Consumption of information and citizen´s perception of the sources consulted during the Covid-19 pandemic: A study of the situation based on opinion polls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.jul.13Palabras clave:
COVID-19, Coronavirus, Epidemics, Journalism, Media, Social networks, Social media, Disinformation, Fake news, Infodemic, Disinfodemic, Information sources, News sources, Science, Health, Surveys, Public opinionResumen
The aim of this cross-sectional study is to analyze the consumption of information about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Spain and to ascertain the public´s perception of the role of journalists, the media, the scientific community, and governmental and health authorities. The methodology involved taking a descriptive survey of a sample of 1,800 people who were representative of the Spanish population, were of legal age, and were residents of the 17 autonomous communities, between June 6 and 22, 2022. Age, political leaning, attitude toward vaccines, and level of education were determining variables. The results show that ideology and age are the factors that most condition the use of different types of information sources. Centrists consume more traditional media than those on the political left or right, who are the least likely to obtain their information from traditional media. And left-wingers rely more on official sources, such as health authorities, in contrast to centrists or right-wingers. Anti-vaccinationists (anti-vaxxers) prefer alternative sources. Meanwhile, the use of sources does not differ between men and women. Their consumption behavior is similar, which shows that gender is not a variable that significantly influences information consumption, neither in the selection of sources nor in the perception of the role of science and journalism. In general, the main sources of information consulted during the COVID-19 pandemic were the traditional media and the health authorities. In the context of the pandemic, young people consumed the least information and expressed the greatest distrust in journalism and science.
Descargas
Citas
Allum, Nick; Sturgis, Patrick; Tabourazi, Dimitra; Brunton-Smith, Ian (2008). "Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis". Public understanding of science, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159
Bernal-Triviño, Ana (2020). "Habits and feelings regarding Covid-19 news coverage during lockdown in Spain". Tripodos, n. 49, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2020.49p169-183
Briones, Rowena; Nan, Xiaoli; Madden, Kelly; Waks, Leah (2012). "When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube". Health communication, v. 27, n. 5, pp. 478-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.610258
Calisher, Charles; Carroll, Dennis; Colwell, Rita; Corley, Ronald B.; Daszak, Peter; Drosten, Christian; Enjuanes, Luis; Farrar, Jeremy; Field, Hume; Golding, Josie; Gorbalenya, Alexander; Haagmans, Bart; Hughes, James M.; Karesh, William B.; Keusch, Gerald T.; Lam, Sai-Kit; Lubroth, Juan; Mackenzie, John S.; Madoff, Larry; Mazet, Jonna; Palese, Peter; Perlman, Stanley; Poon, Leo; Roizman, Bernard; Saif, Linda; Subbarao, Kanta; Turner, Mike (2020). "Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting Covid-19". The lancet, v. 395, n. 10226, pp. e42-e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9
Casero-Ripollés, Andreu; Doménech-Fabregat, Hugo; Alonso-Muñoz, Laura (2023). "Percepciones de la ciudadanía española ante la desinformación en tiempos de la Covid-19". Icono 14, v. 21, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1988
Catalán-Matamoros, Daniel; Elías, Carlos (2020). "Vaccine hesitancy in the age of coronavirus and fake news: analysis of journalistic sources in the Spanish quality press". International journal of environmental research and public health, v. 17, n. 21, 8136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218136
Costa-Sánchez, Carmen; López-García, Xosé (2020). "Comunicación y crisis del coronavirus en España. Primeras lecciones". Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 3, e290304. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.04
Daraz, Lubna; Morrow; Allison S.; Ponce, í“scar-Josué; Beuschel, Bradley; Farah, Magdoleen H.; Katabi, Abdulrahman; Alsawas, Mouaz; Majzoub, Abdul M.; Benkhadra, Raed; Seisa Mohamed O.; Ding, Jingyi; Prokop, Larry; Murad, M. Hassan (2019). "Can patients trust online health information? A meta-narrative systematic review addressing the quality of health information on the internet". Journal of general internal medicine, n. 34, pp. 1884-1891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05109-0
Egelhofer, Jana-Laura (2023). "How politicians´ attacks on science communication influence public perceptions of journalists and scientists". Media and communication, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 361-373. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6098
Elías, Carlos (2019). Science on the ropes: decline of scientific culture in the era of fake news. Cham (Suiza): Springer. ISBN: 978 3 030 12977 4
Elías, Carlos (2020). "Expertos/as científicos/as y comunicación gubernamental en la era de las fake news. Análisis de la estrategia informativa del Covid-19 en España". Prisma social, n. 31, pp. 6-39. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/3945
Elías, Carlos; Catalán-Matamoros, Daniel (2020). "Coronavirus in Spain: fear of "˜official´ fake news boosts WhatsApp and alternative sources". Media and communication, v. 8, n. 2, pp. 462-466. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3217
Eysenbach, Gunther (2002). "Infodemiology: The epidemiology of (mis)information". The American journal of medicine, v. 113, n. 9, pp. 763-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01473-0
Eysenbach, Gunther (2020). "How to fight an infodemic: The four pillars of infodemic management". Journal of medical internet research, v. 22, n. 6, e21820. https://doi.org/10.2196/21820
Francés-Lecumberri, Paz (2020). "Expresiones punitivas en la emergencia de la Covid-19". En: Rivera Beiras, I. (coord.). Pandemia: derechos humanos, sistema penal y control social (en tiempos de coronavirus). Valencia: Tirant Humanidades, pp. 93-109. ISBN: 978 84 13554396
Fraser, Nicholas; Brierley, Liam; Dey, Gautam; Polka, Jessica-Kathleen; Pálfy, Máté; Nanni, Federico; Coates, Jonathon-Alexis (2021). "The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of Covid-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape". PLoS biology, v. 19, n. 4, e3000959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959
Freeman, Daniel; Waite, Felicity; Rosebrock, Laina; Petit, Ariane; Causier, Chiara; East, Anna; Jenner, Lucy; Teale, Ashley-Louise; Carr, Lydia; Mulhall, Sophie; Bold, Emily; Lambe, Sinéad (2022). "Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England". Psychological medicine, v. 52, n. 2, pp. 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890
Gallotti, Riccardo; Valle, Francesco; Castaldo, Nicola; Sacco, Pierlugi; De-Domenico, Manlio (2020). "Assessing the risks of "˜infodemics´ in response to Covid-19 epidemics". Nature human behaviour, n. 4, pp. 1285-1293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00994-6
Garrett, Laurie (2020). "Covid-19: the medium is the message". The lancet, v. 395, n. 10228, pp. 942-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30600-0
Gauchat, Gordon (2012). "Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010". American sociological review, v. 77, n. 2, pp. 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225
Hamilton, Lawrence C. (2015). "Conservative and liberal views of science: does trust depend on topic?". The Carsey School of Public Policy at the Scholars´ Repository, 252. https://scholars.unh.edu/carsey/252
Hartman, Robert O.; Dieckmann, Nathan F.; Sprenger, Amber M.; Stastny, Bradley J.; DeMarree, Kenneth G. (2017). "Modeling attitudes toward science: development and validation of the credibility of science scale". Basic and applied social psychology, v. 39, n. 6, pp. 358-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1372284
Hauer, Michael K.; Sood, Suruchi (2020). "Using social media to communicate sustainable preventive measures and curtail misinformation". Frontiers in psychology, v. 11, 568324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568324
Introne, Joshua; Gokce-Yildirim, Irem; Iandoli, Luca; DeCook, Julia; Elzeini, Shaima (2018). "How people weave online information into pseudoknowledge". Social media + society, v. 4, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118785639
Islam, Saiful; Sarkar, Tonmoy; Khan, Sazzad-Hossain; Mostofa-Kamal, Abu-Hena; Murshid-Hasan, S. M.; Kabir, Alamgir; Yeasmin, Dalia; Islam, Mohammad-Ariful; Amin-Chowdhury, Kamal-Ibne; Anwar, Kazi-Selim; Chughtai, Abrar-Ahmad; Seale, Holly (2020). "Covid-19 related infodemic and its impact on public health: a global social media analysis". The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, v. 103, n. 4, pp. 1621-1629. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812
Jolley, Daniel; Lamberty, Pia (2020). "Coronavirus is a breeding ground for conspiracy theories - here´s why that´s a serious problem". The Conversation, 28 February. https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-is-a-breeding-ground-for-conspiracy-theories-heres-why-thats-a-serious-problem-132489
Kí¶nig, Lars; Breves, Priska (2021). "Providing health information via Twitter: professional background and message style influence source trustworthiness, message credibility and behavioral intentions". Journal of science communication, v. 20, n. 4, A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20040204
Legido-Quigley, Helena; Mateos-García, José-Tomás; Regulez-Campos, Victoria; Gea-Sánchez, Montserrat; Muntaner, Carles; McKee, Martin (2020). "The resilience of the Spanish health system against the Covid-19 pandemic". The lancet public health, v. 5, n. 5, e251-e252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30060-8
León, Bienvenido; Martínez-Costa, María-Pilar; Salaverría, Ramón; López-Goñi, Ignacio (2022). "Health and science-related disinformation on Covid-19: A content analysis of hoaxes identified by fact-checkers in Spain. PLoS one, v. 17, n. 4, e0265995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265995
Lewandowsky, Stephan; Gignac, Gilles E.; Oberauer, Klaus (2013a). "The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science". PLoS one, v. 8, n. 10, e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
Lewandowsky, Stephan; Oberauer, Klaus (2016). "Motivated rejection of science". Current directions in psychological science, v. 25, n. 4, pp. 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416654436
Lewandowsky, Stephan; Oberauer, Klaus; Gignac, Gilles E. (2013b). "NASA faked the moon landing - therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science". Psychological science, v. 24, n. 5, pp. 622-633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686
Lobato, Emilio J. C.; Mendoza, Jorge; Sims, Valerie; Chin, Matthew (2014). "Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population". Applied cognitive psychology, v. 28, n. 5, pp. 617-625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
Lobato, Emilio J. C.; Zimmerman, Corinne (2019). "Examining how people reason about controversial scientific topics". Thinking & reasoning, v. 25, n. 2, pp. 231-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1521870
Malhotra, Manoj K.; Grover, Varun (1998). "An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory". Journal of operations management, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00021-7
McMurray, Adela J.; Pace, R. Wayne; Scott, Don (2004). Research: A commonsense approach. Victoria, Australia: Thomson Social Science Press. ISBN: 978 0 170122351
Mian, Areeb; Khan, Shujhat (2020). "Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation". BMC medicine, v. 18, n. 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3
Naeem, Salman-Bin; Bhatti, Rubina; Khan, Aqsa (2020). "An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk". Health information & libraries journal, v. 38, n. 2, pp. 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12320
Nogrady, Bianca (2021). ""˜I hope you die´: how the Covid pandemic unleashed attacks on scientists". Nature, n. 598, pp. 250-253. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02741-x
O´Grady, Cathleen (2022). "In the line of fire". Science, v. 375, n. 6587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq1538
Oppenheim, Abraham-Naftali (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Londres: Pinter Publishers. ISBN: 1 85567 043 7
Patel, Mohan P.; Kute, Vivek B.; Agarwal, Sanjay K. (2020). ""˜Infodemic´ Covid-19: more pandemic than the virus". Indian journal of nephrology, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 188-191. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470201/
Pennycook, Gordon; McPhetres, Jonathon; Zhang, Yunhao; Lu, Jackson G.; Rand, David G. (2020). "Fighting Covid-19 misinformation on social media: experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention". Psychological science, v. 31, n. 7, pp. 770-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
Posetti, Julie; Bontcheva, Kalina (2020a). Desinfodemia: descifrando la desinformación sobre el Covid-19. Unesco, Policy brief 1. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374416_spa
Posetti, Julie; Bontcheva, Kalina (2020b). Desinfodemia: disección de las respuestas a la desinformación sobre el Covid-19. Unesco, Policy brief 2. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374417_spa
Quian, Alberto (2023). "(Des)infodemia: lecciones de la crisis de la Covid-19". Revista de ciencias de la comunicación e información, n. 28. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2023.28.e274
Rea, Louis M.; Parker, Richard A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978 1 118 76703 0
Roozenbeek, Jon; Schneider, Claudia R.; Dryhurst, Sarah; Kerr, John; Freeman, Alexandra L. J.; Recchia, Gabriel; Van-der-Bles, Anne-Marthe, Van-der-Linden, Sander (2020). "Susceptibility to misinformation about Covid-19 around the world". Royal Society open science, v. 7, n. 10, 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
Rossi, Peter H.; Wright, James D.; Anderson, Andy B. (2013). Handbook of survey research. Academic Press: New York. ISBN: 978 1 483276304
Solomon, Daniel H.; Bucala, Richard; Kaplan, Mariana J.; Nigrovic, Peter A. (2020). "The "˜infodemic´ of Covid-19". Arthritis & rheumatology, v. 72, n. 11, pp. 1806-1808. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41468
Tangcharoensathien, Viroj; Calleja, Neville; Nguyen, Tim; Purnat, Tina; D´Agostino, Marcelo; García-Saisó, Sebastián; Landry, Mark; Rashidia, Arash; Hamilton, Clayton; AbdAllah, Abdelhalim; Ghiga, Iona; Hill, Alexandra; Hougendobler, Daniel; Van-Andel, Judith; Nunn, Mark; Brooks, Ian; Sacco, Pier-Luigi; De-Domenico, Manlio; Mai, Philip; Gruzd, Anatoliy; Alaphilippe, Alexandre; Briand, Sylvie (2020). "Framework for managing the Covid-19 infodemic: methods and results of an online, crowdsourced WHO technical consultation". Journal of medical internet research, v. 22, n. 6, e19659. https://doi.org/10.2196/19659
The lancet infectious diseases (2020). "The covid-19 infodemic". The lancet infectious diseases, v. 20, n. 8, p. 875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30565-X
Tomes, Nancy (2020). "Managing the modern infodemic". Canadian Medical Association journal, v. 192, n. 43, pp. E1311-E1312. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.201905
United Nations (2020). "UN tackles "˜infodemic´ of misinformation and cybercrime in Covid-19 crisis". The United Nations Department of Global Communications, 31 March. https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/un-tackling-%E2%80%98infodemic%E2%80%99-misinformation-and-cybercrime-covid-19
Van-der-Linden, Sander (2015). "The conspiracy-effect: exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance". Personality and individual differences, v. 87, pp. 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045
Zarocostas, John (2020). "How to fight an infodemic". The lancet, v. 395, n. 10225, p. 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Profesional de la información
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Condiciones de difusión de los artículos una vez son publicados
Los autores pueden publicitar libremente sus artículos en webs, redes sociales y repositorios
Deberán respetarse sin embargo, las siguientes condiciones:
- Solo deberá hacerse pública la versión editorial. Rogamos que no se publiquen preprints, postprints o pruebas de imprenta.
- Junto con esa copia ha de incluirse una mención específica de la publicación en la que ha aparecido el texto, añadiendo además un enlace clicable a la URL: http://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com
La revista Profesional de la información ofrece los artículos en acceso abierto con una licencia Creative Commons BY.