social media use in the research workflow". Learned publishing, v. 24, n. 3, pp. 183-195.

Scanlon, Eileen (2014). "Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement". British journal of educational technology, v. 45, n. 1, pp. 12-23.

Sense about science (2009). Peer review survey 2009.

Shatz, David (2004). Peer review: A critical inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN: 978 0 742514355

Shirk, Jennifer L.; Ballard, Heidi L.; Wilderman, Candie C.; Phillips, Tina; Wiggins, Andrea; Jordan, Rebecca; McCallie, Ellen; Minarchek, Matthew; Lewenstein, Bruce V.; Krasny, Marianne E.; Bonney, Rick (2012). "Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design". Ecology and society, v. 17, n. 2.

Shneiderman, Ben (2008). "Science 2.0". Science, v. 319, n. 5868, pp. 1349-1350.

Siler, Kyle; Lee, Kirby; Bero, Lisa (2015). "Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 112, n. 2, pp. 360-365.

Singh, Jasjit; Fleming, Lee (2010). "Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality?". Management science, v. 56, n. 1, pp. 41-56.

Slaughter, Sheila; Leslie, Larry L. (2001). "Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism". Organization, v. 8, n. 2, pp. 154-161.

Sonnenwald, Diane H. (2007). "Scientific collaboration". Annual review of information science and technology, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 643-681.

Souder, Lawrence (2011). "The ethics of scholarly peer review: A review of the literature". Learned publishing, v. 24, n. 1, pp. 55-74.

Storer, Norman W. (1963). "Institutional norms and personal motives in science". In: The annual meetings of the Eastern Sociological Society, April 6, New York.

Storer, Norman W. (1966). The social system of science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978 0 030568657

Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Work, Sam; Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie (2017). "Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 9, pp. 2037-2062.

Tahamtan, Iman; Afshar, Askar-Safipour; Ahamdzadeh, Khadijeh (2016). "Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature". Scientometrics, v. 107, n. 3, pp. 1195-225.

Taylor & Francis (2016). Peer review in 2015: A global view.

Tennant, Jonathan; Dugan, Jonathan M.; Graziotin, Daniel; Jacques, Damien C.; Waldner, Franí§ois; Mietchen, Daniel; Elkhatib, Yehia; Collister, Lauren B.; Pikas, Christina K.; Crick, Tom; Masuzzo, Paola; Caravaggi, Anthony; Berg, Devin R.; Niemeyer, Kyle E.; Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Mannheimer, Sara; Rigling, Lilian; Katz, Daniel S.; Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian; Pacheco-Mendoza, Josmel; Fatima, Nazeefa; Poblet, Marta; Isaakidis, Marios; Irawan, Dasapta-Erwin; Renaut, Sébastien; Madan, Christopher R.; Matthias, Lisa; Kjaer, Jesper-Norgaard; O´Donnell, Daniel-Paul; Neylon, Cameron; Kearns, Sarah; Selvaraju, Manojkumar; Colomb, Julien (2017). "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review". F1000 Research, n. 6, 1151.

Tennant, Jonathan P. (2018). "The state of the art in peer review". FEMS Microbiology letters, v. 365, n. 19, fny204.

Tenopir, Carol (2016). "Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis". Information processing & management, v. 52, n. 3, pp. 446-458.

Tenopir, Carol; Levine, Kenneth; Allard, Suzie; Christian, Lisa; Volentine, Rachel; Boehm, Reid; Nichols, Frances; Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Watkinson, Anthony (2015). "Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 10, pp. 2344-2361.

Truex, Duane; Cuellar, Michael; Vidgen, Richard; Takeda, Hirotoshi (2011). "Emancipating scholars: Reconceptualizing scholarly output". In: 7th Intl critical management studies conf (Cms7 2001). Naples, Italy, July 11-13. Naples: CMS7.

Van-Arensbergen, Pleun; Van-der-Weijden, Inge; Van-den-Besselaar, Peter (2014). "The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels". Research evaluation, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 298-311.

Van-Dalen, Hendrik P.; Henkens, Kène (2001). "What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers". Scientometrics, v. 50, n. 3, pp. 455-482.

Van-Dalen, Hendrik P.; Henkens, Kène (2012). "Intended and unintended consequences of a publis-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, m. 7, pp. 1282-1293.

Van-Noorden, Richard (2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature, v. 512, n. 7513, pp. 126-129.

Van-Noorden, Richard (2015). "Interdisciplinary research by the numbers". Nature news, v. 525, n. 7569, pp. 306-307.

Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (1998). "The influence of international collaboration of the impact of the research results". Scientometrics, v. 42, n. 3, pp. 423-428.

Van-Rijnsoever, Frank J.; Hessels, Laurens K. (2011). "Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration". Research policy, v. 40, n. 3, pp. 463-472.

Vannini, Phillip (2006). "Dead poets´ society: Teaching, publish-or-perish, and professors´ experiences of authenticity". Symbolic interaction, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 235-57.

Veletsianos, George (2016). "The defining characteristics of emerging technologies and emerging practices in digital education". In:

Veletsianos, George (ed.). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, pp. 3-16. ISBN: 978 1 771991490

Veletsianos, George; Kimmons, Royce (2012). "Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship". The international review of research in open and distance learning, v. 13, n. 4, pp. 166-189.

Vicente-Sáez, Rubén; Martí­nez-Fuentes, Clara (2018). "Open science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition". Journal of business research, v. 88, pp. 428-436.

Voas, Jeffrey; Hurlburt, George F.; Miller, Keith W.; Laplante, Phillip A.; Michael, Bret (2011). "Thoughts on higher education and scientific research". IT professional, v. 13, n. 2, pp. 6-9.

Waaijer, Cathelijn J.; Teelken, Christine; Wouters, Paul F.; Van-der-Weijden, Inge C. (2018). "Competition in science: Links between publication pressure, grant pressure and the academic job market". Higher education policy, v. 31, n. 2, pp. 225-243.

Waltman, Lutz (2016). "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators". Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 365-91.

Wang, Jian; Thijs, Bart; Glí¤nzel, Wolfang (2015). "Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity". PloS one, v. 10, n. 5, e0127298.

Ware, Mark; Monkman, Mike (2008). Peer review in scholarly journals. An international study into the perspective of the scholarly community. Mark Ware Consulting.

Watkinson, Anthony; Nicholas, David; Thornley, Clare; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth; Tenopir, Carol (2016). "Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis". Information processing & management, v. 52, n. 3, pp. 446-458.

Weller, Ann (2001). Editorial peer review: It´s strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today. ISBN: 978 1 573871006

Weller, Martin (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming academic practice. Basingstoke: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN: 978 1 84966 617 6


Weller, Saranne (2016). Academic practice: Developing as a professional in higher education. London, UK: Sage. ISBN: 978 1 446274231

White, David S.; Le-Cornu, Alison (2011). "Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement". First Monday, v. 16, n. 9.

Williamson, Kirsty; Kennan, Mary-Anne; Johanson, Graeme; Weckert, John (2016). "Data sharing for the advancement of science: Overcoming barriers for citizen scientists". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 10, pp. 2392-2403.

Willinsky, John (2010). "Open access and academic reputation". Annals of library and information studies. v. 57, pp. 296-302.

Willyard, Cassandra; Scudellari, Megan; Nordling, Linda (2018). "How three research groups are tearing down the ivory tower: The people who should benefit from research are increasingly shaping how it is done". Nature, n. 562, pp. 24-28.

Wilsdon, James; Allen, Liz; Belfiore, Eleonora; Campbell, Philip; Curry, Stephen; Hill, Steven; Jones, Richard; Kain, Roger; Kerridge, Simon; Thelwall, Mike; Tinkler, Jane; Viney, Ian; Wouters, Paul; Hill, Jude; Johnson, Ben (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management.

Wilson, Logan (1942). The academic man: A study in the sociology of a profession. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 1 560008101

Winter, Richard-Philip (2017). Managing academics: A question of perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN: 978 1 781006689

Wolff-Eisenberg, Christine; Rod, Alisa B.; Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016a). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2015. New York, NY.: Ithaka S+R.

Wolff-Eisenberg, Christine; Rod, Alisa B.; Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016b). UK survey of academics 2015: Ithaka S+R | Jisc | RLUK. New York, NY.: Ithaka S+R.

Wood, Phil (2017). "From teaching excellence to emergent pedagogies: A complex process alternative to understanding the role of teaching in higher education". In: French, Amanda; O´Leary, Mat (eds.) Teaching excellence in higher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp. 39-74. ISBN: 978 1 78714 762 1

Wouters, Paul; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan; Waltman, Ludo; De-Rijcke, Sarah; Rushforth, Alex; Franssen, Thomas (2015). The metric tide: Literature review (Supplementary Report I to the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management). The Higher Education Funding Council for England.

Wouters, Paul; Costas, Rodrigo (2012). Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Utrecht: SURF Foundation.

Wray, K. Brad (2006). "Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research". Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 505-514.

Wuchty, Stefan; Jones, Benjamin F.; Uzzi, Brian (2007). "The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge". Science, v. 316, n. 5827, pp. 1036-1039.

Zheng, Han; Erdt, Mojisola; Theng, Yin-Leng (2018). "How do scholars evaluate and promote research outputs? An NTU case study". In: Erdt, Mojisola; Sesagiri-Raamkumar, Aravind; Rasmussen, Edie; Theng, Yin-Leng (eds.). Altmetrics for research outputs measurement and scholarly information management. Arosim 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, v. 856. Singapore: Springer.




Cómo citar

Herman, E., & Nicholas, D. (2019). Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article. Profesional De La información, 28(1).



Artí­culos de revisión / Review articles