How are encyclopedias cited in academic research? Wikipedia, Britannica, Baidu Baike, and Scholarpedia

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.sep.08

Palabras clave:

Wikipedia, Britannica, Baidu Baike, Scholarpedia, Encyclopedias, Scopus, Citation Analysis, Open access, Scholarly communication, Multidisciplinary, Countries

Resumen

Encyclopedias are sometimes cited by scholarly publications, despite concerns about their credibility as sources for academic information. This study investigates trends from 2002 to 2020 in citing two crowdsourced and two expert-based encyclopedias to investigate whether they fit differently into the research landscape: Wikipedia, Britannica, Baidu Baike, and Scholarpedia. This is the first systematic comparison of the uptake of four major encyclopedias within academic research. Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four encyclopedias in each year. Wikipedia was by far the most cited encyclopedia, with up to 1% of Scopus documents citing it in Computer Science. Citations to Wikipedia increased exponentially until 2010, then slowed down and started to decrease. Both the Britannica and Scholarpedia citation rates were increasing in 2020, however. Disciplinary and national differences include Britannica being popular in Arts and Humanities, Scholarpedia in Neuroscience, and Baidu Baike in Chinese-speaking countries/territories. The results confirm that encyclopedias have minor value for academic research, often for background and definitions, with the most suitable one varying between fields and countries, and with the first evidence that the popularity of crowdsourced encyclopedias may be waning.

Citas

Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Herrera-Viedma, Enrique; Romero-Frías, Esteban (2020). “Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks”. PloS one, v. 15, n. 2, e0228713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228713

Baker, Daniel J. (2011). “A Jester’s promenade: Citations to Wikipedia in law reviews, 2002-2008”. Journal of law and policy for the information society, v. 7, n. 2, pp. 361-404. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1525619

Bould, M. Dylan; Hladkowicz, Emily S.; Pigford, Ashlee-Ann E.; Ufholz, Lee-Anne; Postonogova, Tatyana; Shin, Eunkyung; Boet, Sylvain (2014). “References that anyone can edit: Review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature”. BMJ, v. 348, g1585. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1585

Brazzeal, Bradley (2011). “Citations to Wikipedia in chemistry journals: A preliminary study”. Issues in science and technology librarianship, v. Fall. https://doi.org/10.5062/F4057CV7

Chesney, Thomas (2006). “An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility”. First Monday, v. 11, n. 11. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i11.1413

Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (2015). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_Social_Sciences_Citation_Index&oldid=682574308

CNKI (2019). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CNKI&oldid=913654910

Colavizza, Giovanni (2020). “Covid-19 research in Wikipedia”. Quantitative science studies, v. 1, n. 4, pp. 1349-1380. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00080

Ding, Yudong; Zhang, Chunfeng; Liu, Ying (2013). “Statistics and analysis of wiki-based Chinese online-encyclopedia cited by journal papers”. Journal of intelligence, v. 32, n. 3. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-QBZZ201303019.htm

Encyclopædia Britannica (2019). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica&oldid=931322238

Fallis, Don (2008). “Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 59, n. 10, pp. 1662-1674. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20870

Giles, Jim (2005). “Internet encyclopaedias go head to head”. Nature, v. 438, pp. 900-901. https://doi.org/10.1038/438900a

Holman-Rector, Lucy (2008). “Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles”. Reference services review, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320810851998

Huggett, Sarah (2012). “The influence of free encyclopedias on science”. Research trends, n. 27. https://www.researchtrends.com/issue-27-march-2012/the-influence-of-free-encyclopedias-on-science

Izhikevich, Eugene (2006). “Scholarpedia”. Scholarpedia, v. 1, n. 2, pp. 1. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.1

Jemielniak, Dariusz; Masukume, Gwinyai; Wilamowski, Maciej (2019). “The most influential medical journals according to Wikipedia: Quantitative analysis”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 21, n. 1, e11429. https://doi.org/10.2196/11429

Jullien, Nicolas (2012). “What we know about Wikipedia: A review of the literature analyzing the project (s)”. SSRN, 86 pp. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2053597

Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike (2017). “Are Wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 3. pp. 762-779. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23694

Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike; Abdoli, Mahshid (2012). “The role of online videos in research communication: A content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 9, pp. 1710-1727. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22717

Li, Xuemei; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan (2015). “The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication”. Aslib journal of information management, v. 67, n. 6, pp. 614-635. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2015-0049

Lih, Andrew (2004). “Wikipedia as participatory journalism: Reliable sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource”. In: 5th International symposium on online journalism. http://www.ufrgs.br/limc/participativo/pdf/wikipedia.pdf

Lin, Jennifer; Fenner, Martin (2014). “An analysis of Wikipedia references across PLOS publications”. In: Altmetrics14: Expanding impacts and metrics an ACM web science conference 2014 workshop, pp. 23-26. https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/An_analysis_of_Wikipedia_references_across_PLOS_publications/1048991

Mesgari, Mastafa; Okoli, Chitu; Mehdi, Mohamad; Nielsen, Finn-Arup; Lanamäki, Arto (2015). “’The sum of all human knowledge’: A systematic review of scholarly research on the content of Wikipedia”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 2, pp. 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23172

Messner, Marcus; DiStaso, Marcia W. (2013). “Wikipedia versus Encyclopedia Britannica: A longitudinal analysis to identify the impact of social media on the standards of knowledge”. Mass communication and society, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 465-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.732649

Okoli, Chitu; Mehdi, Mohamad; Mesgari, Mastafa; Nielsen, Finn-Arup; Lanamäki, Arto (2012). “The people’s encyclopedia under the gaze of the sages: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia”. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2021326

Okoli, Chitu; Mehdi, Mohamad; Mesgari, Mastafa; Nielsen, Finn-Arup; Lanamäki, Arto (2014). “Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65, n. 12, pp. 2381-2403. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23162

Park, Taemin-Kim (2011). “The visibility of Wikipedia in scholarly publications”. First Monday, v. 16, n. 8. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i8.3492

Priem, Jason; Piwowar, Heather A.; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2012). “Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact”. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745

Samoilenko, Anna; Yasseri, Taha (2014). “The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics”. EPJ data science, v. 3, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds20

Scopus (2021). How do I find Open Access journals and articles in Scopus?. Scopus: Access and use Support Center. https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/11268/supporthub/scopus/kw/open+access

Shoyama, Rex (2014). “Citations to Wikipedia in Canadian law journal and law review articles”. Canadian law library review, v. 39, n. 12, pp. 11-15. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2578678

Tohidinasab, Fariba; Jamali, Hamid R (2013). “Why and where Wikipedia is cited in journal articles?”. Journal of scientometric research, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 231-238. https://doi.org/10.4103/2320-0057.135415

Tomaszewski, Robert (2018). “A comparative study of citations to chemical encyclopedias in scholarly articles: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology and Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry”. Scientometrics, v. 117, n. 1, pp. 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2844-1

Tomaszewski, Robert; MacDonald, Karen I. (2018). “A study of citations to Wikipedia in scholarly publications”. Science & technology libraries, n. 35, n. 3, pp. 246-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2016.1206052

Wang, Zhihong (2016). “Research on characteristics of online encyclopedia cited by LIS journal articles in China”. Library and information service, v. 60, n. 19, pp. 99-107. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-TSQB201619016.htm

Descargas

Publicado

2021-09-09

Cómo citar

Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Mohammadi, E. (2021). How are encyclopedias cited in academic research? Wikipedia, Britannica, Baidu Baike, and Scholarpedia. Profesional De La Información, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.sep.08

Número

Sección

Artículos de investigación / Research articles

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.