Drivers and barriers in the transition to open science: the perspective of stakeholders in the Spanish scientific community



Palabras clave:

Open science, Open access, Open research data, Research assessment, Open peer review, Scientific system, Legislation, Research funding, Feasibility, Spain


This paper presents the results of a research study whose objective was to identify the facilitating factors and barriers that, in the opinion of representatives of the Spanish scientific community, impact the implementation of the new open science model in four areas: open access, open research data, research assessment and open peer review. A qualitative study was designed in which information was obtained through interviews with researchers, editors of scientific journals, representatives of assessment agencies and vice-chancellors, and through a focus group of librarians with expertise in aspects of open science. The enabling factors and barriers identified were related to the researcher and the fruit of their research, as well as to the scientific ecosystem, which provides direct institutional support and backing (universities/research centres), the regulatory framework (management of the science system) and the science communication system (media). The results indicate that a shift in scientific practices toward the open science model can only be achieved if there is a policy framework that integrates all initiatives and links into the scientific assessment and reward system, and if the necessary funding is in place to support this transition.


Abadal, Ernest (2017). Revistas científicas: situación actual y retos de futuro. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat de Barcelona. ISBN: 978 84 91680048

Abadal, Ernest; López-Borrull, Alexandre; Ollé-Castellà, Candela; García-Grimau, Francesc (2019). “El plan S para acelerar el acceso abierto: contexto, retos y debate generado”., n. 19, pp. 75-83.

Abad-García, María-Francisca; González-Teruel, Aurora; González-Llinares, Javier (2018). “Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at finding Spanish articles in repositories”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 69, n. 4, pp. 619-622.

Allen, Christopher; Mehler, David M. A. (2019). “Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond”. PLoS biology, v. 17, n. 5, e3000587.

Anglada, Lluís; Abadal, Ernest (2018). “¿Qué es la ciencia abierta?”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 12, n. 2, pp. 292-298.

Bartling, Sönke; Friesike, Sascha (2014). Opening science: the evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Mannheim: Springer Open. ISBN: 978 3 319342573

Boeije, Hennie (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage. ISBN: 978 1 847870063

Borrego, Ángel (2016). “Measuring compliance with a Spanish Government open access mandate”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 4, pp. 757-764.

Borrego, Ángel; Anglada, Lluís; Abadal, Ernest (2021). “Transformative agreements: do they pave the way to open access?”. Learned publishing, v. 34, n. 2, pp. 216–232.

Cabello-Valdés, Cecilia; Esposito, Fulvio; Kaunismaa, Eeva; Maas, Katrien; McAllister, David; Metcalfe, Janet; O’Carroll, Conor; Rentier, Bernard; Vandevelde, Karen (2017). Evaluation of research careers fully acknowledging open science practices: rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing open science. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN: 978 92 79705151

Cosce (2021). Informe Cosce de urgencia ante una inmediata propuesta de reforma de la Ley de la Ciencia y la Innovación (Ley 14/2011, de 1 de junio, de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación). Informes Cosce. Madrid: Confederación de Sociedades Científicas de España.

Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; Ràfols, Ismael; Abadal, Ernest (2021). “Letter: A call for a radical change in research evaluation in Spain”. Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 3, e300309.

Digital Science; Hahnel, Mark; McIntosh, Leslie D.; Hyndman, Alan; Baynes, Grace; Crosas, Mercè; Nosek, Brian; Sherer, Kathleen; Van-Selm, Mariette; Goodey, Greg; Nature research. The state of open data 2020.

European Comission (2013). Digital science in Horizon 2020.

European Comission (2014). Public consultation: ‘Science 2.0’: Science in transition (background document). Brussels: Directorates-General for Research and Innovation (RTD) and Communications Networks, Content and Technology (Connect).

European Comission (2016). Open innovation, open science, open to the world: A vision for Europe. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. ISBN: 978 92 79573460

European Comission (2018). “Commission recommendation (EU) 2018/790 of 25 April 2018 on access to and preservation of scientific information”. Official journal of the European Union, n. L 134/12 of 31/05/2018.

European Comission (2019). “Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information (Recast)”. Official journal of the European Union, n. L 172/56 of 26/06/2019.

European Comission (2021). Towards a reform of the research assessment system: scoping report. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.

Fecher, Benedikt; Friesike, Sascha (2013). “Open science: one term, five schools of thought”. SSRN electronic journal, RatSWD_WP.

Fecyt (2016). Informe de la Comisión de Seguimiento sobre el Grado de Cumplimiento del Artículo 37 de la Ley de la Ciencia.

Ferreira, Miguel; Baptista, Ana-Alice; Rodrigues, Eloy; Saraiva, Ricardo (2008). “Carrots and sticks: some ideas on how to create a successful institutional repository”. D-Lib magazine, v. 14, n. 1/2.

Ferreras-Fernández, Tránsito (2021). “Hacia una nueva generación de repositorios institucionales en España en el marco de la ciencia abierta”. En: Borges, Maria-Manuel; Sanz-Casado, Elías. Sob a lente da ciência aberta: olhares de Portugal, Espanha e Brasil. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, pp. 295-336. ISBN 978 989 2620220

Foster (2018). The future of science is open.

Fry, Jenny; Schroeder, Ralph; Besten, Matthijs (2009). “Open science in e‐science: contingency or policy?”. Journal of documentation, v. 65, n. 1, pp. 6-32.

Gagliardi, Dimitri; Cox, Deborah; Li, Yanchao (2015). “Institutional inertia and barriers to the adoption of open science”. In: Reale, Emanuela; Primeri, Emilia. The transformation of university institutional and organizational boundaries. Rotterdam, Boston: Sense, pp. 107-133. ISBN: 978 94 63001786

Heise, Christian; Pearce, Joshua M. (2020). “From open access to open science: the path from scientific reality to open scientific communication”. Sage open, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 1-14.

Iribarren-Maestro, Isabel; Grandal, Teresa; Alecha, María; Nieva, Ana; San-Julián, Teresa (2015). “Apoyando la investigación: nuevos roles en el servicio de bibliotecas de la Universidad de Navarra”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 2, pp. 131-137.

Larivière, Vincent; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2018). “Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?”. Nature, v. 562, n. 7728, pp. 486-486.

LERU (2018). “Open science and its role in universities: a roadmap for cultural change”, n. 24.

Levin, Nadine; Leonelli, Sabina; Weckowska, Dagmara; Castle, David; Dupré, John (2016). “How do scientists define openness? Exploring the relationship between open science policies and research practice”. Bulletin of science, technology & society, v. 36, n. 2, pp. 128-141.

Liber (2017). “Research libraries powering sustainable knowledge in the digital age: Liber Europe strategy 2018-2022”.

Lincoln, Yvonna S.; Guba, Egon G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. ISBN: 978 0 803924314

Melero, Remedios; Melero-Fuentes, David; Rodríguez-Gairín, Josep-Manuel (2018). “Monitoring compliance with governmental and institutional open access policies across Spanish universities”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 4, pp. 858-878.

Melibea. Directorio y estimador de políticas en favor del acceso abierto a la producción científica.

Méndez, Eva (2021). “Open science por defecto. La nueva normalidad para la investigación”. Arbor, v. 197, n. 799, a587.

Nosek, Brian (2019). “Strategy for culture change”, COS Center of Open Science, June 11th.

Pardo-Martínez, Clara; Cotte-Poveda, Alexander (2018). “Knowledge and perceptions of open science among researchers. A case study for Colombia”. Information, v. 9, n. 11, 292.

Patton, Michael-Quin (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage. ISBN: 978 0 761919711

Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Nicholas, David (2020). “Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progreso: comportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles”. El profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 5, e290503.

Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2017). “Spanish researchers’ opinions, attitudes and practices towards open access publishing”. El profesional de la información, v. 26, n. 4, pp. 722-734.

Saenen, Bregt; Morais, Rita; Gaillard, Vinciane; Borrell-Damián, Lidia (2019). Research assessment in the transition to open science: 2019 EUA open science and access survey results. Brussels: European University Association.

Secretaría General de Investigación (2021). Estrategia española de ciencia, tecnología e innovación (Eecti) 2021-2027.

Segado-Boj, Francisco; Martín-Quevedo, Juan; Prieto-Gutiérrez, Juan-José (2018). “Attitudes toward open access, open peer review, and altmetrics among contributors contributors to Spanish scholarly journals”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 50, n. 1, pp. 48-70.

Stieglitz, Stefan; Wilms, Konstantin; Mirbabaie, Milad; Hofeditz, Lennart; Brenger, Bela; López, Ania; Rehwald, Stephanie (2020). “When are researchers willing to share their data? Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia”. PLoS one, v. 15, n. 7, e0234172.

Tahamtan, Iman; Bornmann, Lutz (2020). “Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: match or mismatch? A literature review”. El profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 1, e290102.

Thelwall, Mike; Allen, Liz; Papas, Eleanor-Rose; Nyakoojo, Zena; Weigert, Verena (2021). “Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model”. Journal of information science, v. 47, n. 6, pp. 809-820.

Unesco. “Draft text of the Unesco recommendation on open science”.

Wilsdon, James (2017). The metric tide: independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. London: Sage.

Zuiderwijk, Anneke; Shinde, Rhythima; Jeng, Wei (2020). “What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption”. PLoS one, v. 15, n. 9, e0239283.



Cómo citar

González-Teruel, A., López-Borrull, A., Santos-Hermosa, G., Abad-García, F., Ollé, C., & Serrano-Vicente, R. (2022). Drivers and barriers in the transition to open science: the perspective of stakeholders in the Spanish scientific community. Profesional De La información, 31(3).



Artículos de investigación / Research articles


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.


Cargando métricas ...