Technology and democracy: the who and how in decision-making. The cases of Estonia and Catalonia



Palabras clave:

Voto por internet, participación online, plataforma digital, Democracia Representativa, Democracia Agregativa, Democracia Directa, Democracia Deliberativa, Estonia, Cataluña, Decidim


This paper focusses on the use of technology to improve democracy, comparing the cases of Estonia and Catalonia. Both examples are closely related in their use of technology to further democratize the decision-making processes, but have opposite starting points. Estonia’s internet voting system is an offshoot of the comprehensive e-governance system developed by the Estonian government. It is meant to make it more convenient for people to vote and, thus, easier for them to take part in elections. In Catalonia, the online participation system Decidim, initially set up in the city of Barcelona, represents a bottom-up project that emerged from the 15 May protests and aims to make the representative democratic system more direct and participatory. In our comparison we approach both paradigmatic cases from a theoretical reflection on the ideal types of democracy in relation to how decisions are made and by whom. Both projects have evolved and integrated new features that draw them together. First, internet voting is able to reach wider portions of society and digitally transform the Public Administration. Second, online participation platforms increase the potential for collecting citizens’ proposals and enriching discussions. These features make them more like a mixed model which, in the current model of representative democracy, creates spaces for a more direct and deliberative democracy. 


Alvarez, Michael; Hall, Thad; Trechsel, Alexander (2009). “Internet voting in comparative perspective: the case of Estonia”. PS: Political science and politics, v. 42, n. July, pp. 497-505.

Aragón, Pablo; Kaltenbrunner, Andreas; Calleja-López, Antonio; Pereira, Andrés; Monterde, Arnau, Barandiaran, Xabier E.; Gómez, Vicenç (2017). “Deliberative platform design: The case study of the online discussions in Decidim Barcelona”. In: Ciampaglia, Giovanni; Mashhadi, Afra; Yasseri, Taha (eds.). Social informatics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 277-287. ISBN: 978 3 319 67255 7

Bächtiger, André; Niemeyer, Simon; Neblo, Michael; Steenbergen, Marco R.; Steiner, Jürg (2010). “Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities”. The journal of political philosophy, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 32-63.

Barber, Benjamin (2020). Democracia fuerte. Córdoba: Almuzara. ISBN: 978 84 93337841

Barrientos-del-Monte, Fernando (2019). “Dimensiones discursivas entorno al voto electrónico”. Revista de ciencia política, v. 27, n. 1, pp. 111-131.

Besson, Samantha; Martí, Josep-Lluís (2006). Deliberative democracy and its discontents. Aldershot: Ashgate. ISBN: 978 1 138257146

Borge, Rosa; Balcells, Joan; Padró-Solanet, Albert (2019). “A model for the analysis of online citizen deliberation: Barcelona case study”. International journal of communication, v. 13.

Borge, Rosa; Balcells, Joan; Padró-Solanet, Albert; Batlle, Albert; Orte, Andreu; Serra, Ricardo (2018). “La participación política a través de la plataforma Decidim: análisis de 11 municipios catalanes”. En: IX Congreso internacional en gobierno, administración y políticas públicas (Gigapp). Madrid, 24-27 septiembre.

Bua, Adrian; Bussu, Sonia (2020). “Between governance-driven democratisation and democracy-driven governance: Explaining changes in participatory governance in the case of Barcelona”. European journal of political research, v. 60, pp. 716-737.

Canovan, Margaret (1999). “Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy”. Political studies, v. 47, n. 1, pp. 2-16.

Celeste, Richard; Thornburgh, Dick; Lin, Herbert (2006). Asking the right questions about electronic voting. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. ISBN: 978 0 309100243

Deseriis, Marco; Vittori, Davide (2019). “The impact of online participation platforms on the internal democracy of two southern European parties: Podemos and the Five Star Movement”. International journal of communication, v. 13, pp. 5696-5714.

Downs, Anthony (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers. ISBN: 978 0 060417505

Drechsler, Wolfgang; Madise, Ülle (2002). “E-voting in Estonia”. Trames, v. 6, n. 56/51, pp. 234-244.

Ernsdorff, Marc; Berbec, Adriana (2007). “Estonia: the short road to e-government and e-democracy”. In: Nixon, Paul; Koutrakou, Vassiliki (eds.). E-government in Europe: Re-booting the state. New York: Routledge, pp. 171-184.

Eurostat (2021). Digital economy and society statistics - households and individuals.

Fischer, Frank (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 199242641

Fishkin, James (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN: 978 0 300 15668 3

Fung, Archon (2015). “Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future”. Public administration review, v. 75, n. 4, pp. 513-522.

Ganuza, Ernesto; Mendiharat, Arantxa (2020). La democracia es posible. Sorteo cívico y deliberación para rescatar el poder de la ciudadanía. Madrid: Consonni. ISBN: 978 84 16205 55 4

Germann, Micha; Serdült, Uwe (2017). “Internet voting and turnout: Evidence from Switzerland”. Electoral studies, v. 47.

Gjøsteen, Kristjan (2012). “The Norwegian internet voting protocol”. In: Kiayias, Aggelos; Lipmaa, Helger (eds.). Voting and identity. Vote-ID 2011. Cham: Springer, pp. 1-18. ISBN: 978 3 642 32747 6

Gomà, Ricard; Font, Joan (2001). “La democracia local: un mapa de experiencias participativas”. En: Font, Joan (ed.), Ciudadanos y decisiones públicas. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 61-76. ISBN: 84 344 1818 5

Goodman, Nicole; Smith, Rodney (2017). “Internet voting in sub-national elections: Policy learning in Canada and Australia”. In: Krimmer, Robert; Volkamer, Melanie; Barrat, Jordi; Benaloh, Josh; Goodman, Nicole; Ryan, Peter; Teague, Vanessa (eds.). E-Vote-ID 2016. Cham: Springer, pp. 164-177. ISBN: 978 3 319522395

Gronke, Paul; Galanes-Rosenbaum, Eva; Miller, Peter; Toffey, Daniel (2008). “Convenience voting”. Annual review of political science, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 437-455.

Gutmann, Amy; Thompson, Dennis (2004). Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978 0 691120195

Habermas, Jürgen (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN: 978 0 745 60386 5

Hajer, Maarten; Wagenaar, Hendrik (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978 0 521530705

Halderman, Alexander; Teague, Vanessa (2015). “The New South Wales iVote system: Security failures and verification flaws in a live online election”. In: Haenni, Ralf; Koenig, Reto; Wikström, Douglas (eds.), E-Voting and identity. Vote-ID 2015. Cham: Springer, 35-53. ISBN: 978 3 319 22270 7

Heller, Nathan (2017). “Estonia, the digital republic”. The New Yorker.

Hinsberg, Hille (2007). “Osalusdemokraatia veebi kaudu”. Infotehnoloogia avalikus halduses. Tallin.

Kalvet, Tarmo (2012). “Innovation: a factor explaining e-government success in Estonia”. Electronic government, an international journal, v. 9, n. 2, pp. 142-157.

Kankanhalli, Atreyi; Zuiderwijk, Anneke; Tayi, Giri (2017). “Open innovation in the public sector: A research agenda”. Government information quarterly, v. 34, n. 1, pp. 84-89.

Kitsing, Meelis (2011). “Success without strategy: E-government development in Estonia”. Policy & internet, v. 3, n. 1.

Klinger, Ulrike; Russmann, Uta (2015). “The sociodemographics of political public deliberation: Measuring deliberative quality in different user groups”. Communications, v. 40, n. 4, pp. 471-484.

Krenjova, Jelizaveta; Raudla, Ringa (2018). “Policy diffusion at the local level: Participatory budgeting in Estonia”. Urban affairs review, v. 54, n. 2, pp. 419-447.

Krimmer, Robert; Duenas-Cid, David (2019). “Efecto contagio en el uso del voto electrónico en Estonia: de las elecciones a otros niveles de la administración pública y la sociedad”. En: Barrat, Jordi; Pérez-Moneo, Miguel (eds.). La digitalización de los partidos políticos y el uso del voto electrónico. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi Thompson Reuters, pp. 247-262. ISBN: 978 84 13099590

Krimmer, Robert; Duenas-Cid, David; Krivonosova, Iuliia (2021). “New methodology for calculating cost-efficiency of different ways of voting: is internet voting cheaper?”. Public money & management, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 17-26.

Krivonosova, Iuliia (2021). “The forgotten election administrator of internet voting: lessons from Estonia”. Policy studies, online first.

Licht, Nathan; Duenas-Cid, David; Krivonosova, Iulia; Krimmer, Robert (2021). “To i-vote or not to i-vote: Drivers and barriers to the implementation of internet voting”. In: Electronic Voting. 6th International Joint Conference, E-Vote-ID 2021. Springer, Cham.

Mair, Peter (2013). Ruling the void. The hollowing of Western democracy. London: Verso. ISBN: 978 1 844673247

Manin, Bernard (1997). The principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mansbridge, Jane (1981). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978 0 226503554

Mcpherson, Crawford (1964). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 195444018

Méndez, Fernando (2010). “Elections and the internet: On the difficulties of ‘upgrading’ elections in the digital era”. Representation, v. 46, n. 4, pp. 459-469.

Méndez, Fernando; Serdült, Uwe (2017). “What drives fidelity to internet voting? Evidence from the roll-out of internet voting in Switzerland”. Government information quarterly, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 511-523.

Mergel, Ines (2015). “Open collaboration in the public sector: The case of social coding on GitHub”. Government information quarterly, v. 32, n. 4, pp. 464-472.

Morozov, Evgeny (2013). To save everything, click here: the folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs. ISBN: 978 1 610391382

O’Reilly, Tim (2011). “Government as a platform”. Innovations: Technology, governance, globalization, v. 6, n. 1, pp. 13-40.

Oostveen, Anne-Marie (2010). “Outsourcing democracy: Losing control of e-voting in The Netherlands”. Policy & internet, v. 2, n. 4, pp. 201-220.

Oostveen, Anne-Marie; Van-den-Besselaar, Peter (2004). “Security as belief: User’s perceptions on the security of electronic voting systems”. Electronic voting in Europe: Technology, law, politics and society, v. 47, pp. 73-82.

Oszlak, Oscar (2014). Gobierno abierto: Hacia un nuevo paradigma de gestión pública. Santiago de Chile: Red de Go­bierno Electrónico de América Latina y el Caribe. Colección de documentos de trabajo sobre e-Gobierno, n. 5, pp. 1-35.

Peña, José-Antonio; Fundación para el Avance de la Libertad (2020). Índice mundial de libertad electoral (IMLE) 2020. España: Freedom Press. ISBN: 978 84 949138 4 6

Peña-López, Ismael (2020). “El ecosistema de gobernanza pública: las instituciones como infraestructuras abiertas para la toma de decisiones colectivas”. En: Reniu, Josep-Maria; Meseguer, Víctor (eds.). ¿Política confinada? Nuevas tecnologías y toma de decisiones en un contexto de pandemia. Cizur Menor: Thomson-Aranzadi, pp. 53-71. ISBN: 9788413450285

Pitkin, Hanna-Fenichel (1985). El concepto de la representación. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales. ISBN: 84 259 0723 3

Rosanvallon, Pierre (2011). Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality, reflexivity, proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978 0 691149486

Rottinghaus, Bastian; Escher, Tobias (2020). “Mechanisms for inclusion and exclusion through digital political participation: Evidence from a comparative study of online consultations in three German cities”. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, v. 30, pp. 261-298.

Sarapuu, Külli; Saarnit, Leno (2020). “Public administration in Estonia: A search for identity”. In: Bouckaert, Geert; Jaan, Werner (eds.). European perspectives for public administration: The way forward. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 317-334.

Sartori, Giovanni (2007). ¿Qué es la democracia?. Barcelona: Taurus. ISBN: 978 84 30606238

Schumpeter, Joseph (1994). Capitalism, socialism & democracy. Oxfordshire: Routledge. ISBN: 0 415 10762 8

Solvak, Mihkel; Vassil, Kristjan (2016). E-voting in Estonia: Technological diffusion and other developments over ten years. Tartu: Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies.

Solvak, Mihkel; Vassil, Kristjan (2018). “Could internet voting halt declining electoral turnout? New evidence that e-voting is habit forming”. Policy and internet, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 4-21.

Springall, Drew; Finkenauer, Travis; Durumeric, Zakir; Kitcat, Jason; Hursti, Harri; MacAlpine, Margaret; Halderman, J. Alex (2014). “Security analysis of the Estonian internet voting system”. In: Ahn, Gail-Joon (ed.). Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on computer and communications security. Scotsdale: ACM, pp. 703-715. ISBN: 978 1 4503 2957 6

Toots, Maarja (2019). “Why e-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia’s”. Government information quarterly, v. 36, n. 3, pp. 546-559.

Toots, Maarja; Kalvet, Tarmo; Krimmer, Robert (2016). “Success in evoting - Success in edemocracy? The Estonian paradox”. In: Tambouris, Efthimios; Panagiotopoulos, Panos; Sæbø, Øystein; Wimmer, Maria; Pardo, Theresa; Charalabidis, Yannis; Soares, Delfina-Sá; Janowski, Tomasz (eds.). 8th International conference on electronic participation (ePart), Guimaraes: LNCS, pp. 55-66. ISBN: 978 3 319 45073 5

V-DEM Institute (2021). Autocratization turns viral. Democracy report 2021. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

Vassil, Kristjan; Solvak, Mihkel; Vinkel, Priit; Trechsel, Alexander; Alvarez, Michael (2016). “The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015”. Government information quarterly, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 453-459.

Vassil, Kristjan; Weber, Till (2011). “A bottleneck model of e-voting: Why technology fails to boost turnout”. New media and society, v. 13, n. 8, pp. 1336-1354.

Von-Reybrouck, David (2017). Contra las elecciones. Cómo salvar la democracia. Madrid: Taurus. ISBN: 978 84 30618422

Yin, Robert (2019). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN: 978 1 452242569



Cómo citar

Borge, R., Brugué, J., & Duenas-Cid, D. (2022). Technology and democracy: the who and how in decision-making. The cases of Estonia and Catalonia. Profesional De La información, 31(3).



Artículos de investigación / Research articles


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.


Cargando métricas ...