Altmetrics for the identification of scientific controversies: The case of NeuroGenderings and neurosexism

Autores/as

  • María Aguilar-Soto Universidad de Granada
  • Nicolás Robinson-Garcí­a Universidad de Granada
  • Benjamín Vargas-Quesada Universidad de Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.nov.10

Palabras clave:

Neurosexism, Scientific controversies, Altmetrics, Sentiment analysis, News, Blogs, Social media, Wikipedia, Reddit, Facebook, Science mapping, Neuroscience, Gender, Sex, Neurogenderings

Resumen

This work presents a methodological proposal for the analysis of social controversies related to scientific literature. This methodology consists of three clearly differentiated parts. First, we identify the cognitive structure of a set of scientific works. To do this, a historiogram is created through the analysis of references cited by seminal works. This allows us to expand the set of works to work with, subsequently conducting a co-word analysis to identify the cognitive structure of the scientific field to be explored. Secondly, we obtain social mentions of this scientific literature using so-called altmetrics. This allows us to extract mentions made to each scientific document from non-academic environments. Finally, we apply sentiment analysis techniques to these mentions to identify focal points of negative sentiment. We test this methodology on the case study of NeuroGenderings, a movement in the field of neuroscience that denounces the lack of scientific evidence in works that claim the existence of brain differences driven by the biological sex of the subjects. Our results confirm the viability of these types of approaches that enable the identification of research areas with greater controversy. Although our study is limited to the analysis of controversies in news, blogs, Facebook, Wikipedia, and Reddit, the methodology can be applied to other domains and social platforms.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao (2023). “La gran apuesta, ¿cuánto afectan los cambios de Twitter a la comunicación científica?”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 17. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a16

Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Costas, Rodrigo (2022). “Wikinformetrics: Construction and description of an open Wikipedia knowledge graph data set for informetric purposes”. Quantitative science studies, v. 3, n. 4, pp. 931-952. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00226

Boyack, Kevin W.; Börner, Katy; Klavans, Richard (2009). “Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research”. Scientometrics, v. 79, n. 1, pp. 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5

Butler, Judith (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge. ISBN: 0415389550

Butler, Judith (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York, London: Routledge. ISBN: 978 0 203760079

Callon, Michel; Courtial, Jean-Pierre; Turner, William A.; Bauin, Serge (1983). “From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis”. Social science information, v. 22, n. 2, pp. 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003

Choudhury, Suparna; Nagel, Saska-Kathi; Slaby, Jan (2009). “Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice”. BioSocieties, v. 4, n. 1, pp. 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855209006437

Cole, Stephen (1983). “The hierarchy of the sciences?” American journal of sociology, v. 89, n. 1, pp. 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1086/227835

Fanelli, Danielle; Glänzel, Wolfgang (2013). “Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences”. PLoS one, v. 8, n. 6, e66938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066938

Fine, Cordelia (2010). Delusions of gender: how our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. Norton & Company. ISBN: 0393340244

Friedrich, Natalie; Bowman, Timothy D.; Stock, Wolfgang G.; Haustein, Stefanie (2015). “Adapting sentiment analysis for tweets linking to scientific papers”. In: Salah, A. A.; Y. Tonta; A.A. Akdag Salah; C. Sugimoto; U. Al (eds.). Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference. Istambul (Turkey), 29 June - 3 July, Bogaziçi University Printhouse, pp. 107-108. https://www.issi-society.org/proceedings/issi_2015/0107.pdf

Griffin, Andrew (2008). New strategies for reputation management: gaining control of issues, crises & corporate social repsonsibility. London: Kogan Page Publishers. ISBN: 978 0 749450076

Hassan, Saaed-Ul; Saleem; Aneela; Soroya, Saira Hanif; Sader, Iqra; Iqbal, Sehrish; Jamil, Saqib; Bukhari, Faisal; Aljohani, Naif Radi; Nawaz, Raheel (2021). “Sentiment analysis of tweets through Altmetrics: A machine learning approach”. Journal of information science, v. 47, n. 6, pp. 712-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520930917

Hyde, Janet-Shibley (2005). “The gender similarities hypothesis”. American psychologist, v. 60, n. 6, pp. 581-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581

Hyde, Janet-Shibley (2014). “Gender similarities and differences”. Annual review of psychology, v. 65, pp. 373-398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057

Jordan-Young, Rebecca; Rumiati, Raffaella. I. (2012). “Hardwired for sexism? Approaches to sex/gender in neuroscience”. Neuroethics, v. 5, n. 3, pp. 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9134-4

Kaiser, Anelis (2012). “Re-conceptualizing ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ in the human brain”. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of psychology, v. 220, n. 2, pp. 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000104

Kaiser, Anelis; Haller, Sven; Schmitz, Sigrid; Nitsch, Cordula (2009). “On sex/gender related similarities and differences in fMRI language research”. Brain research reviews, v. 61, n. 2, pp. 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.03.005

Kostoff, Ronald; Shlesinger, Michael F. (2005). “CAB: Citation-assisted-background”. Scientometrics, v. 62, n. 2, pp. 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0014-8

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978 0 226458113

Lamers, Wout S.; Boyack, Kevin; Larivière, Vincent; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; van Eck, Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo; Murray, Dakota (2021). “Meta-research: Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature”. eLife, v. 10, e72737. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72737

Levay, Simon (1991). “A difference in hypothalmic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men”. Science, v. 253, pp. 1034-1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1887219

Leydesdorff, Loet; Ràfols, Ismael (2012). “Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data”. Journal of informetrics, v. 6, n. 3, pp. 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.003

Muñoz-Écija, Teresa; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida (2017). “Identification and visualization of the intellectual structure and the main research lines in nanoscience and nanotechnology at the worldwide level”. Journal of nanoparticle research, v. 19, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3732-3

Muñoz-Écija, Teresa; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida (2019). “Coping with methods for delineating emerging fields: Nanoscience and nanotechnology as a case study”. Journal of informetrics, v. 13, n. 4, 100976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.100976

Muñoz-Écija, Teresa; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida (2022). “Unveiling cognitive structure and comparative advantages of countries in knowledge domains”. Journal of information science. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221084607

Nane, Gabriela F.; Van-Schalkwyk, François; Dudek, Jonathan; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Costas, Rodrigo; Robinson-García, Nicolás (2021). “The role of scientific output in public debates in times of crisis: A case study of the reopening of schools during the Covid-19 pandemic”. In: Berube, D. M. (ed.). Pandemic communication and resilience. Risk, systems and decisions. Cham: Springer. ISBN: 978 3 030773441

Nicholson, Josh M.; Mordaunt, Milo; Lopez, Patrice; Uppala, Ashish; Rosati, Domenic; Rodrigues, Neves P.; Grabitz, Peter; Rife, Sean C. (2021). “Scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning”. Quantitative science studies, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 882-898. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00146

North, Anna (2019). “‘I am a woman and I am fast’: what Caster Semenya’s story says about gender and race in sports”. Vox. https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/5/3/18526723/caster-semenya-800-gender-race-intersex-athletes

Phoenix, Charles H.; Goy, Robert W.; Gerall, Arnold A.; Young, William C. (1959). “Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behaviour in the female guinea pig”. Endocrinology, v. 65, n. 3, pp. 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-65-3-369

Popper, Karl (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge. ISBN: 978 0 203994627

Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul; Neylon, Cameron (2010), Altmetrics: A manifesto, 26 October 2010. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto

Proellochis, Nicolas; Feuerriegel, Stefan (2021). “Sentiment analysis: Dictionary-based sentiment analysis”. R package version 1.3-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SentimentAnalysis

R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org

Reverter-Bañón, Sonia (2017). “El neurofeminismo frente a la investigación sobre la diferencia sexual”. Daimon, v. 72, pp. 95-110. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/291561

Rippon, Gina; Jordan-Young, Rebecca; Kaiser, Anelis; Fine, Cordelia (2014). “Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: Key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation”. Frontiers in human neuroscience, v. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00650

Rippon, Gina; Jordan-Young, Rebecca; Kaiser, Anelis; Joel, Daphna; Fine, Cordelia (2017). “Journal of neuroscience research policy on addressing sex as a biological variable: Comments, clarifications, and elaborations”. Journal of Neuroscience Research, v. 95, n. 7, pp. 1357-1359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24045

Robinson-García, Nicolás; Ràfols, Ismael; Van-Leeuwen, Thed N. (2018). “Using altmetrics for contextualised mapping of societal impact: From hits to networks”. Science and public policy, v. 45, n. 6, pp. 815-826. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy024

Robinson-García, Nicolás; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo (2014). “New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.com”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 359-366. https://10.3145/epi.2014.jul.03

Scott, John (1988). “Social network analysis”. Sociology, v. 22, n. 1, pp. 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038588022001007

Thelwall, Mike (2020). “Measuring societal impacts of research with altmetrics? Common problems and mistakes”. Journal of economic surveys, v. 35, n. 5, pp. 1302-1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12381

Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Cabezas-Clavijo, Álvaro; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2013). “Altmetrics: nuevos indicadores para la comunicación científica en la Web 2.0”. Comunicar, v. 41. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-05

Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Docampo, Domingo; Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao; Robinson-García, Nicolás (2023). The many publics of science: Using altmetrics to identify common communication channels by scientific field. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7817445

Traag, Vincent A.; Waltman, Ludo; Van-Eck, Nees-Jan (2019). “From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities”. Scientific reports, v. 9, 5233. https://10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z

Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2010). “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping”. Scientometrics, v. 84, n. 2, pp. 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2014). “CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks”. Journal of informetrics, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 802-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.006

Van-Schalkwyk, François; Dudek, Jonathan; Costas, Rodrigo (2020) “Communities of shared interests and cognitive bridges: the case of the anti-vaccination movement on Twitter”. Scientometrics, v. 125, pp. 1499-1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03551-0

Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; Rodríguez, Noel (2017). “Identification and visualization of the intellectual structure in graphene research”. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, v. 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00007

Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2007). Visualizing the structure of science. Springer. ISBN: 3540697276

Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; González-Molina, Antonio (2010). “Showing the essential science structure of a scientific domain and its evolution”. Information visualization, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2009.33

Wasserman, Stanley; Faust, Katherine (1998). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978 0 511815478

Zumbach, David; Bauer, Paul C. (2022). “deeplr: Interface to the ‘DeepL’ translation API”. R package version 2.0.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=deeplr

Publicado

2023-11-28

Cómo citar

Aguilar-Soto, M., Robinson-Garcí­a, N., & Vargas-Quesada, B. (2023). Altmetrics for the identification of scientific controversies: The case of NeuroGenderings and neurosexism. Profesional De La información Information Professional, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.nov.10

Número

Sección

Artí­culos de investigación / Research articles