A bibliometric perspective on the academic contributions of Loet Leydesdorff
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.dic.06Palabras clave:
Loet Leydesdorff, Bibliometrics, Informetrics, Scientometric portrait, Academic contributions, Researchers, Library and information science, Computer scienceResumen
The purpose of this paper is to commemorate the late scholar Loet Leydesdorff for his great academic contribution on the basis of data from Web of Science. In the span of more than 40 years, he had 526 publications, with the years 2004-2021 being the most productive (394 publications). His international collaborations spread widely across 36 countries, with Germany, the USA, the UK, China, Russia, and South Korea being the most significant. His most frequent collaboration partners included Lutz Bornmann (Germany), Staša Milojević (USA), Caroline Wagner (USA), Henry Etzkowitz (USA), Jonathan Adams (UK), Ronald Rousseau (Belgium), and Ping Zhou (China). With a broad and deep knowledge background, Leydesdorff’s research extended across multiple disciplines and fields, but he was most active in library and information science and computer science. He made profound contributions to the study of bibliometrics, innovation systems (the Triple Helix model), and communications. Leydesdorff had a remarkable and extensive citation impact, with citations in 221 WoS subject categories from 120 countries. His publications in 1996, 1998, 2000, 2005, 2006, and 2012 are highly cited, and those on university-industry-government relations (the Triple Helix model) are the most cited.Descargas
Citas
Bornmann, Lutz; Leydesdorff, Loet (2012). “Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider”. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1210.3477.
Bornmann, Lutz; Leydesdorff, Loet (2017). “Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data”. Journal of informetrics, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.12.001
Bornmann, Lutz; Tekles, Alexander; Leydesdorff, Loet (2019). “How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators”. Scientometrics, v. 119, n. 2, pp. 1187-1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03071-6
Bradford, Samuel C. (1934). “Sources of information on specific subjects”. Engineering, n. 137, pp. 85-86.
Buligina, Ilze; Sloka, Biruta; Dzelme, Juris; Tora, Ginta (2014). Triple Helix for VET: New challenges for public administration in Latvia. Economic Science for Rural Development. ISBN: 978 9934 8466 2 5
Chen, Chaomei; Leydesdorff, Loet (2014). “Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 2, pp. 334-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22968
Dusdal, Jennifer; Powell, Justin J. (2021). “Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: a sociology of science case study”. Science and public policy, v. 48, n. 2, pp. 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab010
Dutta, Bidyarthi (2019). “Biobibliometric portrait of BK Sen: A librarian, information scientist and scientometrician”. Malaysian journal of library & information science, v. 24, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.1
Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (1995). “The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development”. EASST Review, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 11-19.
Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations”. Research policy, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Freeman, R. Edward (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978 0 521 15174 0 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
Garfield, Eugene (1972). “Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies”. Science, v. 178, n. 4060, pp. 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471
Garfield, Eugene; Merton, Robert K. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (vol. 8). New York: Wiley.
Glänzel, Wolfgang; Abdulhayoǧlu, Mehmet Ali (2018). “Garfield number: On some characteristics of Eugene Garfield’s first and second order co-authorship networks”. Scientometrics, v. 114, pp. 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2623-4
González-Alcaide, Gregorio (2014). “Scientometric portrait of biochemist Santiago Grisolía: Publication productivity, collaboration patterns, and citation analysis”. Research evaluation, v. 23, n. 2, pp. 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu003
Gui, Qinchang; Liu, Chengliang; Du, Debin (2019). “Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective”. Geoforum, v. 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017
Halevi, Gali (2020). “The scientific legacy of Judit Bar-Ilan”. Scientometrics, v. 123, n. 3, pp. 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03439-z
Hazarika, Tilak; Sarma, Dipak; Sen, B. K. (2010). “Scientometric portrait of Nayana Nanda Borthakur: a biometeorologist”. Annals of library & information studies, v. 57, n. 1, pp. 21-32.
Ivanova, Inga A.; Leydesdorff, Loet (2014). “Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations”. Technological forecasting and social change, v. 86, pp. 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.022
Kademani, Basavaraj Shivappa.; Kalyane, V.; Jange, Suresh (1999). “Scientometric portrait of nobel laureate Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin”. Scientometrics, v. 45, n. 2, pp. 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458435
Katz, J. Sylvan; Martin, Ben R. (1997). “What is research collaboration?”. Research policy, v. 26, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
Khan, Gohar-Feroz; Han Woo Park (2011). “Measuring the triple helix on the web: Longitudinal trends in the university‐industry‐government relationship in Korea”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 62, n. 12, pp. 2443-2455. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21595
Kim, Minjeong; Han Woo Park (2012). “Measuring Twitter-based political participation and deliberation in the South Korean context by using social network and Triple Helix indicators”. Scientometrics, v. 90, n. 1, pp. 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0508-5
Koley, Susanta; Sen, B. K. (2018). “Biobibliometric portrait of the astronomer Jan Hendrik Oort”. Annals of Library and Information Studies, v. 64, n. 4, pp. 217-228.
Kwon, Ki-Seok; Han Woo Park; So, Minho; Leydesdorff, Loet (2012). “Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea”. Scientometrics, v. 90, n. 1, pp. 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9
Leydesdorff, Loet (2001). A sociological theory of communication: The self-organization of the knowledge-based society. u-Publish.com: Universal-Publishers. ISBN: 1 58112 695 6
Leydesdorff, Loet (2001). The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. u-Publish.com: Universal-Publishers. ISBN: 1 58112 681 6
Leydesdorff, Loet (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. u-Publish.com: Universal-Publishers. ISBN: 1 58112 937 8 https://doi.org/10.3395/reciis.v1i1.36pt
Leydesdorff, Loet (2011). “‘Structuration’ by intellectual organization: the configuration of knowledge in relations among structural components in networks of science”. Scientometrics, v. 88, n. 2, pp. 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0397-7
Leydesdorff, Loet (2018). “Diversity and interdisciplinarity: how can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance?”. Scientometrics, v. 116, pp. 2113-2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2810-y
Leydesdorff, Loet (2021). The evolutionary dynamics of discursive knowledge: Communication-theoretical perspectives on an empirical philosophy of science. Cham: Springer Nature. ISBN: 978 3 030 59950 8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59951-5
Leydesdorff, Loet; Bornmann, Lutz (2016). “The operationalization of ‘fields’ as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of ‘library and information science’ and ‘science & technology studies’”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 3, pp. 707-714. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23408
Leydesdorff, Loet; Bornmann, Lutz (2021). “Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data: Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics?” Journal of informetrics, v. 15, n. 4, p. 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101219
Leydesdorff, Loet; Bornmann, Lutz; Mutz, Rüdiger; Opthof, Tobias (2011). “Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, v. 62, n. 7, pp. 1370-1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21534
Leydesdorff, Loet; Bornmann, Lutz; Wagner, Caroline S. (2021). “Improved clusterings and visualizations of 11,359 journals in the JCRs 2015”. Scientometrics, v. 126, pp. 5353-5354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03938-7
Leydesdorff, Loet; Etzkowitz, Henry (1996). “Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”. Science and public policy, v. 23, n. 5, pp. 279-286.
Leydesdorff, Loet; Etzkowitz, Henry (1998). “The triple helix as a model for innovation studies”. Science and public policy, v. 25, n. 3, pp. 195-203.
Leydesdorff Loet; Ivanova, Inga A. (2016). “‘Open innovation’ and ‘triple helix’ models of innovation: can synergy in innovation systems be measured?”. Journal of open innovation: technology, market, and complexity, v. 2, n. 3, p. 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-016-0039-7
Leydesdorff, Loet; Ivanova, Inga A. (2021). “The measurement of ‘interdisciplinarity’ and ‘synergy’ in scientific and extra-scientific collaborations”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 72, n. 4, pp. 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24416
Leydesdorff Loet; Ivanova, Inga A.; Meyer, Martin (2019). Synergy in innovation systems measured as redundancy in triple helix relations. Cham: Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. ISBN: 978 3 030 02510 6
Leydesdorff, Loet; Liwen, Vaughan (2006). “Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, v. 57, n. 12, pp. 1616-1628. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20335
Leydesdorff, Loet; Meyer, Martin (2003). “The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”. Scientometrics, v. 58, pp. 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026276308287
Leydesdorff, Loet; Meyer, Martin (2006). “Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue”. Research policy, v. 35, n. 10, pp. 1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016
Leydesdorff, Loet; Ràfols, Ismael (2012). “Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web of Science data”. Journal of informetrics, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.003
Leydesdorff, Loet; Staša Milojević (2015). “The citation impact of German sociology journals: Some problems with the use of scientometric indicators in journal and research evaluations”. Soziale Welt, v. 66, n. 2, pp. 193-204. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2015-2-193
Leydesdorff, Loet; Strand, Øivind (2013). “The Swedish system of innovation: Regional synergies in a knowledge‐based economy”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 9, pp. 1890-1902. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22895
Leydesdorff, Loet; Sun, Yuan (2009). “National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international co-authorship relations”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 4, pp. 778-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20997
Leydesdorff, Loet; Tekles, Alexander; Bornmann, Lutz (2021). “A proposal to revise the disruption indicator”. Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 1, e300121. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.ene.21
Leydesdorff, Loet; Wagner, Caroline S. (2008). “International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group”. Journal of informetrics, v. 2, n. 4, pp. 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.003
Leydesdorff, Loet; Wagner, Caroline S.; Bornmann, Lutz (2019). “Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient”. Journal of informetrics, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.006
Leydesdorff, Loet; Wagner, Caroline S.; Park, Han Woo; Adams, Jonathan (2013). “International collaboration in science: The global map and the network”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.0801. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2013.ene.12
Leydesdorff, Loet; Zhang, Lin; Wouters, Paul (2023). “Trajectories and regimes in research versus knowledge evaluations: Contributions to an evolutionary theory of citation”. Profesional de la información, v. 32, n. 1, e320103. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.ene.03
Leydesdorff, Loet; Zhou, Ping (2005). “Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science?”. Scientometrics, v. 63, pp. 617-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0231-1
Leydesdorff, Loet; Zhou, Ping (2014). “Measuring the knowledge-based economy of China in terms of synergy among technological, organizational, and geographic attributes of firms”. Scientometrics, v. 98, pp. 1703-1719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1179-1
Luhmann, Niklas (1984). Soziale systeme: grundriss einer allgemeinen theorie. Suhrkamp.
Luukkonen, Terttu; Persson, Olle; Sivertsen, Gunnar (1992). “Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration”. Science, technology, & human values, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700106
McGill, William J. (1954). “Multivariate information transmission”. Psychometrika, v. 19, n. 2, pp. 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289159
Merton, Robert K. (1968). “The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered”. Science, v. 159, n. 3810, pp. 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Orduña-Malea, Enrique (2020). “Crossing the academic ocean? Judit Bar-Ilan’s oeuvre on search engines studies”. Scientometrics, v. 123, n. 3, pp. 1317-1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03450-4
Park, Han Woo (2014). “Transition from the triple helix to N-tuple helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David FJ Campbell”. Scientometrics, v. 99, n. 1, pp. 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1124-3
Park, Han Woo; Leydesdorff, Loet (2010). “Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives”. Research policy, v. 39, n. 5, pp. 640-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.009
Price-de-Solla, Derek J. (1965). “Networks of scientific papers”. Science, v. 149, n. 3683, pp. 510-515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3683.510
Price-de-Solla, Derek J. (1970). “Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience”. Communication among scientists and engineers, v. 1, 3r22.
Purvis, Andy; Hector, Andy (2000). “Getting the measure of biodiversity”. Nature, v. 405, n. 6783, pp. 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012221
Ràfols, Ismael; Leydesdorff, Loet (2009). “Content‐based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 9, pp. 1823-1835. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21086
Ràfols, Ismael; Meyer, Martin (2010). “Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience”. Scientometrics, v. 82, n. 2, pp. 263-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
Sangam, S.; Savanur, Kiran; Manjunath, M. (2007). “Communication and collaborative research pattern of Sivaraj Ramaseshan: A scientometric portrait”. Scientometrics, v. 71, n. 2, pp. 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1670-7
Shannon, Claude E. (1948). „A mathematical theory of communication“. Bell System technical journal, v. 27, n. 3, pp. 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Stirling, Andy (1998). “On the economics and analysis of diversity”. SPRU Electronic working paper. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp28/sewp28.pdf
Stirling, Andy (2007). “A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society”. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, v. 4, n. 15, pp. 707-719. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2007.0213
Sun, Junwei; Jiang, Chunlin (2012). “Ronald Rousseaus academic thought and the academic exchange with Chinese colleague”. Journal of modern information, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 4-15.
Thagard, Paul (2005). “Being interdisciplinary: Trading zones in cognitive science”. Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science, pp. 317-339.
Theil, Henri (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis: With applications in the social and administrative sciences. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Vellaichamy, A.; Amsan, E. (2016). “Scientometric portrait of Mike Thelwall”. Library philosophy and practice, p. 1487.
Wagner, Caroline S.; Leydesdorff, Loet (2005). „Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science“. Research policy, v. 34, n. 10, pp. 1608-1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
Wagner, Caroline S.; Whetsell, Travis A; Leydesdorff, Loet (2017). “Growth of international collaboration in science: revisiting six specialties”. Scientometrics, v. 110, pp. 1633-1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2230-9
Zhang, Yi; Chen, Kaihua; Fu, Xiaolan (2019). “Scientific effects of Triple Helix interactions among research institutes, industries and universities”. Technovation, v. 86, pp. 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.05.003
Zhou, Ping; Glänzel, Wolfgang (2010). “In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science”. Scientometrics, v. 82, n. 3, pp. 597-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0174-z
Zhou, Ping; Leydesdorff, Loet (2006). “The emergence of China as a leading nation in science”. Research policy, v. 35, n. 1, pp. 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006
Zhou, Ping; Leydesdorff, Loet (2007). “The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese journals in mathematics”. Scientometrics, v. 72, n. 2, pp. 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1713-0
Zhou, Ping; Leydesdorff, Loet (2011). “Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross-and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing”. Journal of informetrics, v. 5, n. 3, pp. 360-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.010
Zhou, Ping; Su, Xinning; Leydesdorff, Loet (2010). “A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences”. Journal of the American society for Information science and Technology, v. 61, n. 7, pp. 1360-1376. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21343
Zhou, Ping; Tijssen, Robert; Leydesdorff, Loet (2016). “University-industry collaboration in China and the USA: A bibliometric comparison”. PloS one, v. 11, n. 11, e0165277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165277
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Profesional de la información
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Condiciones de difusión de los artículos una vez son publicados
Los autores pueden publicitar libremente sus artículos en webs, redes sociales y repositorios
Deberán respetarse sin embargo, las siguientes condiciones:
- Solo deberá hacerse pública la versión editorial. Rogamos que no se publiquen preprints, postprints o pruebas de imprenta.
- Junto con esa copia ha de incluirse una mención específica de la publicación en la que ha aparecido el texto, añadiendo además un enlace clicable a la URL: http://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com
La revista Profesional de la información ofrece los artículos en acceso abierto con una licencia Creative Commons BY.
