Global-level relationships of international student mobility and research mentions on social media


This paper explores the structural connectedness and associations of international student mobility and scholarly communication on a global scale. First, it examines the exchange of international students. Next, it investigates network structures of international student mobility and scholarly communication on two social media platforms, Twitter and Mendeley. It also determines which social media platform predicts more inter-country student exchange networks than the other and their statistical relationship. Data are obtained from Unesco for student mobility networks and for scholarly communication on social media. Scholarly communication activities are measured by two factors: Mendeley-based research citations and Twitter-mediated research mentions. As a result, China and the USA exchanged most international students. The network structures of student mobility and online scholarly communication followed the ideas of World System Theory that describes core, periphery, and semi-periphery areas. The network analyses showed that the USA hosted the largest number of overseas students and was positioned at the center of student mobility and scholarly communication on Mendeley. The UK was in the central position on Twitter. Furthermore, research citations on Mendeley had a higher statistical correlation with international student mobility than research mentions on Twitter had. More importantly, a greater number of research citations on Mendeley predicted an increase in student mobility, and the Twitter network showed the highest density and shortest geodesic distance. The findings of this research may suggest that social media can be used effectively to spread academic ideas in the real and online worlds while considering the features of social media and related policies in different countries. Besides, worldwide intellectual mobility may enhance decentralization and co-development of the global academic society, which would be better assisted by proper utilization of social media.


Altmetric (2018).

Ayhan, Kadir-Jun (2020). “An exploration of Korean discourses on public diplomacy”. Journal of contemporary Eastern Asia, v. 19, n. 1, pp. 31-42.

Barnett, George A.; Lee, Moosung; Jiang, Ke; Park, Han Woo (2016). “The flow of international students from a macro perspective: a network analysis”. Compare: A journal of comparative and international education, v. 46, n. 4, pp. 533-559.

Barnett, George A.; Park, Han Woo (2014). “Examining the international internet using multiple measures: New methods for measuring the communication base of globalized cyberspace”. Quality & quantity, v. 48, n. 1, pp. 563-575.

Barnett, George A.; Park, Han Woo; Jiang, Ke; Tang, Chuan; Aguillo, Isidro F. (2014). “A multi-level network analysis of web-citations among the world’s universities”. Scientometrics, v. 99, n. 1, pp. 5-26.

Barnett, George A.; Ruiz, Jeanette B.; Park, Han Woo (2015). “Globalization or decentralization of hyperlinked content among websites: An examination of website co-citations”. 48th Hawaii International conference on system sciences, pp. 1779-1787.

Barnett, George A.; Wu, Reggie-Wu (1995). “The international student exchange network: 1970 & 1989”. Higher education, v. 30, n. 4, pp. 353-368.

Borgatti, Stephen P. (2005). “Centrality and network flow”. Social networks, v. 27, n. 1, pp. 55-71.

Borgatti, Stephen P.; Everett, Martin G.; Freeman, Linton C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

Bornmann, Lutz (2014a). “Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime”. Journal of informetrics, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 935-950.

Bornmann, Lutz (2014b). “Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics”. Journal of informetrics, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 895-903.

Chase-Dunn, Christopher (1992). “Theoretical approaches to World-Systems Analysis”. In: C. Polychroniou (ed.), Perspective and issues in international political economy (pp. 3-20). New York: Praeger. ISBN: 978 0 275940164

Chen, Tse-Mei; Barnett, George A. (2000). “Research on international student flows from a macro perspective: A network analysis of 1985, 1989 and 1995”. Higher education, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 435-453.

Cross, Rob; Borgatti, Stephen P.; Parker, Andrew (2002). “Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration”. California management review, v. 44, n. 2, pp. 25-46.

Cummings, William K. (1984). “Going overseas for higher education: The Asian Experience”. Comparative education review, v. 28, n. 2, pp. 241-257.

Danowski, James A.; Park, Han Woo (2020). “East Asian communication technology use and cultural values”. Journal of contemporary Eastern Asia, v. 19, n. 1, pp. 43-58.

Freeman, Linton C. (1978). “Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification”. Social networks, v. 1, n. 3, pp. 215-239.

Giuffre, Katherine (2013). Communities and networks. Using Social Network Analysis to rethink urban and community studies. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK. ISBN: 978 0 745654201

Green, Andy (1999). “Education and globalization in Europe and East Asia: convergent and divergent trends”. Journal of education policy, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 55-71.

Hassan, Saeed-Ul; Imran, Mubashir; Gillani, Uzair; Aljohani, Naif-Radi; Bowman, Timothy D.; Didegah, Fereshteh (2017). “Measuring social media activity of scientific literature: an exhaustive comparison of scopus and novel altmetrics big data”. Scientometrics, v. 113, n. 2, pp. 1037-1057.

Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent; Thelwall, Mike; Amyot, Didier; Peters, Isabella (2014). “Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?”. IT - Information technology, v. 56, n. 5, pp. 207-215.

Holmberg, Kim; Park, Han Woo (2018). “An altmetric investigation of the online visibility of South Korea-based scientific journals”. Scientometrics, v. 117, pp. 603-613.

Holmberg, Kim; Thelwall, Mike (2014). “Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication”. Scientometrics, v. 101, pp. 1027-1042.

Holmberg, Kim; Vainio, Julia (2018). “Why do some research articles receive more online attention and higher altmetrics? Reasons for online success according to the authors”. Scientometrics, v. 116, n. 1, pp. 435-447.

Jiang, Ke (2014). “International student flows between Asia, Australia, and Russia: A network analysis”. Journal of contemporary Eastern Asia, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 83-98.

Krackhardt, David (1987). “QAP partialling as a test for spuriousness”. Social networks, v. 9, n. 2, pp. 171-186.

Lee, Jack T. (2015). “The regional dimension of education hubs: Leading and brokering geopolitics”. Higher education policy, v. 28, pp. 69-89.

Maggio, Lauren A.; Meyer, Holly S.; Artino, Anthony R. (2017). “Beyond citation rates: A real-time impact analysis of health professions education research using altmetrics”. Academic Medicine, v. 92, n. 10, pp. 1449-1455.

McMahon, Mary E. (1992). “Higher education in a world market: An historical look at the global context of international study”. Higher education, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 465-482.

Meier, Harald (2016). “Global civil society from hyperlink perspective: Exploring the website networks of international NGOs”. Journal of contemporary Eastern Asia, v. 15, n. 1, pp. 64-77.

Park, Han-Woo (2020). “A new era of quality & quantity: International journal of methodology-collaborate or fall behind”. Quality & quantity, v. 54, n. 1, pp. 1-2.

Park, Hyejin; Park, Han Woo (2018). “Research evaluation of Asian countries using altmetrics: comparing South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, and China”. Scientometrics, v. 117, pp. 771-788.

Park, Hyo-Chan; Youn, Jonghee-M.; Park, Han Woo (2018). “Global mapping of scientific information exchange using altmetric data”. Quality & quantity, v. 53, pp. 935-955.

Publons (2018). 2018 global state of peer review.

Robinson-García, Nicolás; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo (2014). “New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of”. El profesional de la información, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 359-366.

Population Reference Bureau (2015). 2015 world population sheet.

Seok, Hwayoon; Barnett, George A.; Nam, Yoonjae (2020). “A social network analysis of international tourism flow”. Quality & quantity, online first.

Shannon, Thomas R. (1989). An introduction to the world system perspective. San Francisco: Westview Press. ISBN: 978 0 429494154

Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (2015). “Attention is not impact” and other challenges for altmetrics.

Thananusak, Trin; Ansari, Shahzad (2019). “Knowledge production and consumption in the digital era: The emergence of altmetrics and open access publication in management studies”. In: Z. Tammer, A. John; M. Johanna (eds.), The production of managerial knowledge and organizational theory: New approaches to writing, producing and consuming theory (pp. 77-102). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Thelwall, Mike (2008). “Bibliometrics to webometrics”. Journal of information science, v. 34, n. 4, pp. 605-621.

Thelwall, Mike (2018). Using Altmetrics to support research evaluation. In: E. Mojisola, R. Aravind, R. Edie; T. Yin-Leng (eds.). Altmetrics for research outputs measurement and scholarly information management (pp. 11-28). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

UIS Statistics (2018). Unesco Institute for Statistics.

Wallerstein, Immanuel-Maurice (1974). The modern world system. New York: Academic Press. ISBN: 978 0 520267572

Wassink, Alicia (2018). UCINet quick guide.

Web Index (2020). Webindex.

Wilford, Greg (2017). China launches internet crackdown to make it harder for people to avoid its ‘Great Firewall.’ Independent.

Cómo citar
Park, H., & Park, H. W. (2021). Global-level relationships of international student mobility and research mentions on social media. Profesional De La Información, 30(2).
Artículos de investigación / Research articles


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.