How are encyclopedias cited in academic research? Wikipedia, Britannica, Baidu Baike, and Scholarpedia



Palabras clave:

Wikipedia, Britannica, Baidu Baike, Scholarpedia, Encyclopedias, Scopus, Citation Analysis, Open access, Scholarly communication, Multidisciplinary, Countries


Encyclopedias are sometimes cited by scholarly publications, despite concerns about their credibility as sources for academic information. This study investigates trends from 2002 to 2020 in citing two crowdsourced and two expert-based encyclopedias to investigate whether they fit differently into the research landscape: Wikipedia, Britannica, Baidu Baike, and Scholarpedia. This is the first systematic comparison of the uptake of four major encyclopedias within academic research. Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four encyclopedias in each year. Wikipedia was by far the most cited encyclopedia, with up to 1% of Scopus documents citing it in Computer Science. Citations to Wikipedia increased exponentially until 2010, then slowed down and started to decrease. Both the Britannica and Scholarpedia citation rates were increasing in 2020, however. Disciplinary and national differences include Britannica being popular in Arts and Humanities, Scholarpedia in Neuroscience, and Baidu Baike in Chinese-speaking countries/territories. The results confirm that encyclopedias have minor value for academic research, often for background and definitions, with the most suitable one varying between fields and countries, and with the first evidence that the popularity of crowdsourced encyclopedias may be waning.


Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Herrera-Viedma, Enrique; Romero-Frías, Esteban (2020). “Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks”. PloS one, v. 15, n. 2, e0228713.

Baker, Daniel J. (2011). “A Jester’s promenade: Citations to Wikipedia in law reviews, 2002-2008”. Journal of law and policy for the information society, v. 7, n. 2, pp. 361-404.

Bould, M. Dylan; Hladkowicz, Emily S.; Pigford, Ashlee-Ann E.; Ufholz, Lee-Anne; Postonogova, Tatyana; Shin, Eunkyung; Boet, Sylvain (2014). “References that anyone can edit: Review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature”. BMJ, v. 348, g1585.

Brazzeal, Bradley (2011). “Citations to Wikipedia in chemistry journals: A preliminary study”. Issues in science and technology librarianship, v. Fall.

Chesney, Thomas (2006). “An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility”. First Monday, v. 11, n. 11.

Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (2015). Wikipedia.

CNKI (2019). Wikipedia.

Colavizza, Giovanni (2020). “Covid-19 research in Wikipedia”. Quantitative science studies, v. 1, n. 4, pp. 1349-1380.

Ding, Yudong; Zhang, Chunfeng; Liu, Ying (2013). “Statistics and analysis of wiki-based Chinese online-encyclopedia cited by journal papers”. Journal of intelligence, v. 32, n. 3.

Encyclopædia Britannica (2019). Wikipedia.

Fallis, Don (2008). “Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 59, n. 10, pp. 1662-1674.

Giles, Jim (2005). “Internet encyclopaedias go head to head”. Nature, v. 438, pp. 900-901.

Holman-Rector, Lucy (2008). “Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles”. Reference services review, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 7-22.

Huggett, Sarah (2012). “The influence of free encyclopedias on science”. Research trends, n. 27.

Izhikevich, Eugene (2006). “Scholarpedia”. Scholarpedia, v. 1, n. 2, pp. 1.

Jemielniak, Dariusz; Masukume, Gwinyai; Wilamowski, Maciej (2019). “The most influential medical journals according to Wikipedia: Quantitative analysis”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 21, n. 1, e11429.

Jullien, Nicolas (2012). “What we know about Wikipedia: A review of the literature analyzing the project (s)”. SSRN, 86 pp.

Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2017). “Are Wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 3. pp. 762-779.

Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike; Abdoli, Mahshid (2012). “The role of online videos in research communication: A content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 9, pp. 1710-1727.

Li, Xuemei; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2015). “The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication”. Aslib journal of information management, v. 67, n. 6, pp. 614-635.

Lih, Andrew (2004). “Wikipedia as participatory journalism: Reliable sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource”. In: 5th International symposium on online journalism.

Lin, Jennifer; Fenner, Martin (2014). “An analysis of Wikipedia references across PLOS publications”. In: Altmetrics14: Expanding impacts and metrics an ACM web science conference 2014 workshop, pp. 23-26.

Mesgari, Mastafa; Okoli, Chitu; Mehdi, Mohamad; Nielsen, Finn-Arup; Lanamäki, Arto (2015). “’The sum of all human knowledge’: A systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 2, pp. 219-245.

Messner, Marcus; DiStaso, Marcia W. (2013). “Wikipedia versus Encyclopedia Britannica: A longitudinal analysis to identify the impact of social media on the standards of knowledge”. Mass communication and society, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 465-486.

Okoli, Chitu; Mehdi, Mohamad; Mesgari, Mastafa; Nielsen, Finn-Arup; Lanamäki, Arto (2012). “The people’s encyclopedia under the gaze of the sages: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia”. SSRN.

Okoli, Chitu; Mehdi, Mohamad; Mesgari, Mastafa; Nielsen, Finn-Arup; Lanamäki, Arto (2014). “Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 12, pp. 2381-2403.

Park, Taemin-Kim (2011). “The visibility of Wikipedia in scholarly publications”. First Monday, v. 16, n. 8.

Priem, Jason; Piwowar, Heather A.; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2012). “Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact”. ArXiv.

Samoilenko, Anna; Yasseri, Taha (2014). “The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics”. EPJ data science, v. 3, n. 1.

Scopus (2021). How do I find Open Access journals and articles in Scopus?. Scopus: Access and use Support Center.

Shoyama, Rex (2014). “Citations to Wikipedia in Canadian law journal and law review articles”. Canadian law library review, v. 39, n. 12, pp. 11-15.

Tohidinasab, Fariba; Jamali, Hamid R (2013). “Why and where Wikipedia is cited in journal articles?”. Journal of scientometric research, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 231-238.

Tomaszewski, Robert (2018). “A comparative study of citations to chemical encyclopedias in scholarly articles: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology and Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry”. Scientometrics, v. 117, n. 1, pp. 175-189.

Tomaszewski, Robert; MacDonald, Karen I. (2018). “A study of citations to Wikipedia in scholarly publications”. Science & technology libraries, n. 35, n. 3, pp. 246-261.

Wang, Zhihong (2016). “Research on characteristics of online encyclopedia cited by LIS journal articles in China”. Library and information service, v. 60, n. 19, pp. 99-107.




Cómo citar

Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Mohammadi, E. (2021). How are encyclopedias cited in academic research? Wikipedia, Britannica, Baidu Baike, and Scholarpedia. Profesional De La Información, 30(5).



Artículos de investigación / Research articles


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.